Cargando…
Combining deep learning with a kinetic model to predict dynamic PET images and generate parametric images
BACKGROUND: Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) images are useful in clinical practice because they can be used to calculate the metabolic parameters (K(i)) of tissues using graphical methods (such as Patlak plots). K(i) is more stable than the standard uptake value and has a good reference v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10597982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37874426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00579-y |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) images are useful in clinical practice because they can be used to calculate the metabolic parameters (K(i)) of tissues using graphical methods (such as Patlak plots). K(i) is more stable than the standard uptake value and has a good reference value for clinical diagnosis. However, the long scanning time required for obtaining dynamic PET images, usually an hour, makes this method less useful in some ways. There is a tradeoff between the scan durations and the signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of K(i) images. The purpose of our study is to obtain approximately the same image as that produced by scanning for one hour in just half an hour, improving the SNRs of images obtained by scanning for 30 min and reducing the necessary 1-h scanning time for acquiring dynamic PET images. METHODS: In this paper, we use U-Net as a feature extractor to obtain feature vectors with a priori knowledge about the image structure of interest and then utilize a parameter generator to obtain five parameters for a two-tissue, three-compartment model and generate a time activity curve (TAC), which will become close to the original 1-h TAC through training. The above-generated dynamic PET image finally obtains the K(i) parameter image. RESULTS: A quantitative analysis showed that the network-generated K(i) parameter maps improved the structural similarity index measure and peak SNR by averages of 2.27% and 7.04%, respectively, and decreased the root mean square error (RMSE) by 16.3% compared to those generated with a scan time of 30 min. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method is feasible, and satisfactory PET quantification accuracy can be achieved using the proposed deep learning method. Further clinical validation is needed before implementing this approach in routine clinical applications. |
---|