Cargando…

Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators

BACKGROUND: Within the EASY-NET research program (NET-2016-02364191), we developed and calculated a set of KPIs on time dependent conditions (trauma, acute myocardial infarction, stroke) to analyse the Emergency Medical System (EMS) of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (FVG, 1.2M inhabitants), Italy....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Licata, S, Valent, F, Deroma, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596398/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.952
_version_ 1785125095118733312
author Licata, S
Valent, F
Deroma, L
author_facet Licata, S
Valent, F
Deroma, L
author_sort Licata, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the EASY-NET research program (NET-2016-02364191), we developed and calculated a set of KPIs on time dependent conditions (trauma, acute myocardial infarction, stroke) to analyse the Emergency Medical System (EMS) of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (FVG, 1.2M inhabitants), Italy. The results were returned to health professionals by three annual written reports, a webinar, and a workshop (2019-2023). We aim to describe the major barriers and facilitators to the implementation, use and acceptance of those KPIs in FVG. METHODS: Barriers and facilitators were investigated in 2020 through an online survey (5 questions on the report's clarity, quality, and relevance) e-mailed to doctors and ward managers (Cardiology, Neurology, Intensive Care, Emergency Department) and in 2023 through a debriefing within the research team. RESULTS: The geographical reorganisation of the regional health service and the succession of different political and professional representatives were important barriers, which also made it difficult to have access to raw data. Moreover, metadata were rarely available and several changes in variable coding occurred. In addition, the KPI results were difficult to convey to professionals, especially with a text-only feedback (457 e-mails sent, 71 surveys completed; 21/71 knew the report, 4 had read it). On the other hand, since these were the first KPIs to be calculated on the EMS, professionals collaborated enthusiastically and found them useful (60/71 of the survey responders), the multimodal presentation being the most effective feedback (40 webinar users, 100 workshop participants, despite the pandemic). Last but not least, dealing with data was easier thanks to the unofficial help of former colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation, use and acceptance of the KPIs are driven by close collaborations, but may be hindered by organisational rearrangements and a difficult access to raw data, especially when metadata are lacking. KEY MESSAGES: • KPIs are well accepted by the EMS professionals, although they are difficult to implement and introduce when political and organisational rearrangements take place. • A difficult access to raw data and the lack of metadata hinder the KPIs’ calculation but close collaborations among data professionals are precious to overcome the problem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10596398
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105963982023-10-25 Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators Licata, S Valent, F Deroma, L Eur J Public Health Poster Walks BACKGROUND: Within the EASY-NET research program (NET-2016-02364191), we developed and calculated a set of KPIs on time dependent conditions (trauma, acute myocardial infarction, stroke) to analyse the Emergency Medical System (EMS) of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (FVG, 1.2M inhabitants), Italy. The results were returned to health professionals by three annual written reports, a webinar, and a workshop (2019-2023). We aim to describe the major barriers and facilitators to the implementation, use and acceptance of those KPIs in FVG. METHODS: Barriers and facilitators were investigated in 2020 through an online survey (5 questions on the report's clarity, quality, and relevance) e-mailed to doctors and ward managers (Cardiology, Neurology, Intensive Care, Emergency Department) and in 2023 through a debriefing within the research team. RESULTS: The geographical reorganisation of the regional health service and the succession of different political and professional representatives were important barriers, which also made it difficult to have access to raw data. Moreover, metadata were rarely available and several changes in variable coding occurred. In addition, the KPI results were difficult to convey to professionals, especially with a text-only feedback (457 e-mails sent, 71 surveys completed; 21/71 knew the report, 4 had read it). On the other hand, since these were the first KPIs to be calculated on the EMS, professionals collaborated enthusiastically and found them useful (60/71 of the survey responders), the multimodal presentation being the most effective feedback (40 webinar users, 100 workshop participants, despite the pandemic). Last but not least, dealing with data was easier thanks to the unofficial help of former colleagues. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation, use and acceptance of the KPIs are driven by close collaborations, but may be hindered by organisational rearrangements and a difficult access to raw data, especially when metadata are lacking. KEY MESSAGES: • KPIs are well accepted by the EMS professionals, although they are difficult to implement and introduce when political and organisational rearrangements take place. • A difficult access to raw data and the lack of metadata hinder the KPIs’ calculation but close collaborations among data professionals are precious to overcome the problem. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10596398/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.952 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Walks
Licata, S
Valent, F
Deroma, L
Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators
title Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators
title_full Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators
title_fullStr Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators
title_full_unstemmed Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators
title_short Key Performance Indicators in the Emergency Medical System: barriers and facilitators
title_sort key performance indicators in the emergency medical system: barriers and facilitators
topic Poster Walks
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596398/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.952
work_keys_str_mv AT licatas keyperformanceindicatorsintheemergencymedicalsystembarriersandfacilitators
AT valentf keyperformanceindicatorsintheemergencymedicalsystembarriersandfacilitators
AT deromal keyperformanceindicatorsintheemergencymedicalsystembarriersandfacilitators