Cargando…

Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method

BACKGROUND: The multimodal projects: “Zero Urinary Tract Infection” (Z-UTI), “Zero Resistance” (Z-R), “Zero Pneumonia” (Z-P) and “Zero Bacteraemia” (Z-B) consist in implementing a bundle of evidence-based recommendations to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and acquisition of multidrug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Erro-Iturri, B, Loroño-Ortiz, G, Jiménez-Onsurbe, M, Carbajal-Domínguez, S, Gonzalez de Viñaspre-Remirez, I, De Luz-Sanchez, Y, Hernandez-Gonzalez, A, Barberena-Iriarte, C, Rico-Pisuerga, M A, Páramo-Andrés, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597142/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1494
_version_ 1785125273023283200
author Erro-Iturri, B
Loroño-Ortiz, G
Jiménez-Onsurbe, M
Carbajal-Domínguez, S
Gonzalez de Viñaspre-Remirez, I
De Luz-Sanchez, Y
Hernandez-Gonzalez, A
Barberena-Iriarte, C
Rico-Pisuerga, M A
Páramo-Andrés, S
author_facet Erro-Iturri, B
Loroño-Ortiz, G
Jiménez-Onsurbe, M
Carbajal-Domínguez, S
Gonzalez de Viñaspre-Remirez, I
De Luz-Sanchez, Y
Hernandez-Gonzalez, A
Barberena-Iriarte, C
Rico-Pisuerga, M A
Páramo-Andrés, S
author_sort Erro-Iturri, B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The multimodal projects: “Zero Urinary Tract Infection” (Z-UTI), “Zero Resistance” (Z-R), “Zero Pneumonia” (Z-P) and “Zero Bacteraemia” (Z-B) consist in implementing a bundle of evidence-based recommendations to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR-B) during patient's intensive care unit stay. They have been instituted in our tertiary hospital for several years and in order to assess compliance, we perform surveillance based on direct observation checklist. The aim was to examine compliance of recommendations and to evaluate direct observation as surveillance method. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of audits performed between 2020-2022. Compliance was estimated as the average of “yes”-marked percentage. Recommendations with “yes”-marked below 50% were excluded. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis of direct observation checklist was conducted. RESULTS: Regarding Z-R (n = 129 observations) compliance was 86.5%.”Giving information about isolation to family” was excluded registering 55.4% “not seen”-marked. In Z-P (n = 262 obs.) compliance was 82.3%. “Hand hygiene and sterile technique for bronchial secretions aspiration” was excluded registering 48.2% “not seen”-marked. As for Z-UTI (n = 607 obs.) compliance was 92,5% (excluded: 4 standards with 78.2% “not seen”-marked). In Z-B (n = 988 obs.) compliance was 78.5% (excluded: 4 standards with 80.6% “not seen”-marked; 1 standard with 49.5% “not appropriate”-marked). Surveillance of projects by direct observation allows in-the-moment feedback but some recommendations could be checked as “not seen” due to observation's schedule. Lack of time and people involved could threaten surveillance. However, HAIs and MDR-B are a major public health problem to deal with. CONCLUSIONS: Study demonstrates good compliance of recommendations, existing standards with high “not seen” percentages. SWOT analysis gives guidance on doing effective surveillance. KEY MESSAGES: • Due to increasing concern of MDR-B acquisition and HAIs, is crucial to develop projects including evidence-based recommendations to prevent this major public health problem. • Once we develop a strategy we must become able to monitor it and moreover, evaluate how we are doing surveillance in order to improve and make changes if necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597142
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105971422023-10-25 Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method Erro-Iturri, B Loroño-Ortiz, G Jiménez-Onsurbe, M Carbajal-Domínguez, S Gonzalez de Viñaspre-Remirez, I De Luz-Sanchez, Y Hernandez-Gonzalez, A Barberena-Iriarte, C Rico-Pisuerga, M A Páramo-Andrés, S Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: The multimodal projects: “Zero Urinary Tract Infection” (Z-UTI), “Zero Resistance” (Z-R), “Zero Pneumonia” (Z-P) and “Zero Bacteraemia” (Z-B) consist in implementing a bundle of evidence-based recommendations to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and acquisition of multidrug-resistant bacteria (MDR-B) during patient's intensive care unit stay. They have been instituted in our tertiary hospital for several years and in order to assess compliance, we perform surveillance based on direct observation checklist. The aim was to examine compliance of recommendations and to evaluate direct observation as surveillance method. METHODS: Descriptive analysis of audits performed between 2020-2022. Compliance was estimated as the average of “yes”-marked percentage. Recommendations with “yes”-marked below 50% were excluded. Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis of direct observation checklist was conducted. RESULTS: Regarding Z-R (n = 129 observations) compliance was 86.5%.”Giving information about isolation to family” was excluded registering 55.4% “not seen”-marked. In Z-P (n = 262 obs.) compliance was 82.3%. “Hand hygiene and sterile technique for bronchial secretions aspiration” was excluded registering 48.2% “not seen”-marked. As for Z-UTI (n = 607 obs.) compliance was 92,5% (excluded: 4 standards with 78.2% “not seen”-marked). In Z-B (n = 988 obs.) compliance was 78.5% (excluded: 4 standards with 80.6% “not seen”-marked; 1 standard with 49.5% “not appropriate”-marked). Surveillance of projects by direct observation allows in-the-moment feedback but some recommendations could be checked as “not seen” due to observation's schedule. Lack of time and people involved could threaten surveillance. However, HAIs and MDR-B are a major public health problem to deal with. CONCLUSIONS: Study demonstrates good compliance of recommendations, existing standards with high “not seen” percentages. SWOT analysis gives guidance on doing effective surveillance. KEY MESSAGES: • Due to increasing concern of MDR-B acquisition and HAIs, is crucial to develop projects including evidence-based recommendations to prevent this major public health problem. • Once we develop a strategy we must become able to monitor it and moreover, evaluate how we are doing surveillance in order to improve and make changes if necessary. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10597142/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1494 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Erro-Iturri, B
Loroño-Ortiz, G
Jiménez-Onsurbe, M
Carbajal-Domínguez, S
Gonzalez de Viñaspre-Remirez, I
De Luz-Sanchez, Y
Hernandez-Gonzalez, A
Barberena-Iriarte, C
Rico-Pisuerga, M A
Páramo-Andrés, S
Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
title Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
title_full Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
title_fullStr Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
title_full_unstemmed Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
title_short Zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
title_sort zero projects: compliance and evaluation of direct observation checklist as surveillance method
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597142/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1494
work_keys_str_mv AT erroiturrib zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT loronoortizg zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT jimenezonsurbem zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT carbajaldominguezs zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT gonzalezdevinaspreremirezi zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT deluzsanchezy zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT hernandezgonzaleza zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT barberenairiartec zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT ricopisuergama zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod
AT paramoandress zeroprojectscomplianceandevaluationofdirectobservationchecklistassurveillancemethod