Cargando…

Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process

INTRODUCTION: The opinion of students is of utmost importance to identify areas of improvement in undergraduate studies. Medical schools would use this information to plan actions to ensure that the students achieve the necessary medical knowledge. The aim of this study was to analyse the opinion of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Montané, Eva, Vilaplana, Cristina, Riera, Joan, Pujol, Marina, Méndez, Maria, Mas, Albert, Vara, Angel, Parés, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01873-1
_version_ 1785125447879622656
author Montané, Eva
Vilaplana, Cristina
Riera, Joan
Pujol, Marina
Méndez, Maria
Mas, Albert
Vara, Angel
Parés, David
author_facet Montané, Eva
Vilaplana, Cristina
Riera, Joan
Pujol, Marina
Méndez, Maria
Mas, Albert
Vara, Angel
Parés, David
author_sort Montané, Eva
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The opinion of students is of utmost importance to identify areas of improvement in undergraduate studies. Medical schools would use this information to plan actions to ensure that the students achieve the necessary medical knowledge. The aim of this study was to analyse the opinion of medical students about their learning process and to analyse the influence of their experience according to their year of medical degree. METHODS: A questionnaire including 21 items, divided into four sections (motivation, theory lectures, hospital internships, and research) and two overall questions, was distributed among eligible 246 students. Each item was scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The opinions of intermediate-year students of medical degree (3rd and 4th) were compared to late-year students (5th and 6th). RESULTS: A total of 148 students answered the questionnaire (60.2% response rate). The mean scores for overall student motivation and teaching quality were 6.15 and 7.10, respectively. The student–teacher interaction and new learning technological tools were considered important for student motivation. The only differences found between the two groups of students were that late-year students wished to become part of a medical team and to learn writing scientific papers more than the intermediate-year students. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire revealed that the year of career had little influence on the medical students’ opinion on their learning process during their undergraduate studies. Late-year students rated highest on being more interested in being part of a medical team and their knowledge on writing scientific articles. The use of new technologies and the student–teacher interaction is key to motivate students.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10597930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105979302023-10-26 Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process Montané, Eva Vilaplana, Cristina Riera, Joan Pujol, Marina Méndez, Maria Mas, Albert Vara, Angel Parés, David Med Sci Educ Original Research INTRODUCTION: The opinion of students is of utmost importance to identify areas of improvement in undergraduate studies. Medical schools would use this information to plan actions to ensure that the students achieve the necessary medical knowledge. The aim of this study was to analyse the opinion of medical students about their learning process and to analyse the influence of their experience according to their year of medical degree. METHODS: A questionnaire including 21 items, divided into four sections (motivation, theory lectures, hospital internships, and research) and two overall questions, was distributed among eligible 246 students. Each item was scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The opinions of intermediate-year students of medical degree (3rd and 4th) were compared to late-year students (5th and 6th). RESULTS: A total of 148 students answered the questionnaire (60.2% response rate). The mean scores for overall student motivation and teaching quality were 6.15 and 7.10, respectively. The student–teacher interaction and new learning technological tools were considered important for student motivation. The only differences found between the two groups of students were that late-year students wished to become part of a medical team and to learn writing scientific papers more than the intermediate-year students. CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire revealed that the year of career had little influence on the medical students’ opinion on their learning process during their undergraduate studies. Late-year students rated highest on being more interested in being part of a medical team and their knowledge on writing scientific articles. The use of new technologies and the student–teacher interaction is key to motivate students. Springer US 2023-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10597930/ /pubmed/37886280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01873-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Montané, Eva
Vilaplana, Cristina
Riera, Joan
Pujol, Marina
Méndez, Maria
Mas, Albert
Vara, Angel
Parés, David
Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process
title Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process
title_full Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process
title_fullStr Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process
title_full_unstemmed Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process
title_short Medical Students’ Opinion of Their Learning Process
title_sort medical students’ opinion of their learning process
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01873-1
work_keys_str_mv AT montaneeva medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT vilaplanacristina medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT rierajoan medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT pujolmarina medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT mendezmaria medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT masalbert medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT varaangel medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess
AT paresdavid medicalstudentsopinionoftheirlearningprocess