Cargando…

Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis

INTRODUCTION: Screening for G6PD deficiency can inform disease management including malaria. Treatment with the antimalarial drugs primaquine and tafenoquine can be guided by point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from similar clinical studies evaluating the performanc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adissu, Wondimagegn, Brito, Marcelo, Garbin, Eduardo, Macedo, Marcela, Monteiro, Wuelton, Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar, Myburg, Jane, Alam, Mohammad Shafiul, Bancone, Germana, Bansil, Pooja, Pal, Sampa, Sharma, Abhijit, Zobrist, Stephanie, Bryan, Andrew, Chu, Cindy S., Das, Santasabuj, Domingo, Gonzalo J., Hann, Amanda, Kublin, James, Lacerda, Marcus V. G., Layton, Mark, Ley, Benedikt, Murphy, Sean C., Nosten, Francois, Pereira, Dhélio, Price, Ric N., Talukdar, Arunansu, Yilma, Daniel, Gerth-Guyette, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011652
_version_ 1785125353902047232
author Adissu, Wondimagegn
Brito, Marcelo
Garbin, Eduardo
Macedo, Marcela
Monteiro, Wuelton
Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar
Myburg, Jane
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
Bancone, Germana
Bansil, Pooja
Pal, Sampa
Sharma, Abhijit
Zobrist, Stephanie
Bryan, Andrew
Chu, Cindy S.
Das, Santasabuj
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Hann, Amanda
Kublin, James
Lacerda, Marcus V. G.
Layton, Mark
Ley, Benedikt
Murphy, Sean C.
Nosten, Francois
Pereira, Dhélio
Price, Ric N.
Talukdar, Arunansu
Yilma, Daniel
Gerth-Guyette, Emily
author_facet Adissu, Wondimagegn
Brito, Marcelo
Garbin, Eduardo
Macedo, Marcela
Monteiro, Wuelton
Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar
Myburg, Jane
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
Bancone, Germana
Bansil, Pooja
Pal, Sampa
Sharma, Abhijit
Zobrist, Stephanie
Bryan, Andrew
Chu, Cindy S.
Das, Santasabuj
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Hann, Amanda
Kublin, James
Lacerda, Marcus V. G.
Layton, Mark
Ley, Benedikt
Murphy, Sean C.
Nosten, Francois
Pereira, Dhélio
Price, Ric N.
Talukdar, Arunansu
Yilma, Daniel
Gerth-Guyette, Emily
author_sort Adissu, Wondimagegn
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Screening for G6PD deficiency can inform disease management including malaria. Treatment with the antimalarial drugs primaquine and tafenoquine can be guided by point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from similar clinical studies evaluating the performance of the STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, South Korea) conducted in Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States were pooled. Test performance was assessed in a retrospective analysis on capillary and venous specimens. All study sites used spectrophotometry for reference G6PD testing, and either the HemoCue or complete blood count for reference hemoglobin measurement. The sensitivity of the STANDARD G6PD Test using the manufacturer thresholds for G6PD deficient and intermediate cases in capillary specimens from 4212 study participants was 100% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 97.5%–100%) for G6PD deficient cases with <30% activity and 77% (95% CI 66.8%–85.4%) for females with intermediate activity between 30%–70%. Specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 97.6%–98.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.6%–93.9%) for G6PD deficient individuals and intermediate females, respectively. Out of 20 G6PD intermediate females with false normal results, 12 had activity levels >60% on the reference assay. The negative predictive value for females with G6PD activity >60% was 99.6% (95% CI 99.1%–99.8%) on capillary specimens. Sensitivity among 396 P. vivax malaria cases was 100% (69.2%–100.0%) for both deficient and intermediate cases. Across the full dataset, 37% of those classified as G6PD deficient or intermediate resulted from true normal cases. Despite this, over 95% of cases would receive correct treatment with primaquine, over 87% of cases would receive correct treatment with tafenoquine, and no true G6PD deficient cases would be treated inappropriately based on the result of the STANDARD G6PD Test. CONCLUSIONS: The STANDARD G6PD Test enables safe access to drugs which are contraindicated for individuals with G6PD deficiency. Operational considerations will inform test uptake in specific settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105974942023-10-25 Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis Adissu, Wondimagegn Brito, Marcelo Garbin, Eduardo Macedo, Marcela Monteiro, Wuelton Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar Myburg, Jane Alam, Mohammad Shafiul Bancone, Germana Bansil, Pooja Pal, Sampa Sharma, Abhijit Zobrist, Stephanie Bryan, Andrew Chu, Cindy S. Das, Santasabuj Domingo, Gonzalo J. Hann, Amanda Kublin, James Lacerda, Marcus V. G. Layton, Mark Ley, Benedikt Murphy, Sean C. Nosten, Francois Pereira, Dhélio Price, Ric N. Talukdar, Arunansu Yilma, Daniel Gerth-Guyette, Emily PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article INTRODUCTION: Screening for G6PD deficiency can inform disease management including malaria. Treatment with the antimalarial drugs primaquine and tafenoquine can be guided by point-of-care testing for G6PD deficiency. