Cargando…
The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients
INTRODUCTION: The social defeat hypothesis (SDH) suggests that a chronic experience of social defeat increases the likelihood of the development of psychosis. The SDH indicates that a negative experience of exclusion leads to an increase in the baseline activity of the mesolimbic dopamine system (MD...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596480/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.440 |
_version_ | 1785125114447134720 |
---|---|
author | Malaviya, A. Lalousis, P. A. Wood, S. J. Bertolino, A. Borgwardt, S. B. Brambilla, P. Kambeitz, J. Lencer, R. Pantelis, C. Ruhrmann, S. Salokangas, R. K. Schultze-Lutter, F. Meisenzahl, E. Koutsouleris, N. Upthegrove, R. |
author_facet | Malaviya, A. Lalousis, P. A. Wood, S. J. Bertolino, A. Borgwardt, S. B. Brambilla, P. Kambeitz, J. Lencer, R. Pantelis, C. Ruhrmann, S. Salokangas, R. K. Schultze-Lutter, F. Meisenzahl, E. Koutsouleris, N. Upthegrove, R. |
author_sort | Malaviya, A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The social defeat hypothesis (SDH) suggests that a chronic experience of social defeat increases the likelihood of the development of psychosis. The SDH indicates that a negative experience of exclusion leads to an increase in the baseline activity of the mesolimbic dopamine system (MDS), which in turn leads to the onset of psychosis. Social defeat models have previously been produced using animal models and preclinical literature; however, these theories have not fully been tested in human clinical samples. There have been studies implying changes in brain structure due to social defeat interactions; however, research evidence is varied. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to uncover whether exposure to SoDe has an impact on brain structure. Furthermore, we hope to understand if these changes are relevant to other mental health disorders. METHODS: 698 (506 no SoDe, 191 SoDe) participants between the ages of 15-41 were recruited from the PRONIA-FP7 study. SoDe was measured from the self-reported questionnaires’ Bullying Scale’ and ‘The Everyday Discrimination Scale’. T1-weighted structural MRI data were processed; five 2 sample t-test analyses were carried out to compare the GMV differences in the entire sample and between the four groups. RESULTS: The VBM analysis showed significant group interactions in the right thalamus proper when comparing participants who had experience SoDe to participants who had not experienced SoDe including all 4 groups along with left cerebral white matter differences. In the ROP subgroup, significant group interactions in the left cerebellum white matter were found along with right cerebral white matter, left cerebral white matter and right Thalamus proper. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there are significant group interactions in thalamus and cerebral white matter. This is in keeping with some previous research suggesting volumetric changes in the thalamus due to stress and psychosis. Similarly for white matter there is some evidence suggesting differences due to SoDe and psychosis. However, there is a scarcity of research in this area with different research suggesting distinctive findings and therefore the evidence is inconclusive. In the ROP group analysis significant group interactions were present in the cerebellum due to SoDe experience. There is research suggesting the cerebellum’s role in multiple different aspects like social interaction, higher-order cognition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and psychotic symptoms, with every research suggesting multiple different things the role of the cerebellum in SoDe in the ROP population is in question. Nonetheless this large-scale research presents some interesting novel finding and leads the way to a new area of research. Further analysis will explore the relationship between groups on markers of stress (CRP) and neuroinflammation as potential mediation of the environmental effects of SoDe. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10596480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105964802023-10-25 The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients Malaviya, A. Lalousis, P. A. Wood, S. J. Bertolino, A. Borgwardt, S. B. Brambilla, P. Kambeitz, J. Lencer, R. Pantelis, C. Ruhrmann, S. Salokangas, R. K. Schultze-Lutter, F. Meisenzahl, E. Koutsouleris, N. Upthegrove, R. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: The social defeat hypothesis (SDH) suggests that a chronic experience of social defeat increases the likelihood of the development of psychosis. The SDH indicates that a negative experience of exclusion leads to an increase in the baseline activity of the mesolimbic dopamine system (MDS), which in turn leads to the onset of psychosis. Social defeat models have previously been produced using animal models and preclinical literature; however, these theories have not fully been tested in human clinical samples. There have been studies implying changes in brain structure due to social defeat interactions; however, research evidence is varied. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to uncover whether exposure to SoDe has an impact on brain structure. Furthermore, we hope to understand if these changes are relevant to other mental health disorders. METHODS: 698 (506 no SoDe, 191 SoDe) participants between the ages of 15-41 were recruited from the PRONIA-FP7 study. SoDe was measured from the self-reported questionnaires’ Bullying Scale’ and ‘The Everyday Discrimination Scale’. T1-weighted structural MRI data were processed; five 2 sample t-test analyses were carried out to compare the GMV differences in the entire sample and between the four groups. RESULTS: The VBM analysis showed significant group interactions in the right thalamus proper when comparing participants who had experience SoDe to participants who had not experienced SoDe including all 4 groups along with left cerebral white matter differences. In the ROP subgroup, significant group interactions in the left cerebellum white matter were found along with right cerebral white matter, left cerebral white matter and right Thalamus proper. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there are significant group interactions in thalamus and cerebral white matter. This is in keeping with some previous research suggesting volumetric changes in the thalamus due to stress and psychosis. Similarly for white matter there is some evidence suggesting differences due to SoDe and psychosis. However, there is a scarcity of research in this area with different research suggesting distinctive findings and therefore the evidence is inconclusive. In the ROP group analysis significant group interactions were present in the cerebellum due to SoDe experience. There is research suggesting the cerebellum’s role in multiple different aspects like social interaction, higher-order cognition, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and psychotic symptoms, with every research suggesting multiple different things the role of the cerebellum in SoDe in the ROP population is in question. Nonetheless this large-scale research presents some interesting novel finding and leads the way to a new area of research. Further analysis will explore the relationship between groups on markers of stress (CRP) and neuroinflammation as potential mediation of the environmental effects of SoDe. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared Cambridge University Press 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10596480/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.440 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Malaviya, A. Lalousis, P. A. Wood, S. J. Bertolino, A. Borgwardt, S. B. Brambilla, P. Kambeitz, J. Lencer, R. Pantelis, C. Ruhrmann, S. Salokangas, R. K. Schultze-Lutter, F. Meisenzahl, E. Koutsouleris, N. Upthegrove, R. The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients |
title | The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients |
title_full | The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients |
title_fullStr | The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients |
title_short | The Role of Social Defeat in Neurological differences in Psychotic Patients |
title_sort | role of social defeat in neurological differences in psychotic patients |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596480/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malaviyaa theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT lalousispa theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT woodsj theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT bertolinoa theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT borgwardtsb theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT brambillap theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT kambeitzj theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT lencerr theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT pantelisc theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT ruhrmanns theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT salokangasrk theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT schultzelutterf theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT meisenzahle theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT koutsoulerisn theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT upthegrover theroleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT malaviyaa roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT lalousispa roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT woodsj roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT bertolinoa roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT borgwardtsb roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT brambillap roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT kambeitzj roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT lencerr roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT pantelisc roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT ruhrmanns roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT salokangasrk roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT schultzelutterf roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT meisenzahle roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT koutsoulerisn roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients AT upthegrover roleofsocialdefeatinneurologicaldifferencesinpsychoticpatients |