Cargando…

Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery

OBJECTIVES: High workloads and stress of healthcare workforce are global phenomena. We aimed to study work related stress and recovery of nurses with both subjective and objective methods, also aiming to examine if associations exist between subjective high work stress and need for recovery, and obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rantanen, N, Sanmark, E, Oksanen, L-M, Lieslehto, J, Myllymäki, T, Geneid, A, Lallukka, T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597224/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1496
_version_ 1785125293320568832
author Rantanen, N
Sanmark, E
Oksanen, L-M
Lieslehto, J
Myllymäki, T
Geneid, A
Lallukka, T
author_facet Rantanen, N
Sanmark, E
Oksanen, L-M
Lieslehto, J
Myllymäki, T
Geneid, A
Lallukka, T
author_sort Rantanen, N
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: High workloads and stress of healthcare workforce are global phenomena. We aimed to study work related stress and recovery of nurses with both subjective and objective methods, also aiming to examine if associations exist between subjective high work stress and need for recovery, and objectively measured stress and recovery. METHODS: Study sample comprised 65 nurses employed in the City of Helsinki. Heart rate variability (HRV) measurements were conducted for 3 consecutive days with ECG-based device in real-life setting, including 2 workdays and 1 day off. Objective stress and recovery were assessed from HRV and HRV-based stress and recovery variables. Participants filled out an electronic survey, where work stress was measured with Effort-reward imbalance scale and recovery after work with Need for recovery scale. RESULTS: Proportion of nurses with effort-reward ratio >1, indicating work stress, was high (84.6%), as was proportion of those with high need for recovery (64.6%). High need for recovery (score ≥54.5) was associated with lower RMSSD during sleep (p = 0.014) and higher absolute stress index (p = 0.009) on workdays. In high need for recovery group, stress balance (p = 0.040) and relaxation percentage (p = 0.033) were significantly lower on workdays than day off. In moderate work stress group, stress balance (p = 0.042), relaxation percentage (p = 0.041) and absolute relaxation index (p = 0.035) were lower on workdays than day off. No significant differences were observed within other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of participants suffered from work stress or high need for recovery. Based on our results, nurses’ high need for recovery is reflected in lower sleep time HRV, indicating worse physiological recovery. In those with high need for recovery, physiological recovery was also worse on workdays when compared with day off. Our findings highlight the importance of recovery, and in the future, nurses’ recovery and work stress should be increasingly monitored. KEY MESSAGES: • Nurses’ high need for recovery is reflected in lower sleep time heart rate variability. • Nurses’ recovery and work stress should be increasingly monitored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105972242023-10-25 Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery Rantanen, N Sanmark, E Oksanen, L-M Lieslehto, J Myllymäki, T Geneid, A Lallukka, T Eur J Public Health Poster Displays OBJECTIVES: High workloads and stress of healthcare workforce are global phenomena. We aimed to study work related stress and recovery of nurses with both subjective and objective methods, also aiming to examine if associations exist between subjective high work stress and need for recovery, and objectively measured stress and recovery. METHODS: Study sample comprised 65 nurses employed in the City of Helsinki. Heart rate variability (HRV) measurements were conducted for 3 consecutive days with ECG-based device in real-life setting, including 2 workdays and 1 day off. Objective stress and recovery were assessed from HRV and HRV-based stress and recovery variables. Participants filled out an electronic survey, where work stress was measured with Effort-reward imbalance scale and recovery after work with Need for recovery scale. RESULTS: Proportion of nurses with effort-reward ratio >1, indicating work stress, was high (84.6%), as was proportion of those with high need for recovery (64.6%). High need for recovery (score ≥54.5) was associated with lower RMSSD during sleep (p = 0.014) and higher absolute stress index (p = 0.009) on workdays. In high need for recovery group, stress balance (p = 0.040) and relaxation percentage (p = 0.033) were significantly lower on workdays than day off. In moderate work stress group, stress balance (p = 0.042), relaxation percentage (p = 0.041) and absolute relaxation index (p = 0.035) were lower on workdays than day off. No significant differences were observed within other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Majority of participants suffered from work stress or high need for recovery. Based on our results, nurses’ high need for recovery is reflected in lower sleep time HRV, indicating worse physiological recovery. In those with high need for recovery, physiological recovery was also worse on workdays when compared with day off. Our findings highlight the importance of recovery, and in the future, nurses’ recovery and work stress should be increasingly monitored. KEY MESSAGES: • Nurses’ high need for recovery is reflected in lower sleep time heart rate variability. • Nurses’ recovery and work stress should be increasingly monitored. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10597224/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1496 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Rantanen, N
Sanmark, E
Oksanen, L-M
Lieslehto, J
Myllymäki, T
Geneid, A
Lallukka, T
Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
title Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
title_full Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
title_fullStr Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
title_full_unstemmed Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
title_short Subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
title_sort subjective and objective measurements of nurses’ stress and recovery
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597224/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1496
work_keys_str_mv AT rantanenn subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery
AT sanmarke subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery
AT oksanenlm subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery
AT lieslehtoj subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery
AT myllymakit subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery
AT geneida subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery
AT lallukkat subjectiveandobjectivemeasurementsofnursesstressandrecovery