Cargando…
Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization
In the past decade, there has been a sharp increase in publications describing applications of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical image analysis. However, recent reviews have warned of the lack of reproducibility of most such studies, which has impeded closer examination of the models a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45486-5 |
_version_ | 1785125516576030720 |
---|---|
author | Mateus, Pedro Volmer, Leroy Wee, Leonard Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Hoebers, Frank Dekker, Andre Bermejo, Inigo |
author_facet | Mateus, Pedro Volmer, Leroy Wee, Leonard Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Hoebers, Frank Dekker, Andre Bermejo, Inigo |
author_sort | Mateus, Pedro |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the past decade, there has been a sharp increase in publications describing applications of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical image analysis. However, recent reviews have warned of the lack of reproducibility of most such studies, which has impeded closer examination of the models and, in turn, their implementation in healthcare. On the other hand, the performance of these models is highly dependent on decisions on architecture and image pre-processing. In this work, we assess the reproducibility of three studies that use CNNs for head and neck cancer outcome prediction by attempting to reproduce the published results. In addition, we propose a new network structure and assess the impact of image pre-processing and model selection criteria on performance. We used two publicly available datasets: one with 298 patients for training and validation and another with 137 patients from a different institute for testing. All three studies failed to report elements required to reproduce their results thoroughly, mainly the image pre-processing steps and the random seed. Our model either outperforms or achieves similar performance to the existing models with considerably fewer parameters. We also observed that the pre-processing efforts significantly impact the model’s performance and that some model selection criteria may lead to suboptimal models. Although there have been improvements in the reproducibility of deep learning models, our work suggests that wider implementation of reporting standards is required to avoid a reproducibility crisis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10598263 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105982632023-10-26 Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization Mateus, Pedro Volmer, Leroy Wee, Leonard Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Hoebers, Frank Dekker, Andre Bermejo, Inigo Sci Rep Article In the past decade, there has been a sharp increase in publications describing applications of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in medical image analysis. However, recent reviews have warned of the lack of reproducibility of most such studies, which has impeded closer examination of the models and, in turn, their implementation in healthcare. On the other hand, the performance of these models is highly dependent on decisions on architecture and image pre-processing. In this work, we assess the reproducibility of three studies that use CNNs for head and neck cancer outcome prediction by attempting to reproduce the published results. In addition, we propose a new network structure and assess the impact of image pre-processing and model selection criteria on performance. We used two publicly available datasets: one with 298 patients for training and validation and another with 137 patients from a different institute for testing. All three studies failed to report elements required to reproduce their results thoroughly, mainly the image pre-processing steps and the random seed. Our model either outperforms or achieves similar performance to the existing models with considerably fewer parameters. We also observed that the pre-processing efforts significantly impact the model’s performance and that some model selection criteria may lead to suboptimal models. Although there have been improvements in the reproducibility of deep learning models, our work suggests that wider implementation of reporting standards is required to avoid a reproducibility crisis. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10598263/ /pubmed/37875663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45486-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Mateus, Pedro Volmer, Leroy Wee, Leonard Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. Hoebers, Frank Dekker, Andre Bermejo, Inigo Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
title | Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
title_full | Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
title_fullStr | Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
title_full_unstemmed | Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
title_short | Image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
title_sort | image based prognosis in head and neck cancer using convolutional neural networks: a case study in reproducibility and optimization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598263/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45486-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mateuspedro imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization AT volmerleroy imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization AT weeleonard imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization AT aertshugojwl imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization AT hoebersfrank imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization AT dekkerandre imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization AT bermejoinigo imagebasedprognosisinheadandneckcancerusingconvolutionalneuralnetworksacasestudyinreproducibilityandoptimization |