Cargando…

Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study

INTRODUCTION: Anterior-posterior discrepancy assessment is a crucial component of orthodontic diagnosis and is often carried out using hard tissue cephalometric analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle with established cephalo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebekah, R, Jain, Ravindra Kumar, Balasubramaniam, Arthi, Sreenivasagan, Swapna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37881674
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_7_23
_version_ 1785125324987564032
author Rebekah, R
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
Balasubramaniam, Arthi
Sreenivasagan, Swapna
author_facet Rebekah, R
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
Balasubramaniam, Arthi
Sreenivasagan, Swapna
author_sort Rebekah, R
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Anterior-posterior discrepancy assessment is a crucial component of orthodontic diagnosis and is often carried out using hard tissue cephalometric analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle with established cephalometric parameters to determine the accuracy of the angle in determining maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 60 subjects, 20 in each skeletal sagittal malocclusion, were included in the final sample based on the selection criteria. Both photographic and cephalometric records were taken, and the parameters assessed were the beta angle, Steiner's analysis, the ANB (A point- Nasion- B point) angle in the cephalograms, and the FSA angle in the profile photographs. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software. The correlation between the measured parameters was assessed using Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: A high positive and significant correlation between the FSA angle and beta angle (r = 0.793) was noted, and a high negative and significant correlation between the FSA angle and ANB angle (r = -0.848) was noted. CONCLUSION: The photographic FSA angle can be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose anteroposterior discrepancies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105973712023-10-25 Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study Rebekah, R Jain, Ravindra Kumar Balasubramaniam, Arthi Sreenivasagan, Swapna J Orthod Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Anterior-posterior discrepancy assessment is a crucial component of orthodontic diagnosis and is often carried out using hard tissue cephalometric analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare the photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle with established cephalometric parameters to determine the accuracy of the angle in determining maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 60 subjects, 20 in each skeletal sagittal malocclusion, were included in the final sample based on the selection criteria. Both photographic and cephalometric records were taken, and the parameters assessed were the beta angle, Steiner's analysis, the ANB (A point- Nasion- B point) angle in the cephalograms, and the FSA angle in the profile photographs. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS software. The correlation between the measured parameters was assessed using Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS: A high positive and significant correlation between the FSA angle and beta angle (r = 0.793) was noted, and a high negative and significant correlation between the FSA angle and ANB angle (r = -0.848) was noted. CONCLUSION: The photographic FSA angle can be used as a reliable parameter to diagnose anteroposterior discrepancies. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10597371/ /pubmed/37881674 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_7_23 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Orthodontic Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rebekah, R
Jain, Ravindra Kumar
Balasubramaniam, Arthi
Sreenivasagan, Swapna
Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study
title Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study
title_full Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study
title_fullStr Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study
title_short Photographic Frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (FSA) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: A prospective study
title_sort photographic frankfort plane subnasale pogonion (fsa) angle for assessment of anteroposterior discrepancies in malocclusion subjects: a prospective study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37881674
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_7_23
work_keys_str_mv AT rebekahr photographicfrankfortplanesubnasalepogonionfsaangleforassessmentofanteroposteriordiscrepanciesinmalocclusionsubjectsaprospectivestudy
AT jainravindrakumar photographicfrankfortplanesubnasalepogonionfsaangleforassessmentofanteroposteriordiscrepanciesinmalocclusionsubjectsaprospectivestudy
AT balasubramaniamarthi photographicfrankfortplanesubnasalepogonionfsaangleforassessmentofanteroposteriordiscrepanciesinmalocclusionsubjectsaprospectivestudy
AT sreenivasaganswapna photographicfrankfortplanesubnasalepogonionfsaangleforassessmentofanteroposteriordiscrepanciesinmalocclusionsubjectsaprospectivestudy