Cargando…
Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study
Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention supporting people with serious mental illnesses. In this study, 15 IMR groups were assessed for fidelity and clinician competency to establish the implementation level of all IMR elements and explore complementarity of the IMR Trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37253901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01137-7 |
_version_ | 1785125496814567424 |
---|---|
author | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. |
author_facet | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. |
author_sort | Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention supporting people with serious mental illnesses. In this study, 15 IMR groups were assessed for fidelity and clinician competency to establish the implementation level of all IMR elements and explore complementarity of the IMR Treatment Integrity Scale (IT-IS) to the standard IMR Fidelity Scale. Use of the IT-IS was adapted, similar to the IMR Fidelity Scale. Descriptive statistics were applied. Implementation success of IMR elements varied widely on the IMR Fidelity Scale and IT-IS (M = 3.94, SD = 1.13, and M = 3.29, SD = 1.05, respectively). Twelve IMR elements (60%) were well-implemented, whereas eight (40%) were implemented insufficiently, including some critical cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., role-playing). The scales appeared largely complementary, though strongly correlated (r (13) = 0.74, p = 0.002). Providing all IMR elements adequately requires a variety of clinical skills. Specific additional training and supervision may be necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10598171 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105981712023-10-26 Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. Community Ment Health J Original Paper Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention supporting people with serious mental illnesses. In this study, 15 IMR groups were assessed for fidelity and clinician competency to establish the implementation level of all IMR elements and explore complementarity of the IMR Treatment Integrity Scale (IT-IS) to the standard IMR Fidelity Scale. Use of the IT-IS was adapted, similar to the IMR Fidelity Scale. Descriptive statistics were applied. Implementation success of IMR elements varied widely on the IMR Fidelity Scale and IT-IS (M = 3.94, SD = 1.13, and M = 3.29, SD = 1.05, respectively). Twelve IMR elements (60%) were well-implemented, whereas eight (40%) were implemented insufficiently, including some critical cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., role-playing). The scales appeared largely complementary, though strongly correlated (r (13) = 0.74, p = 0.002). Providing all IMR elements adequately requires a variety of clinical skills. Specific additional training and supervision may be necessary. Springer US 2023-05-30 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10598171/ /pubmed/37253901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01137-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan van Weeghel, Jaap Deen, Mathijs L. van Esveld, Emmie W. Kamperman, Astrid M. Mulder, Cornelis L. Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study |
title | Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study |
title_full | Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study |
title_fullStr | Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study |
title_short | Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study |
title_sort | fidelity and clinical competence in providing illness management and recovery: an explorative study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598171/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37253901 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10597-023-01137-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT roosenschoonbertjan fidelityandclinicalcompetenceinprovidingillnessmanagementandrecoveryanexplorativestudy AT vanweegheljaap fidelityandclinicalcompetenceinprovidingillnessmanagementandrecoveryanexplorativestudy AT deenmathijsl fidelityandclinicalcompetenceinprovidingillnessmanagementandrecoveryanexplorativestudy AT vanesveldemmiew fidelityandclinicalcompetenceinprovidingillnessmanagementandrecoveryanexplorativestudy AT kampermanastridm fidelityandclinicalcompetenceinprovidingillnessmanagementandrecoveryanexplorativestudy AT muldercornelisl fidelityandclinicalcompetenceinprovidingillnessmanagementandrecoveryanexplorativestudy |