Cargando…
False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the total number of false-positive recalls, including radiographic appearances and false-positive biopsies, in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST). METHODS: The prospective, population-based MBTST, with 14,848 participating women, was designed to compare on...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09705-x |
_version_ | 1785125439999574016 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Kristin Olinder, Jakob Rosso, Aldana Andersson, Ingvar Lång, Kristina Zackrisson, Sophia |
author_facet | Johnson, Kristin Olinder, Jakob Rosso, Aldana Andersson, Ingvar Lång, Kristina Zackrisson, Sophia |
author_sort | Johnson, Kristin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the total number of false-positive recalls, including radiographic appearances and false-positive biopsies, in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST). METHODS: The prospective, population-based MBTST, with 14,848 participating women, was designed to compare one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-view digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. False-positive recall rates, radiographic appearances, and biopsy rates were analyzed. Comparisons were made between DBT, DM, and DBT + DM, both in total and in trial year 1 compared to trial years 2 to 5, with numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The false-positive recall rate was higher with DBT, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4; 1.8), compared to screening with DM, 0.8% (95% CI 0.7; 1.0). The proportion of the radiographic appearance of stellate distortion was 37.3% (91/244) with DBT, compared to 24.0% (29/121) with DM. The false-positive recall rate with DBT during trial year 1 was 2.6% (95% CI 1.8; 3.5), then stabilized at 1.5% (95% CI 1.3; 1.8) during trial years 2 to 5. The percentage of stellate distortion with DBT was 50% (19/38) trial year 1 compared to 35.0% (72/206) trial years 2 to 5. CONCLUSIONS: The higher false-positive recall rate with DBT compared to DM was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings. The proportion of these findings, as well as the DBT false-positive recall rate, was reduced after the first trial year. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Assessment of false-positive recalls gives information on potential benefits and side effects in DBT screening. KEY POINTS: • The false-positive recall rate in a prospective digital breast tomosynthesis screening trial was higher compared to digital mammography, but still low compared to other trials. • The higher false-positive recall rate with digital breast tomosynthesis was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings; the proportion of these findings was reduced after the first trial year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10597871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105978712023-10-26 False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial Johnson, Kristin Olinder, Jakob Rosso, Aldana Andersson, Ingvar Lång, Kristina Zackrisson, Sophia Eur Radiol Breast OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the total number of false-positive recalls, including radiographic appearances and false-positive biopsies, in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST). METHODS: The prospective, population-based MBTST, with 14,848 participating women, was designed to compare one-view digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-view digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. False-positive recall rates, radiographic appearances, and biopsy rates were analyzed. Comparisons were made between DBT, DM, and DBT + DM, both in total and in trial year 1 compared to trial years 2 to 5, with numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The false-positive recall rate was higher with DBT, 1.6% (95% CI 1.4; 1.8), compared to screening with DM, 0.8% (95% CI 0.7; 1.0). The proportion of the radiographic appearance of stellate distortion was 37.3% (91/244) with DBT, compared to 24.0% (29/121) with DM. The false-positive recall rate with DBT during trial year 1 was 2.6% (95% CI 1.8; 3.5), then stabilized at 1.5% (95% CI 1.3; 1.8) during trial years 2 to 5. The percentage of stellate distortion with DBT was 50% (19/38) trial year 1 compared to 35.0% (72/206) trial years 2 to 5. CONCLUSIONS: The higher false-positive recall rate with DBT compared to DM was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings. The proportion of these findings, as well as the DBT false-positive recall rate, was reduced after the first trial year. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Assessment of false-positive recalls gives information on potential benefits and side effects in DBT screening. KEY POINTS: • The false-positive recall rate in a prospective digital breast tomosynthesis screening trial was higher compared to digital mammography, but still low compared to other trials. • The higher false-positive recall rate with digital breast tomosynthesis was mainly due to an increased detection of stellate findings; the proportion of these findings was reduced after the first trial year. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-05-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10597871/ /pubmed/37145147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09705-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Johnson, Kristin Olinder, Jakob Rosso, Aldana Andersson, Ingvar Lång, Kristina Zackrisson, Sophia False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial |
title | False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial |
title_full | False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial |
title_fullStr | False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial |
title_short | False-positive recalls in the prospective Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial |
title_sort | false-positive recalls in the prospective malmö breast tomosynthesis screening trial |
topic | Breast |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37145147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09705-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonkristin falsepositiverecallsintheprospectivemalmobreasttomosynthesisscreeningtrial AT olinderjakob falsepositiverecallsintheprospectivemalmobreasttomosynthesisscreeningtrial AT rossoaldana falsepositiverecallsintheprospectivemalmobreasttomosynthesisscreeningtrial AT anderssoningvar falsepositiverecallsintheprospectivemalmobreasttomosynthesisscreeningtrial AT langkristina falsepositiverecallsintheprospectivemalmobreasttomosynthesisscreeningtrial AT zackrissonsophia falsepositiverecallsintheprospectivemalmobreasttomosynthesisscreeningtrial |