Cargando…
Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
INTRODUCTION: Screening for G6PD deficiency can inform disease management including malaria. Treatment with the antimalarial drugs primaquine and tafenoquine can be guided by point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from similar clinical studies evaluating the performanc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011652 |
_version_ | 1785125353902047232 |
---|---|
author | Adissu, Wondimagegn Brito, Marcelo Garbin, Eduardo Macedo, Marcela Monteiro, Wuelton Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar Myburg, Jane Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Bancone, Germana Bansil, Pooja Pal, Sampa Sharma, Abhijit Zobrist, Stephanie Bryan, Andrew Chu, Cindy S. Das, Santasabuj Domingo, Gonzalo J. Hann, Amanda Kublin, James Lacerda, Marcus V. G. Layton, Mark Ley, Benedikt Murphy, Sean C. Nosten, Francois Pereira, Dhélio Price, Ric N. Talukdar, Arunansu Yilma, Daniel Gerth-Guyette, Emily |
author_facet | Adissu, Wondimagegn Brito, Marcelo Garbin, Eduardo Macedo, Marcela Monteiro, Wuelton Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar Myburg, Jane Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Bancone, Germana Bansil, Pooja Pal, Sampa Sharma, Abhijit Zobrist, Stephanie Bryan, Andrew Chu, Cindy S. Das, Santasabuj Domingo, Gonzalo J. Hann, Amanda Kublin, James Lacerda, Marcus V. G. Layton, Mark Ley, Benedikt Murphy, Sean C. Nosten, Francois Pereira, Dhélio Price, Ric N. Talukdar, Arunansu Yilma, Daniel Gerth-Guyette, Emily |
author_sort | Adissu, Wondimagegn |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Screening for G6PD deficiency can inform disease management including malaria. Treatment with the antimalarial drugs primaquine and tafenoquine can be guided by point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from similar clinical studies evaluating the performance of the STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, South Korea) conducted in Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States were pooled. Test performance was assessed in a retrospective analysis on capillary and venous specimens. All study sites used spectrophotometry for reference G6PD testing, and either the HemoCue or complete blood count for reference hemoglobin measurement. The sensitivity of the STANDARD G6PD Test using the manufacturer thresholds for G6PD deficient and intermediate cases in capillary specimens from 4212 study participants was 100% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 97.5%–100%) for G6PD deficient cases with <30% activity and 77% (95% CI 66.8%–85.4%) for females with intermediate activity between 30%–70%. Specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 97.6%–98.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.6%–93.9%) for G6PD deficient individuals and intermediate females, respectively. Out of 20 G6PD intermediate females with false normal results, 12 had activity levels >60% on the reference assay. The negative predictive value for females with G6PD activity >60% was 99.6% (95% CI 99.1%–99.8%) on capillary specimens. Sensitivity among 396 P. vivax malaria cases was 100% (69.2%–100.0%) for both deficient and intermediate cases. Across the full dataset, 37% of those classified as G6PD deficient or intermediate resulted from true normal cases. Despite this, over 95% of cases would receive correct treatment with primaquine, over 87% of cases would receive correct treatment with tafenoquine, and no true G6PD deficient cases would be treated inappropriately based on the result of the STANDARD G6PD Test. CONCLUSIONS: The STANDARD G6PD Test enables safe access to drugs which are contraindicated for individuals with G6PD deficiency. Operational considerations will inform test uptake in specific settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10597494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105974942023-10-25 Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis Adissu, Wondimagegn Brito, Marcelo Garbin, Eduardo Macedo, Marcela Monteiro, Wuelton Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar Myburg, Jane Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Bancone, Germana Bansil, Pooja Pal, Sampa Sharma, Abhijit Zobrist, Stephanie Bryan, Andrew Chu, Cindy S. Das, Santasabuj Domingo, Gonzalo J. Hann, Amanda Kublin, James Lacerda, Marcus V. G. Layton, Mark Ley, Benedikt Murphy, Sean C. Nosten, Francois Pereira, Dhélio Price, Ric N. Talukdar, Arunansu Yilma, Daniel Gerth-Guyette, Emily PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article INTRODUCTION: Screening for G6PD deficiency can inform disease management including malaria. Treatment with the antimalarial drugs primaquine and tafenoquine can be guided by point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from similar clinical studies evaluating the performance of the STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, South Korea) conducted in Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States were pooled. Test performance was assessed in a retrospective analysis on capillary and venous specimens. All study sites used spectrophotometry for reference G6PD testing, and either the HemoCue or complete blood count for reference hemoglobin measurement. The sensitivity of the STANDARD G6PD Test using the manufacturer thresholds for G6PD deficient and intermediate cases in capillary specimens from 4212 study participants was 100% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 97.5%–100%) for G6PD deficient cases with <30% activity and 77% (95% CI 66.8%–85.4%) for females with intermediate activity between 30%–70%. Specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 97.6%–98.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.6%–93.9%) for G6PD deficient individuals and intermediate females, respectively. Out of 20 G6PD intermediate females with false normal results, 12 had activity levels >60% on the reference assay. The negative predictive value for females with G6PD activity >60% was 99.6% (95% CI 99.1%–99.8%) on capillary specimens. Sensitivity among 396 P. vivax malaria cases was 100% (69.2%–100.0%) for both deficient and intermediate cases. Across the full dataset, 37% of those classified as G6PD deficient or intermediate resulted from true normal cases. Despite this, over 95% of cases would receive correct treatment with primaquine, over 87% of cases would receive correct treatment with tafenoquine, and no true G6PD deficient cases would be treated inappropriately based on the result of the STANDARD G6PD Test. CONCLUSIONS: The STANDARD G6PD Test enables safe access to drugs which are contraindicated for individuals with G6PD deficiency. Operational considerations will inform test uptake in specific settings. Public Library of Science 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10597494/ /pubmed/37824592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011652 Text en © 2023 Adissu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Adissu, Wondimagegn Brito, Marcelo Garbin, Eduardo Macedo, Marcela Monteiro, Wuelton Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar Myburg, Jane Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Bancone, Germana Bansil, Pooja Pal, Sampa Sharma, Abhijit Zobrist, Stephanie Bryan, Andrew Chu, Cindy S. Das, Santasabuj Domingo, Gonzalo J. Hann, Amanda Kublin, James Lacerda, Marcus V. G. Layton, Mark Ley, Benedikt Murphy, Sean C. Nosten, Francois Pereira, Dhélio Price, Ric N. Talukdar, Arunansu Yilma, Daniel Gerth-Guyette, Emily Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis |
title | Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis |
title_full | Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis |
title_short | Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis |
title_sort | clinical performance validation of the standard g6pd test: a multi-country pooled analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adissuwondimagegn clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT britomarcelo clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT garbineduardo clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT macedomarcela clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT monteirowuelton clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT mukherjeesandipkumar clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT myburgjane clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT alammohammadshafiul clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT banconegermana clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT bansilpooja clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT palsampa clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT sharmaabhijit clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT zobriststephanie clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT bryanandrew clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT chucindys clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT dassantasabuj clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT domingogonzaloj clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT hannamanda clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT kublinjames clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT lacerdamarcusvg clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT laytonmark clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT leybenedikt clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT murphyseanc clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT nostenfrancois clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT pereiradhelio clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT pricericn clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT talukdararunansu clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT yilmadaniel clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis AT gerthguyetteemily clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis |