Cargando…

Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust

BACKGROUND: Routinely recorded health data are increasingly used for research purposes and indispensable to stimulating appropriate and sustainable health care. In many countries access to data has proven to be a challenge. Trust by researchers, organisations and the general public is key, and adher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verheij, R, Van Veen, E B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595981/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.457
_version_ 1785124996625989632
author Verheij, R
Van Veen, E B
author_facet Verheij, R
Van Veen, E B
author_sort Verheij, R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routinely recorded health data are increasingly used for research purposes and indispensable to stimulating appropriate and sustainable health care. In many countries access to data has proven to be a challenge. Trust by researchers, organisations and the general public is key, and adherence to the rule of law is one of the key elements determining that trust. We investigated the laws and regulations regarding the reuse of health data and how they work out practically for researchers. METHODS: Our study focuses on France, Finland, Denmark, Germany, England and The Netherlands. We investigated consent mechanisms, the possibilities of record linkage, and how the sharing of data for research purposes was organised, with a combination of desk research and interviews with researchers in these countries. RESULTS: All countries investigated except England are subject to the General Data Protection Regulation. However, explicit consent is the default in Germany and the Netherlands, while other countries maintain an opt-out system or even a system of neither consent nor opt-out. A central data access authority is in place in all countries investigated except Germany and the Netherlands. The nature and level of detail of data varies widely. CONCLUSIONS: GDPR does not dictate a specific modality for the reuse of data. In terms of the reuse of health data, Germany and the Netherlands are lagging. The Netherlands seems to be the only country with continuing discussions about consent modalities. A broader societal debate about the balance between trust and the reuse of health data is needed, also against the background of a European Health Data Space. In the Netherlands, widespread government distrust is one of the challenges. Options to counteract this distrust will be discussed. KEY MESSAGES: • European countries vary in the way routine health data are accessible for research purposes. • This will affect the feasibility of a uniform European Health Data Space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10595981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105959812023-10-25 Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust Verheij, R Van Veen, E B Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Routinely recorded health data are increasingly used for research purposes and indispensable to stimulating appropriate and sustainable health care. In many countries access to data has proven to be a challenge. Trust by researchers, organisations and the general public is key, and adherence to the rule of law is one of the key elements determining that trust. We investigated the laws and regulations regarding the reuse of health data and how they work out practically for researchers. METHODS: Our study focuses on France, Finland, Denmark, Germany, England and The Netherlands. We investigated consent mechanisms, the possibilities of record linkage, and how the sharing of data for research purposes was organised, with a combination of desk research and interviews with researchers in these countries. RESULTS: All countries investigated except England are subject to the General Data Protection Regulation. However, explicit consent is the default in Germany and the Netherlands, while other countries maintain an opt-out system or even a system of neither consent nor opt-out. A central data access authority is in place in all countries investigated except Germany and the Netherlands. The nature and level of detail of data varies widely. CONCLUSIONS: GDPR does not dictate a specific modality for the reuse of data. In terms of the reuse of health data, Germany and the Netherlands are lagging. The Netherlands seems to be the only country with continuing discussions about consent modalities. A broader societal debate about the balance between trust and the reuse of health data is needed, also against the background of a European Health Data Space. In the Netherlands, widespread government distrust is one of the challenges. Options to counteract this distrust will be discussed. KEY MESSAGES: • European countries vary in the way routine health data are accessible for research purposes. • This will affect the feasibility of a uniform European Health Data Space. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10595981/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.457 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Verheij, R
Van Veen, E B
Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
title Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
title_full Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
title_fullStr Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
title_short Enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
title_sort enhancing the reuse of health data for research purposes: laws and regulations as pillars of trust
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10595981/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.457
work_keys_str_mv AT verheijr enhancingthereuseofhealthdataforresearchpurposeslawsandregulationsaspillarsoftrust
AT vanveeneb enhancingthereuseofhealthdataforresearchpurposeslawsandregulationsaspillarsoftrust