Cargando…

Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Pregnancy loss (PL) is common (∼25% of pregnancies). PL has a negative psychological impact on women and growing evidence that partners are impacted too. Thus PL is a unique public health issue - a “couple” problem that affects both partners. With millions of pregnancies eac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, H S, Schmidt, L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597000/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1373
_version_ 1785125238593290240
author Nielsen, H S
Schmidt, L
author_facet Nielsen, H S
Schmidt, L
author_sort Nielsen, H S
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Pregnancy loss (PL) is common (∼25% of pregnancies). PL has a negative psychological impact on women and growing evidence that partners are impacted too. Thus PL is a unique public health issue - a “couple” problem that affects both partners. With millions of pregnancies each year, a significant number of pregnant women and their partners will have experienced prior PL and may be vulnerable in pregnancy given their reproductive history. But are their needs met by the standard pregnancy care? This study used dyadic, longitudinal interviews to examine: what are couples’ perceptions of the health care and support provided in a subsequent pregnancy after PL and do their needs change across a pregnancy? The combination of dyadic and longitudinal methods is rarely used in health services research, but seems especially well-placed to examine how needs for health care change across the pregnancy and the perception of both partners. METHODS: Semi-structured dyadic interviews were conducted with 15 couples over four time periods across a new pregnancy after PL (after pregnancy test and once in each trimester). Couples were recruited from a national cohort of couples with PL. Interviews were held in person or via Zoom in Denmark. Qualitative dyadic and longitudinal interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis with a focus on identification of common themes within and across couples and trimesters. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: Dyadic data showed that both partners experienced anxiety and worry about the safety of the fetus and possibility of miscarrying. Longitudinal data revealed that couples believed that standard pregnancy care in the first trimester of pregnancy was insufficient for their needs. They wished for ongoing access to regular scans and close monitoring to provide reassurance and detect problems early. They reported that their needs for care were met through antenatal care provided in the later stages of pregnancy. KEY MESSAGES: • Dyadic longitudinal interviews generate nuanced data about a shared experience of receiving health care across a pregnancy. • A better understanding of needs can inform development and provision of effective health care and support to fill identified gaps and promote overall family, maternal and infant health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597000
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105970002023-10-25 Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example Nielsen, H S Schmidt, L Eur J Public Health Poster Displays INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Pregnancy loss (PL) is common (∼25% of pregnancies). PL has a negative psychological impact on women and growing evidence that partners are impacted too. Thus PL is a unique public health issue - a “couple” problem that affects both partners. With millions of pregnancies each year, a significant number of pregnant women and their partners will have experienced prior PL and may be vulnerable in pregnancy given their reproductive history. But are their needs met by the standard pregnancy care? This study used dyadic, longitudinal interviews to examine: what are couples’ perceptions of the health care and support provided in a subsequent pregnancy after PL and do their needs change across a pregnancy? The combination of dyadic and longitudinal methods is rarely used in health services research, but seems especially well-placed to examine how needs for health care change across the pregnancy and the perception of both partners. METHODS: Semi-structured dyadic interviews were conducted with 15 couples over four time periods across a new pregnancy after PL (after pregnancy test and once in each trimester). Couples were recruited from a national cohort of couples with PL. Interviews were held in person or via Zoom in Denmark. Qualitative dyadic and longitudinal interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis with a focus on identification of common themes within and across couples and trimesters. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: Dyadic data showed that both partners experienced anxiety and worry about the safety of the fetus and possibility of miscarrying. Longitudinal data revealed that couples believed that standard pregnancy care in the first trimester of pregnancy was insufficient for their needs. They wished for ongoing access to regular scans and close monitoring to provide reassurance and detect problems early. They reported that their needs for care were met through antenatal care provided in the later stages of pregnancy. KEY MESSAGES: • Dyadic longitudinal interviews generate nuanced data about a shared experience of receiving health care across a pregnancy. • A better understanding of needs can inform development and provision of effective health care and support to fill identified gaps and promote overall family, maternal and infant health. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10597000/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1373 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Nielsen, H S
Schmidt, L
Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
title Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
title_full Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
title_fullStr Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
title_full_unstemmed Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
title_short Use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
title_sort use of dyadic longitudinal interviews in health services research: a case example
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597000/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1373
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsenhs useofdyadiclongitudinalinterviewsinhealthservicesresearchacaseexample
AT schmidtl useofdyadiclongitudinalinterviewsinhealthservicesresearchacaseexample