Cargando…

Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?

BACKGROUND: Patient-centered approach contributes to overall quality of healthcare, can reduce healthcare utilization by targeted treatments, and may increase patient-provider trust. Beyond attention to patient's needs and characteristics, granting them with autonomy in the decisions-making pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Connelly, Y, Kaplan, G, ZiV, A, Karni, T, Rubin, C, Tal, O
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595692/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1383
_version_ 1785124928622690304
author Connelly, Y
Kaplan, G
ZiV, A
Karni, T
Rubin, C
Tal, O
author_facet Connelly, Y
Kaplan, G
ZiV, A
Karni, T
Rubin, C
Tal, O
author_sort Connelly, Y
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient-centered approach contributes to overall quality of healthcare, can reduce healthcare utilization by targeted treatments, and may increase patient-provider trust. Beyond attention to patient's needs and characteristics, granting them with autonomy in the decisions-making process is required. However, it is important to recognize not all patients are capable nor desire to translate autonomy into action. METHODS: A survey among a representative sample of 462 adults in Israel (50% response rate), examined the ability and willingness of individuals to be involved in decisions related to their own care. The questionnaire included items concerning trust in providers, perceived ability, and degree of desired autonomy (decisional and executive). RESULTS: While 341 (74%) estimated their abilities as medium or high, only 171 participants (37%) express they will to make the decisions (following doctor's opinion, or even against recommendations). A mediation process model demonstrated that high capabilities indirectly effects trust in providers through two mediators - decisional and executive autonomy [F(8,402) = 2.82, R2 = .06, p=.0047]. High perceived capabilities associate participants with higher desired autonomy to take the decision by themselves, and the latter associates with higher tendency to execute willingness to actions (e.g., non-adhere to treatment recommendations). Finally, higher tendency to perform executive autonomy results in lower trust in providers. The indirect effect is significant (-.006, .003, [-.0118-0010]). CONCLUSIONS: we present an innovative model correlating autonomy, trust and willing to act by patients facing health decisions. Providers should be aware that the desire to be autonomous does not always merge with the ability or willing to take actions. Personalized approach based on the autonomous profile of each patient could lead to more efficient utilization of medical resources. KEY MESSAGES: • Autonomy may not align with desires and abilities of some patients. • Autonomy preferences affect adherence, trust and potentially also healthcare utilization, emphasizing the need for personalized care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105956922023-10-25 Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden? Connelly, Y Kaplan, G ZiV, A Karni, T Rubin, C Tal, O Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Patient-centered approach contributes to overall quality of healthcare, can reduce healthcare utilization by targeted treatments, and may increase patient-provider trust. Beyond attention to patient's needs and characteristics, granting them with autonomy in the decisions-making process is required. However, it is important to recognize not all patients are capable nor desire to translate autonomy into action. METHODS: A survey among a representative sample of 462 adults in Israel (50% response rate), examined the ability and willingness of individuals to be involved in decisions related to their own care. The questionnaire included items concerning trust in providers, perceived ability, and degree of desired autonomy (decisional and executive). RESULTS: While 341 (74%) estimated their abilities as medium or high, only 171 participants (37%) express they will to make the decisions (following doctor's opinion, or even against recommendations). A mediation process model demonstrated that high capabilities indirectly effects trust in providers through two mediators - decisional and executive autonomy [F(8,402) = 2.82, R2 = .06, p=.0047]. High perceived capabilities associate participants with higher desired autonomy to take the decision by themselves, and the latter associates with higher tendency to execute willingness to actions (e.g., non-adhere to treatment recommendations). Finally, higher tendency to perform executive autonomy results in lower trust in providers. The indirect effect is significant (-.006, .003, [-.0118-0010]). CONCLUSIONS: we present an innovative model correlating autonomy, trust and willing to act by patients facing health decisions. Providers should be aware that the desire to be autonomous does not always merge with the ability or willing to take actions. Personalized approach based on the autonomous profile of each patient could lead to more efficient utilization of medical resources. KEY MESSAGES: • Autonomy may not align with desires and abilities of some patients. • Autonomy preferences affect adherence, trust and potentially also healthcare utilization, emphasizing the need for personalized care. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595692/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1383 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Connelly, Y
Kaplan, G
ZiV, A
Karni, T
Rubin, C
Tal, O
Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?
title Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?
title_full Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?
title_fullStr Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?
title_full_unstemmed Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?
title_short Patient Autonomy in Practice - A Privilege or a Burden?
title_sort patient autonomy in practice - a privilege or a burden?
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595692/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1383
work_keys_str_mv AT connellyy patientautonomyinpracticeaprivilegeoraburden
AT kaplang patientautonomyinpracticeaprivilegeoraburden
AT ziva patientautonomyinpracticeaprivilegeoraburden
AT karnit patientautonomyinpracticeaprivilegeoraburden
AT rubinc patientautonomyinpracticeaprivilegeoraburden
AT talo patientautonomyinpracticeaprivilegeoraburden