Cargando…

Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status

INTRODUCTION: Smoking prevalence is high in vocational education across Europe. School-based programs to reduce smoking among older adolescents and young adults are sparse. School tobacco policies are often used though the evidence for their effectiveness is inconclusive. The implementation process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jensen, M, Fredenslund Krølner, R, Thygesen, L C, Andersen, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597102/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.248
_version_ 1785125263078588416
author Jensen, M
Fredenslund Krølner, R
Thygesen, L C
Andersen, S
author_facet Jensen, M
Fredenslund Krølner, R
Thygesen, L C
Andersen, S
author_sort Jensen, M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Smoking prevalence is high in vocational education across Europe. School-based programs to reduce smoking among older adolescents and young adults are sparse. School tobacco policies are often used though the evidence for their effectiveness is inconclusive. The implementation process of far-reaching smoking prevention initiatives such as tobacco policies can be challenging due to, e.g., nicotine dependency and attitudes towards smoking. We investigated the association between implementation of a smoking prevention intervention and students’ smoking status. METHODS: The “Focus” intervention combined a comprehensive school tobacco policy with educational activities and access to smoking cessation support. It was tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 14 Danish vocational schools. Based on a conceptual model, we calculated an individual level implementation score for all students in the intervention arm, including schools’ delivery (principal and teacher surveys) and students’ receipt (student surveys) of the intervention components at 4-5 month-follow-up. We compared odds for smoking daily or weekly (regular smoking) for students with low, medium, and high implementation with students in control schools using multilevel logistic regression models (N = 1112). RESULTS: Students with high implementation had significantly lower odds for smoking compared to the control group (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.78) whereas students with medium (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.95-3.12) and low (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.68-2.34) implementation had higher odds, although insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: High implementation of the “Focus” intervention was associated with less smoking. Tendencies in the opposite direction for lower implementation may indicate a complex, non-linear relationship between implementation level and smoking behavior. This suggests that careful implementation efforts are needed to reduce smoking in older adolescent and young adult school settings. KEY MESSAGES: • Our study suggests that efforts to support implementation of smoking prevention interventions are needed to reduce smoking in vocational education and similar settings. • To capture the complexity of the implementation process, we use an individual level measure of implementation based on a conceptual model and multiple data sources.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105971022023-10-25 Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status Jensen, M Fredenslund Krølner, R Thygesen, L C Andersen, S Eur J Public Health Parallel Programme INTRODUCTION: Smoking prevalence is high in vocational education across Europe. School-based programs to reduce smoking among older adolescents and young adults are sparse. School tobacco policies are often used though the evidence for their effectiveness is inconclusive. The implementation process of far-reaching smoking prevention initiatives such as tobacco policies can be challenging due to, e.g., nicotine dependency and attitudes towards smoking. We investigated the association between implementation of a smoking prevention intervention and students’ smoking status. METHODS: The “Focus” intervention combined a comprehensive school tobacco policy with educational activities and access to smoking cessation support. It was tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial in 14 Danish vocational schools. Based on a conceptual model, we calculated an individual level implementation score for all students in the intervention arm, including schools’ delivery (principal and teacher surveys) and students’ receipt (student surveys) of the intervention components at 4-5 month-follow-up. We compared odds for smoking daily or weekly (regular smoking) for students with low, medium, and high implementation with students in control schools using multilevel logistic regression models (N = 1112). RESULTS: Students with high implementation had significantly lower odds for smoking compared to the control group (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.78) whereas students with medium (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 0.95-3.12) and low (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.68-2.34) implementation had higher odds, although insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: High implementation of the “Focus” intervention was associated with less smoking. Tendencies in the opposite direction for lower implementation may indicate a complex, non-linear relationship between implementation level and smoking behavior. This suggests that careful implementation efforts are needed to reduce smoking in older adolescent and young adult school settings. KEY MESSAGES: • Our study suggests that efforts to support implementation of smoking prevention interventions are needed to reduce smoking in vocational education and similar settings. • To capture the complexity of the implementation process, we use an individual level measure of implementation based on a conceptual model and multiple data sources. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10597102/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.248 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Parallel Programme
Jensen, M
Fredenslund Krølner, R
Thygesen, L C
Andersen, S
Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
title Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
title_full Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
title_fullStr Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
title_full_unstemmed Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
title_short Impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
title_sort impact of implementation of a smoking prevention intervention on vocational students’ smoking status
topic Parallel Programme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597102/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.248
work_keys_str_mv AT jensenm impactofimplementationofasmokingpreventioninterventiononvocationalstudentssmokingstatus
AT fredenslundkrølnerr impactofimplementationofasmokingpreventioninterventiononvocationalstudentssmokingstatus
AT thygesenlc impactofimplementationofasmokingpreventioninterventiononvocationalstudentssmokingstatus
AT andersens impactofimplementationofasmokingpreventioninterventiononvocationalstudentssmokingstatus