Cargando…
A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies
BACKGROUND: Reflection on COVID-19 vaccine policies is critical to understand their effectiveness. Joint level vaccine mandates encouraged by the EU were not adopted by member states, leading to a multitude of vaccine policies that varied in their mandatory nature. We hypothesised that highly mandat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596138/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.175 |
_version_ | 1785125033266380800 |
---|---|
author | Batten, N Winter, B Grgic, G Wiley, K |
author_facet | Batten, N Winter, B Grgic, G Wiley, K |
author_sort | Batten, N |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reflection on COVID-19 vaccine policies is critical to understand their effectiveness. Joint level vaccine mandates encouraged by the EU were not adopted by member states, leading to a multitude of vaccine policies that varied in their mandatory nature. We hypothesised that highly mandatory vaccine policies would result in high vaccine uptake & low mandatory polices would result in the opposite, & that differences between countries would impact policy implementation & effectiveness. METHODS: The mandatory vaccine framework was used to evaluate the mandatory nature of case study countries’ COVID-19 vaccine policies from 2020-23. France, Italy, Sweden, Poland, & Romania were chosen to represent a cross-section of economies, health systems, political histories, & COVID-19 experiences. Data was sourced from the ECDC's COVID-19 Data Tracker, government documents, media reports, & peer reviewed studies. RESULTS: Highly mandatory vaccine policies lead to higher overall vaccine uptake, as found in France 92.3% & Italy 89.8%. However, highly mandatory policies may cause social disruption & increase mistrust in vaccinations & governments, as seen in France. Moderate to low mandatory policies had mixed results. Romania & Poland had low vaccine uptake below the EU average. Additionally, low mandatory policies risk higher death & case rates & did not increase social acceptance of vaccination or avoid vaccine related social disruption, as seen in Poland. Sweden presents contrasting findings, reporting vaccine uptake of 86.2%, 13.1% above EU average despite their low mandatory policies, contradicting the hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: The research provides insights into vaccine policy decision making under the pressure of pandemic conditions, & the potential consequences of implementing various severity & enforcement levels within vaccine policies. The study demonstrates the need to develop pandemic vaccine framework to aid policymakers during disease crises. KEY MESSAGES: • The research highlights that it is essential that policy makers adopt cultural and health system appropriate vaccination policies for the populations they are targeting to vaccinate. • The variation of vaccine uptake between member states also stresses the importance for the EU to take a more central role in health policy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10596138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105961382023-10-25 A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies Batten, N Winter, B Grgic, G Wiley, K Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Reflection on COVID-19 vaccine policies is critical to understand their effectiveness. Joint level vaccine mandates encouraged by the EU were not adopted by member states, leading to a multitude of vaccine policies that varied in their mandatory nature. We hypothesised that highly mandatory vaccine policies would result in high vaccine uptake & low mandatory polices would result in the opposite, & that differences between countries would impact policy implementation & effectiveness. METHODS: The mandatory vaccine framework was used to evaluate the mandatory nature of case study countries’ COVID-19 vaccine policies from 2020-23. France, Italy, Sweden, Poland, & Romania were chosen to represent a cross-section of economies, health systems, political histories, & COVID-19 experiences. Data was sourced from the ECDC's COVID-19 Data Tracker, government documents, media reports, & peer reviewed studies. RESULTS: Highly mandatory vaccine policies lead to higher overall vaccine uptake, as found in France 92.3% & Italy 89.8%. However, highly mandatory policies may cause social disruption & increase mistrust in vaccinations & governments, as seen in France. Moderate to low mandatory policies had mixed results. Romania & Poland had low vaccine uptake below the EU average. Additionally, low mandatory policies risk higher death & case rates & did not increase social acceptance of vaccination or avoid vaccine related social disruption, as seen in Poland. Sweden presents contrasting findings, reporting vaccine uptake of 86.2%, 13.1% above EU average despite their low mandatory policies, contradicting the hypothesis. CONCLUSIONS: The research provides insights into vaccine policy decision making under the pressure of pandemic conditions, & the potential consequences of implementing various severity & enforcement levels within vaccine policies. The study demonstrates the need to develop pandemic vaccine framework to aid policymakers during disease crises. KEY MESSAGES: • The research highlights that it is essential that policy makers adopt cultural and health system appropriate vaccination policies for the populations they are targeting to vaccinate. • The variation of vaccine uptake between member states also stresses the importance for the EU to take a more central role in health policy. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10596138/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.175 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Parallel Programme Batten, N Winter, B Grgic, G Wiley, K A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies |
title | A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies |
title_full | A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies |
title_fullStr | A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies |
title_short | A comparative study on the mandatory variation of COVID-19 vaccination policies |
title_sort | comparative study on the mandatory variation of covid-19 vaccination policies |
topic | Parallel Programme |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596138/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.175 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT battenn acomparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT winterb acomparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT grgicg acomparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT wileyk acomparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT battenn comparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT winterb comparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT grgicg comparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies AT wileyk comparativestudyonthemandatoryvariationofcovid19vaccinationpolicies |