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data from similar clinical studies evaluating the performance of the STANDARD G6PD Test (SD Biosensor, South Korea) conducted in Bangladesh, Brazil, Ethiopia, India, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States were pooled. Test performance was assessed in a retrospective analysis on capillary and venous specimens. All study sites used spectrophotometry for reference G6PD testing, and either the HemoCue or complete blood count for reference hemoglobin measurement. The sensitivity of the STANDARD G6PD Test using the manufacturer thresholds for G6PD deficient and intermediate cases in capillary specimens from 4212 study participants was 100% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 97.5%–100%) for G6PD deficient cases with <30% activity and 77% (95% CI 66.8%–85.4%) for females with intermediate activity between 30%–70%. Specificity was 98.1% (95% CI 97.6%–98.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.6%–93.9%) for G6PD deficient individuals and intermediate females, respectively. Out of 20 G6PD intermediate females with false normal results, 12 had activity levels >60% on the reference assay. The negative predictive value for females with G6PD activity >60% was 99.6% (95% CI 99.1%–99.8%) on capillary specimens. Sensitivity among 396 P. vivax malaria cases was 100% (69.2%–100.0%) for both deficient and intermediate cases. Across the full dataset, 37% of those classified as G6PD deficient or intermediate resulted from true normal cases. Despite this, over 95% of cases would receive correct treatment with primaquine, over 87% of cases would receive correct treatment with tafenoquine, and no true G6PD deficient cases would be treated inappropriately based on the result of the STANDARD G6PD Test. CONCLUSIONS: The STANDARD G6PD Test enables safe access to drugs which are contraindicated for individuals with G6PD deficiency. Operational considerations will inform test uptake in specific settings. Public Library of Science 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10597494/ /pubmed/37824592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011652 Text en © 2023 Adissu et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Adissu, Wondimagegn
Brito, Marcelo
Garbin, Eduardo
Macedo, Marcela
Monteiro, Wuelton
Mukherjee, Sandip Kumar
Myburg, Jane
Alam, Mohammad Shafiul
Bancone, Germana
Bansil, Pooja
Pal, Sampa
Sharma, Abhijit
Zobrist, Stephanie
Bryan, Andrew
Chu, Cindy S.
Das, Santasabuj
Domingo, Gonzalo J.
Hann, Amanda
Kublin, James
Lacerda, Marcus V. G.
Layton, Mark
Ley, Benedikt
Murphy, Sean C.
Nosten, Francois
Pereira, Dhélio
Price, Ric N.
Talukdar, Arunansu
Yilma, Daniel
Gerth-Guyette, Emily
Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
title Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
title_full Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
title_fullStr Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
title_short Clinical performance validation of the STANDARD G6PD test: A multi-country pooled analysis
title_sort clinical performance validation of the standard g6pd test: a multi-country pooled analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37824592
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011652
work_keys_str_mv AT adissuwondimagegn clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT britomarcelo clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT garbineduardo clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT macedomarcela clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT monteirowuelton clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT mukherjeesandipkumar clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT myburgjane clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT alammohammadshafiul clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT banconegermana clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT bansilpooja clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT palsampa clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT sharmaabhijit clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT zobriststephanie clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT bryanandrew clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT chucindys clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT dassantasabuj clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT domingogonzaloj clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT hannamanda clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT kublinjames clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT lacerdamarcusvg clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT laytonmark clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT leybenedikt clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT murphyseanc clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT nostenfrancois clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT pereiradhelio clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT pricericn clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT talukdararunansu clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT yilmadaniel clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis
AT gerthguyetteemily clinicalperformancevalidationofthestandardg6pdtestamulticountrypooledanalysis