Cargando…

Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty

BACKGROUND: The UK news has been increasingly reporting of people forced to choose between “heating and eating.” The (self-)rationing of food and fuel has harmful health repercussions, yet the intersection food poverty and fuel (or energy) poverty has been largely neglected in academic literature. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Champagne, S N, Macdiarmid, J I, Phimister, E, Guntupalli, A M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597304/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1080
_version_ 1785125312603881472
author Champagne, S N
Macdiarmid, J I
Phimister, E
Guntupalli, A M
author_facet Champagne, S N
Macdiarmid, J I
Phimister, E
Guntupalli, A M
author_sort Champagne, S N
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The UK news has been increasingly reporting of people forced to choose between “heating and eating.” The (self-)rationing of food and fuel has harmful health repercussions, yet the intersection food poverty and fuel (or energy) poverty has been largely neglected in academic literature. This study looks to triangulate reports from the UK news and stakeholders in food and fuel poverty (FFP) mitigation to determine and compare how FFP is framed relationally between the sources. METHODS: Using the Nexis Lexis database, we searched for UK news articles on FFP, published between January 2010 and April 2022. Stakeholders in the FFP mitigation space, identified via hand-searching grey literature and snowball sampling, were interviewed between April and June 2023. Twenty interviews were conducted, and 185 news articles were included. Relying on framing analysis, extracted news data fragments and interview transcripts were thematically coded, analysed, and triangulated. RESULTS: Three descriptive frames of FFP were inductively identified across both data sources: 1) FFP is experienced as “trade-off” - a choice between heating and eating; 2) FFP is experienced as “mutual cutbacks” - an effort to reduce both necessities; 3) FFP is “not distinct” - the problem is income poverty. A fourth frame, that FFP is “situational” - it does not involve decisions but is a situation people find themselves in, only emerged from interviews. The UK news most prominently framed FFP as a “trade-off” (70%), followed by as a “mutual cutback” (29%), and rarely as “not distinct” (1%). Whereas stakeholders largely framed the issue as “mutual cutbacks” (45%), followed by as a “trade off” (30%), as “not distinct” (25%) and as “situational” (10%). CONCLUSIONS: The varied and mismatched framings between the news and stakeholders suggests that FFP is complex and potentially poorly understood. Centring the framing of people with lived FFP experience may help towards meaningfully tackling FFP. KEY MESSAGES: • Food and fuel poverty (FFP) is largely framed differently between the UK news and FFP mitigation stakeholders. • Centring the framing(s) of people with lived experience may help towards tackling FFP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105973042023-10-25 Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty Champagne, S N Macdiarmid, J I Phimister, E Guntupalli, A M Eur J Public Health Poster Displays BACKGROUND: The UK news has been increasingly reporting of people forced to choose between “heating and eating.” The (self-)rationing of food and fuel has harmful health repercussions, yet the intersection food poverty and fuel (or energy) poverty has been largely neglected in academic literature. This study looks to triangulate reports from the UK news and stakeholders in food and fuel poverty (FFP) mitigation to determine and compare how FFP is framed relationally between the sources. METHODS: Using the Nexis Lexis database, we searched for UK news articles on FFP, published between January 2010 and April 2022. Stakeholders in the FFP mitigation space, identified via hand-searching grey literature and snowball sampling, were interviewed between April and June 2023. Twenty interviews were conducted, and 185 news articles were included. Relying on framing analysis, extracted news data fragments and interview transcripts were thematically coded, analysed, and triangulated. RESULTS: Three descriptive frames of FFP were inductively identified across both data sources: 1) FFP is experienced as “trade-off” - a choice between heating and eating; 2) FFP is experienced as “mutual cutbacks” - an effort to reduce both necessities; 3) FFP is “not distinct” - the problem is income poverty. A fourth frame, that FFP is “situational” - it does not involve decisions but is a situation people find themselves in, only emerged from interviews. The UK news most prominently framed FFP as a “trade-off” (70%), followed by as a “mutual cutback” (29%), and rarely as “not distinct” (1%). Whereas stakeholders largely framed the issue as “mutual cutbacks” (45%), followed by as a “trade off” (30%), as “not distinct” (25%) and as “situational” (10%). CONCLUSIONS: The varied and mismatched framings between the news and stakeholders suggests that FFP is complex and potentially poorly understood. Centring the framing of people with lived FFP experience may help towards meaningfully tackling FFP. KEY MESSAGES: • Food and fuel poverty (FFP) is largely framed differently between the UK news and FFP mitigation stakeholders. • Centring the framing(s) of people with lived experience may help towards tackling FFP. Oxford University Press 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10597304/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1080 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Displays
Champagne, S N
Macdiarmid, J I
Phimister, E
Guntupalli, A M
Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty
title Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty
title_full Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty
title_fullStr Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty
title_full_unstemmed Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty
title_short Hungry and warm; cold and fed? The intersection of food and fuel poverty
title_sort hungry and warm; cold and fed? the intersection of food and fuel poverty
topic Poster Displays
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597304/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1080
work_keys_str_mv AT champagnesn hungryandwarmcoldandfedtheintersectionoffoodandfuelpoverty
AT macdiarmidji hungryandwarmcoldandfedtheintersectionoffoodandfuelpoverty
AT phimistere hungryandwarmcoldandfedtheintersectionoffoodandfuelpoverty
AT guntupalliam hungryandwarmcoldandfedtheintersectionoffoodandfuelpoverty