Cargando…

Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?

BACKGROUND: Breastmilk is the ideal nutrition for infants, and breastfeeding is an important health promoting behaviour. In Denmark, most mothers initiate breastfeeding but many cease within the first months resulting in just 14% reaching the World Health Organization recommendation of six months ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rossau, H K, Gadeberg, A K, Strandberg-Larsen, K, Nilsson, IMS, Villadsen, S F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596963/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1560
_version_ 1785125229385744384
author Rossau, H K
Gadeberg, A K
Strandberg-Larsen, K
Nilsson, IMS
Villadsen, S F
author_facet Rossau, H K
Gadeberg, A K
Strandberg-Larsen, K
Nilsson, IMS
Villadsen, S F
author_sort Rossau, H K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breastmilk is the ideal nutrition for infants, and breastfeeding is an important health promoting behaviour. In Denmark, most mothers initiate breastfeeding but many cease within the first months resulting in just 14% reaching the World Health Organization recommendation of six months exclusive breastfeeding. A large-scaled, cluster-randomized intervention study implemented in the Danish health visiting programme aimed to extent the duration of breastfeeding and reduce social inequality. To elucidate how the intervention was implemented, a process evaluation of the intervention was conducted. METHODS: Following the MRC guidelines for process evaluation, we used a mixed methods approach to assess the delivery of the intervention, and facilitators and barriers in the context that affected the implementation. Data from questionnaires distributed to the health visiting managers of 21 Danish municipalities and 242 health visitors employed there, and data from three focus groups with health visitors and eight individual interviews with mothers in the intervention informed the process evaluation. RESULTS: Preliminary findings from questionnaires imply that the training program slightly enhanced health visitors’ breastfeeding support competencies. However, health visitors explained in the focus groups that they provided support as usual. A contextual factor hindering the implementation was change of personnel. Having had favourable experiences with the intervention acted as facilitator. Findings from interviews with mothers indicated a high fidelity in the distribution of intervention materials and partner involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings of this study show variability in how the intervention was implemented throughout the intervention sites. This evaluation will assist in the interpretation of the results of the effectiveness study and inform policy makers about if and how this intervention could be scaled up. KEY MESSAGES: • Health visitors in intervention clusters seemed to have gained competencies in breastfeeding support; however, expressed that they provided support ‘as usual’. • Change of personnel acted as a barrier, while having had positive experiences with the intervention acted as a facilitator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10596963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105969632023-10-25 Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery? Rossau, H K Gadeberg, A K Strandberg-Larsen, K Nilsson, IMS Villadsen, S F Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: Breastmilk is the ideal nutrition for infants, and breastfeeding is an important health promoting behaviour. In Denmark, most mothers initiate breastfeeding but many cease within the first months resulting in just 14% reaching the World Health Organization recommendation of six months exclusive breastfeeding. A large-scaled, cluster-randomized intervention study implemented in the Danish health visiting programme aimed to extent the duration of breastfeeding and reduce social inequality. To elucidate how the intervention was implemented, a process evaluation of the intervention was conducted. METHODS: Following the MRC guidelines for process evaluation, we used a mixed methods approach to assess the delivery of the intervention, and facilitators and barriers in the context that affected the implementation. Data from questionnaires distributed to the health visiting managers of 21 Danish municipalities and 242 health visitors employed there, and data from three focus groups with health visitors and eight individual interviews with mothers in the intervention informed the process evaluation. RESULTS: Preliminary findings from questionnaires imply that the training program slightly enhanced health visitors’ breastfeeding support competencies. However, health visitors explained in the focus groups that they provided support as usual. A contextual factor hindering the implementation was change of personnel. Having had favourable experiences with the intervention acted as facilitator. Findings from interviews with mothers indicated a high fidelity in the distribution of intervention materials and partner involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings of this study show variability in how the intervention was implemented throughout the intervention sites. This evaluation will assist in the interpretation of the results of the effectiveness study and inform policy makers about if and how this intervention could be scaled up. KEY MESSAGES: • Health visitors in intervention clusters seemed to have gained competencies in breastfeeding support; however, expressed that they provided support ‘as usual’. • Change of personnel acted as a barrier, while having had positive experiences with the intervention acted as a facilitator. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10596963/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1560 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Rossau, H K
Gadeberg, A K
Strandberg-Larsen, K
Nilsson, IMS
Villadsen, S F
Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?
title Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?
title_full Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?
title_fullStr Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?
title_short Process evaluation of The Breastfeeding Trial. What factors impact the intervention delivery?
title_sort process evaluation of the breastfeeding trial. what factors impact the intervention delivery?
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10596963/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1560
work_keys_str_mv AT rossauhk processevaluationofthebreastfeedingtrialwhatfactorsimpacttheinterventiondelivery
AT gadebergak processevaluationofthebreastfeedingtrialwhatfactorsimpacttheinterventiondelivery
AT strandberglarsenk processevaluationofthebreastfeedingtrialwhatfactorsimpacttheinterventiondelivery
AT nilssonims processevaluationofthebreastfeedingtrialwhatfactorsimpacttheinterventiondelivery
AT villadsensf processevaluationofthebreastfeedingtrialwhatfactorsimpacttheinterventiondelivery