Cargando…

Criteria for best practice in health promotion

There are many interventions that take a health-promoting approach. But are they really good and do their implementation lead to results that are also a sustainable improvement for the target group in a setting? Can this improvement be scientifically evaluated and even measured or is it based on a w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Shajanian Zarneh, Y
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596145/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.467
_version_ 1785125034930470912
author Shajanian Zarneh, Y
author_facet Shajanian Zarneh, Y
author_sort Shajanian Zarneh, Y
collection PubMed
description There are many interventions that take a health-promoting approach. But are they really good and do their implementation lead to results that are also a sustainable improvement for the target group in a setting? Can this improvement be scientifically evaluated and even measured or is it based on a well-intentioned perception only? The criteria for good practice from Germany, which were developed in 2003 by the Advisory Working Group of the nationwide Collaborative Network for Equity in Health of BZgA, aim in particular for professionals in community health promotion to reflect on their work and to support them in further developing and strengthening the quality of their health promotion services. The (twelve) good practice criteria, in practical language and in the form of twelve fact sheets, each contain a definition, implementation stages of the criterion, their explanation (illustrated with examples from practice) as well as further literature. The good practice criteria include conception and target group reference and take into account participation and empowerment, but also sustainability and cost-effectiveness. These criteria also serve as selection criteria for interventions to be included in the German Good Practice Portal which has a particular focus on tackling health inequalities. In a brief presentation these criteria will be presented to the participants of the workshop in order to subsequently discuss and exchange approaches from other countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10596145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105961452023-10-25 Criteria for best practice in health promotion Shajanian Zarneh, Y Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme There are many interventions that take a health-promoting approach. But are they really good and do their implementation lead to results that are also a sustainable improvement for the target group in a setting? Can this improvement be scientifically evaluated and even measured or is it based on a well-intentioned perception only? The criteria for good practice from Germany, which were developed in 2003 by the Advisory Working Group of the nationwide Collaborative Network for Equity in Health of BZgA, aim in particular for professionals in community health promotion to reflect on their work and to support them in further developing and strengthening the quality of their health promotion services. The (twelve) good practice criteria, in practical language and in the form of twelve fact sheets, each contain a definition, implementation stages of the criterion, their explanation (illustrated with examples from practice) as well as further literature. The good practice criteria include conception and target group reference and take into account participation and empowerment, but also sustainability and cost-effectiveness. These criteria also serve as selection criteria for interventions to be included in the German Good Practice Portal which has a particular focus on tackling health inequalities. In a brief presentation these criteria will be presented to the participants of the workshop in order to subsequently discuss and exchange approaches from other countries. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10596145/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.467 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Shajanian Zarneh, Y
Criteria for best practice in health promotion
title Criteria for best practice in health promotion
title_full Criteria for best practice in health promotion
title_fullStr Criteria for best practice in health promotion
title_full_unstemmed Criteria for best practice in health promotion
title_short Criteria for best practice in health promotion
title_sort criteria for best practice in health promotion
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596145/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.467
work_keys_str_mv AT shajanianzarnehy criteriaforbestpracticeinhealthpromotion