Cargando…

Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned

The recent increase in cell and gene therapies being developed has been coupled with a disproportionate increase in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-mandated clinical holds. Aiming to better understand causes and secondary effects of these clinical holds on biotechnology companies, we analyzed 33...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wills, Carolyn A., Drago, Daniela, Pietrusko, Robert G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.101125
_version_ 1785125418944167936
author Wills, Carolyn A.
Drago, Daniela
Pietrusko, Robert G.
author_facet Wills, Carolyn A.
Drago, Daniela
Pietrusko, Robert G.
author_sort Wills, Carolyn A.
collection PubMed
description The recent increase in cell and gene therapies being developed has been coupled with a disproportionate increase in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-mandated clinical holds. Aiming to better understand causes and secondary effects of these clinical holds on biotechnology companies, we analyzed 33 clinical holds that were publicly announced from January 2020 to December 2022. Approximately 80% of the analyzed clinical holds were formally lifted by the close of our study after an average of 6.2 months, and several trials have had significant clinical success following a hold. CAR T cell therapies accounted for nine holds, Lentiviral and AAV-based gene therapies accounted for five and 15 holds, respectively, and other cell and gene therapies accounted for four holds. The most common trigger was an adverse event or patient death. To remove a hold, protocol amendments were the most requested resolution by FDA. While there is no way to guarantee a therapy will not be placed on clinical hold, especially following unexpected adverse events, some deficiencies are avoidable. Utilizing FDA-provided resources on regulations and expectations for cell and gene therapy investigational new drug applications, inclusion of an external safety monitoring board, and a proactive risk assessment plan may prevent a clinical hold or result in a shortened duration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105977812023-10-26 Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned Wills, Carolyn A. Drago, Daniela Pietrusko, Robert G. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev Review The recent increase in cell and gene therapies being developed has been coupled with a disproportionate increase in Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-mandated clinical holds. Aiming to better understand causes and secondary effects of these clinical holds on biotechnology companies, we analyzed 33 clinical holds that were publicly announced from January 2020 to December 2022. Approximately 80% of the analyzed clinical holds were formally lifted by the close of our study after an average of 6.2 months, and several trials have had significant clinical success following a hold. CAR T cell therapies accounted for nine holds, Lentiviral and AAV-based gene therapies accounted for five and 15 holds, respectively, and other cell and gene therapies accounted for four holds. The most common trigger was an adverse event or patient death. To remove a hold, protocol amendments were the most requested resolution by FDA. While there is no way to guarantee a therapy will not be placed on clinical hold, especially following unexpected adverse events, some deficiencies are avoidable. Utilizing FDA-provided resources on regulations and expectations for cell and gene therapy investigational new drug applications, inclusion of an external safety monitoring board, and a proactive risk assessment plan may prevent a clinical hold or result in a shortened duration. American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy 2023-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10597781/ /pubmed/37886603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.101125 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Wills, Carolyn A.
Drago, Daniela
Pietrusko, Robert G.
Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
title Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
title_full Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
title_fullStr Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
title_short Clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: Risks, impact, and lessons learned
title_sort clinical holds for cell and gene therapy trials: risks, impact, and lessons learned
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2023.101125
work_keys_str_mv AT willscarolyna clinicalholdsforcellandgenetherapytrialsrisksimpactandlessonslearned
AT dragodaniela clinicalholdsforcellandgenetherapytrialsrisksimpactandlessonslearned
AT pietruskorobertg clinicalholdsforcellandgenetherapytrialsrisksimpactandlessonslearned