Cargando…

The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation

BACKGROUND: In the context of scarce health care resources, national policies and legislation increasingly advocate patients’ personal responsibility for their ill health. This report aims at studying the concept of personal responsibility as a basis for resources prioritisation in Bulgarian health...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Yankulovska, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596677/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.663
_version_ 1785125161269198848
author Yankulovska, S
author_facet Yankulovska, S
author_sort Yankulovska, S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the context of scarce health care resources, national policies and legislation increasingly advocate patients’ personal responsibility for their ill health. This report aims at studying the concept of personal responsibility as a basis for resources prioritisation in Bulgarian health and social legislation. METHODS: Official normative documents were subjected to content and comparative analysis. RESULTS: Indirect personal responsibility can be found in the Bulgarian Health Act, Art.94 stating the duty of the patient to take care of his own health. Further, in the liver transplant algorithm of the Recipient Selection Ordinance, it is possible to distinguish a hidden criterion of patient's responsibility. One possible interpretation of Article 12 of the Code of Professional Ethics of Physicians in Bulgaria is the right of a physician to refuse medical care on the grounds of lack of trust due to patient's non-compliance with prescriptions. The latter correlates with the idea of prospective responsibility. Direct personal retrospective responsibility is imputed in the Health Insurance Act, Art. 111, where persons who themselves have damaged their health or in a state of alcoholic intoxication or drug abuse have damaged the health of others, must reimburse the costs of the NHIF. We also find clearly defined personal responsibility in the Social Security Code, Art. 46, according to which monetary compensation for temporary incapacity is not paid to insured persons who intentionally damage their health. There is no official data on the applicability of these legal norms. CONCLUSIONS: Although in a less categorical form and not in relation to access to specific planned treatments, the idea of the personal responsibility is embodied in the Bulgarian legislation. It is necessary to accumulate further data on the applicability of these norms, as well as to study the views of patients, users of social services, professionals and general public. KEY MESSAGES: • Personal responsibility is gradually entering Bulgarian legislation as an official criterion for the allocation of social and health resources. • It is necessary to accumulate further data on the applicability of the prescribed legal norms, as well as to study the views of patients, users of social services, professionals and general public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10596677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105966772023-10-25 The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation Yankulovska, S Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: In the context of scarce health care resources, national policies and legislation increasingly advocate patients’ personal responsibility for their ill health. This report aims at studying the concept of personal responsibility as a basis for resources prioritisation in Bulgarian health and social legislation. METHODS: Official normative documents were subjected to content and comparative analysis. RESULTS: Indirect personal responsibility can be found in the Bulgarian Health Act, Art.94 stating the duty of the patient to take care of his own health. Further, in the liver transplant algorithm of the Recipient Selection Ordinance, it is possible to distinguish a hidden criterion of patient's responsibility. One possible interpretation of Article 12 of the Code of Professional Ethics of Physicians in Bulgaria is the right of a physician to refuse medical care on the grounds of lack of trust due to patient's non-compliance with prescriptions. The latter correlates with the idea of prospective responsibility. Direct personal retrospective responsibility is imputed in the Health Insurance Act, Art. 111, where persons who themselves have damaged their health or in a state of alcoholic intoxication or drug abuse have damaged the health of others, must reimburse the costs of the NHIF. We also find clearly defined personal responsibility in the Social Security Code, Art. 46, according to which monetary compensation for temporary incapacity is not paid to insured persons who intentionally damage their health. There is no official data on the applicability of these legal norms. CONCLUSIONS: Although in a less categorical form and not in relation to access to specific planned treatments, the idea of the personal responsibility is embodied in the Bulgarian legislation. It is necessary to accumulate further data on the applicability of these norms, as well as to study the views of patients, users of social services, professionals and general public. KEY MESSAGES: • Personal responsibility is gradually entering Bulgarian legislation as an official criterion for the allocation of social and health resources. • It is necessary to accumulate further data on the applicability of the prescribed legal norms, as well as to study the views of patients, users of social services, professionals and general public. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10596677/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.663 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Yankulovska, S
The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation
title The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation
title_full The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation
title_fullStr The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation
title_full_unstemmed The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation
title_short The concept of personal responsibility in Bulgarian health and social legislation
title_sort concept of personal responsibility in bulgarian health and social legislation
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596677/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.663
work_keys_str_mv AT yankulovskas theconceptofpersonalresponsibilityinbulgarianhealthandsociallegislation
AT yankulovskas conceptofpersonalresponsibilityinbulgarianhealthandsociallegislation