Cargando…

Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria

BACKGROUND: Starting from 2018, the University of Krems and ‘Tut gut!’ Gesundheitsvorsorge GmbH have jointly implemented the two-year academic program ‘Regional Health Coordination’, which trains students to become a Regional Health Coordinator (RHC). It is funded by the Lower Austrian Health and So...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griebler, U, Klingenstein, P, Grillich, L, Moick, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596824/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.535
_version_ 1785125195812438016
author Griebler, U
Klingenstein, P
Grillich, L
Moick, S
author_facet Griebler, U
Klingenstein, P
Grillich, L
Moick, S
author_sort Griebler, U
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Starting from 2018, the University of Krems and ‘Tut gut!’ Gesundheitsvorsorge GmbH have jointly implemented the two-year academic program ‘Regional Health Coordination’, which trains students to become a Regional Health Coordinator (RHC). It is funded by the Lower Austrian Health and Social Fund. We evaluated the pilot-program and the work of the RHC in the first two years after graduation. The objectives of the evaluation were to provide 1) a basis for further development of the academic program and 2) an assessment of the achievement of the program objectives. METHODS: The evaluation ran from 2018 to 2022 and followed a mixed-methods approach. Qualitative interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, document analyses of annual RHC activity reports and repeated written community surveys in 13 municipalities were conducted. RESULTS: The evaluation showed that RHCs already bundled health promotion (HP) activities and worked on their HP network within the municipalities during the practical training period. HP was given a higher priority in some municipal administrations. The pilot program was consistently rated positively, and the curriculum was optimized. In the first two years after graduation, the RHCs developed and implemented HP measures and endeavoured to engage citizens. However, genuine involvement was rare. The results showed that future HP interventions should especially target older people, less educated and male citizens. RHCs were seldomly involved in health policy decisions, although they often worked with mayors. Personal characteristics, an existing network in the community and support from the local government were success factors for the work of the RHCs. CONCLUSIONS: RHCs play an important role in the coordination of community HP but should be stronger included in local policy decision-making. Citizens should be more involved in planning and implementing HP measures. KEY MESSAGES: • An academic training program for regional health coordination helped to improve community health promotion. • An existing network and the involvement in the local government facilitated the work of graduated regional health coordinators.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10596824
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105968242023-10-25 Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria Griebler, U Klingenstein, P Grillich, L Moick, S Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme BACKGROUND: Starting from 2018, the University of Krems and ‘Tut gut!’ Gesundheitsvorsorge GmbH have jointly implemented the two-year academic program ‘Regional Health Coordination’, which trains students to become a Regional Health Coordinator (RHC). It is funded by the Lower Austrian Health and Social Fund. We evaluated the pilot-program and the work of the RHC in the first two years after graduation. The objectives of the evaluation were to provide 1) a basis for further development of the academic program and 2) an assessment of the achievement of the program objectives. METHODS: The evaluation ran from 2018 to 2022 and followed a mixed-methods approach. Qualitative interviews and focus groups with stakeholders, document analyses of annual RHC activity reports and repeated written community surveys in 13 municipalities were conducted. RESULTS: The evaluation showed that RHCs already bundled health promotion (HP) activities and worked on their HP network within the municipalities during the practical training period. HP was given a higher priority in some municipal administrations. The pilot program was consistently rated positively, and the curriculum was optimized. In the first two years after graduation, the RHCs developed and implemented HP measures and endeavoured to engage citizens. However, genuine involvement was rare. The results showed that future HP interventions should especially target older people, less educated and male citizens. RHCs were seldomly involved in health policy decisions, although they often worked with mayors. Personal characteristics, an existing network in the community and support from the local government were success factors for the work of the RHCs. CONCLUSIONS: RHCs play an important role in the coordination of community HP but should be stronger included in local policy decision-making. Citizens should be more involved in planning and implementing HP measures. KEY MESSAGES: • An academic training program for regional health coordination helped to improve community health promotion. • An existing network and the involvement in the local government facilitated the work of graduated regional health coordinators. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10596824/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.535 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Griebler, U
Klingenstein, P
Grillich, L
Moick, S
Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria
title Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria
title_full Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria
title_fullStr Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria
title_full_unstemmed Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria
title_short Regional Health Coordination: An evaluation of the first pilot training program in Lower Austria
title_sort regional health coordination: an evaluation of the first pilot training program in lower austria
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596824/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.535
work_keys_str_mv AT griebleru regionalhealthcoordinationanevaluationofthefirstpilottrainingprograminloweraustria
AT klingensteinp regionalhealthcoordinationanevaluationofthefirstpilottrainingprograminloweraustria
AT grillichl regionalhealthcoordinationanevaluationofthefirstpilottrainingprograminloweraustria
AT moicks regionalhealthcoordinationanevaluationofthefirstpilottrainingprograminloweraustria