Cargando…
Use and attitudes towards digital technologies in addiction rehabilitation in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
BACKGROUND: Before the start of the pandemic, digital technologies were hardly used in addiction rehabilitation in Germany - also due to the lack of a legal framework. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the funding agencies enabled their use. The aim of the study is to describe the use of and attitudes...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597291/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1595 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Before the start of the pandemic, digital technologies were hardly used in addiction rehabilitation in Germany - also due to the lack of a legal framework. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the funding agencies enabled their use. The aim of the study is to describe the use of and attitudes towards digital technologies in addiction rehabilitation from the perspective of both clinic management and rehabilitation patients. METHODS: Clinic management of all 1044 outpatient and inpatient addiction rehabilitation clinics in Germany were asked in summer 2022 to complete an online questionnaire on the use of and attitudes towards digital technologies in addiction treatment. 415 clinics provided answers (response rate 40%). In addition, 460 rehabilitation patients from 34 different clinics were questioned in written form (mean age 46.0 years (SD: 13.3), 73% male; 81% alcohol addiction). RESULTS: According to the clinic management, digitally conducted therapies were carried out in individual therapy (inpatient: 22% vs. outpatient 62%), group therapy (4% vs. 37%), family-oriented interventions (55% vs. 51%), and pre-admission interviews (45% vs. 45%). Among the rehabilitation patients, 10% in inpatient and 37% in outpatient rehabilitation stated that they had used digitally conducted therapies. 87% of the clinic management felt that digital therapy offers were useful during the pandemic, and 84% were in favour of using them beyond the pandemic. Among rehabilitation patients, the approval rate was 85% and 59% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Digital technologies were used for different therapy services in addiction rehabilitation. The majority of both clinic management and rehabilitation patients were in favour of this, even beyond the pandemic. For further use after the pandemic, the establishment of a legal, financial and organisational framework is required. Non-inferiority studies (comparing digital to face-to-face) could add to the evidence. KEY MESSAGES: • Digital technologies were used for therapeutic purposes (e.g. individual therapy, group therapy, family-oriented interventions) by a large proportion of addiction clinics during the pandemic. • The majority of clinic management and rehabilitation patients are in favour of the use of digital technologies in addiction rehabilitation even beyond the pandemic. |
---|