Cargando…
Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an important treatment option for severely obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remains inadequate data regarding the effects of different bariatric procedures on various NAFLD parameters, especially for histological ou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886204 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-520 |
_version_ | 1785125526931767296 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Wen Hui Lin, Snow Yunni Ng, Cheng Han Tan, Darren Jun Hao Xiao, Jieling Yong, Jie Ning Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin Syn, Nicholas Chin, Yip Han Chan, Kai En Khoo, Chin Meng Chew, Nicholas Foo, Roger S. Y. Shabbir, Asim Tan, Eunice X. Huang, Daniel Q. Noureddin, Mazen Sanyal, Arun J. Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab Muthiah, Mark D. |
author_facet | Lim, Wen Hui Lin, Snow Yunni Ng, Cheng Han Tan, Darren Jun Hao Xiao, Jieling Yong, Jie Ning Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin Syn, Nicholas Chin, Yip Han Chan, Kai En Khoo, Chin Meng Chew, Nicholas Foo, Roger S. Y. Shabbir, Asim Tan, Eunice X. Huang, Daniel Q. Noureddin, Mazen Sanyal, Arun J. Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab Muthiah, Mark D. |
author_sort | Lim, Wen Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an important treatment option for severely obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remains inadequate data regarding the effects of different bariatric procedures on various NAFLD parameters, especially for histological outcomes. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of restrictive bariatric procedures and foregut bypass on the metabolic, biochemical, and histological parameters for patients with NAFLD. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for articles relating to bariatric procedures and NAFLD. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of bariatric procedures pre- vs. post-procedure with subgroup analysis to further compare restrictive against foregut bypass procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles involving 3,355 patients who underwent restrictive bariatric procedures (n=1,460) and foregut bypass (n=1,895) were included. Both foregut bypass (P<0.01) and restrictive procedures (P=0.03) significantly increased odds of fibrosis resolution. Compared to restrictive procedures, foregut bypass resulted in a borderline non-significant decrease in fibrosis score (P=0.06) and significantly lower steatosis score (P<0.001). For metabolic parameters, foregut bypass significantly lowered body mass index (P=0.003) and low-density lipoprotein (P=0.008) compared to restrictive procedures. No significant differences were observed between both procedures for aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.17) and alkaline phosphatase (P=0.61). However, foregut bypass resulted in significantly lower gamma-glutamyl transferase than restrictive procedures (P=0.01) while restrictive procedures resulted in significantly lower alanine transaminase than foregut bypass (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The significant histological and metabolic advantages and comparable improvements in biochemical outcomes support the choice of foregut bypass over restrictive bariatric procedures in NAFLD management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10598314 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105983142023-10-26 Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals Lim, Wen Hui Lin, Snow Yunni Ng, Cheng Han Tan, Darren Jun Hao Xiao, Jieling Yong, Jie Ning Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin Syn, Nicholas Chin, Yip Han Chan, Kai En Khoo, Chin Meng Chew, Nicholas Foo, Roger S. Y. Shabbir, Asim Tan, Eunice X. Huang, Daniel Q. Noureddin, Mazen Sanyal, Arun J. Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab Muthiah, Mark D. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Original Article BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an important treatment option for severely obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remains inadequate data regarding the effects of different bariatric procedures on various NAFLD parameters, especially for histological outcomes. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of restrictive bariatric procedures and foregut bypass on the metabolic, biochemical, and histological parameters for patients with NAFLD. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for articles relating to bariatric procedures and NAFLD. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of bariatric procedures pre- vs. post-procedure with subgroup analysis to further compare restrictive against foregut bypass procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles involving 3,355 patients who underwent restrictive bariatric procedures (n=1,460) and foregut bypass (n=1,895) were included. Both foregut bypass (P<0.01) and restrictive procedures (P=0.03) significantly increased odds of fibrosis resolution. Compared to restrictive procedures, foregut bypass resulted in a borderline non-significant decrease in fibrosis score (P=0.06) and significantly lower steatosis score (P<0.001). For metabolic parameters, foregut bypass significantly lowered body mass index (P=0.003) and low-density lipoprotein (P=0.008) compared to restrictive procedures. No significant differences were observed between both procedures for aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.17) and alkaline phosphatase (P=0.61). However, foregut bypass resulted in significantly lower gamma-glutamyl transferase than restrictive procedures (P=0.01) while restrictive procedures resulted in significantly lower alanine transaminase than foregut bypass (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The significant histological and metabolic advantages and comparable improvements in biochemical outcomes support the choice of foregut bypass over restrictive bariatric procedures in NAFLD management. AME Publishing Company 2022-06-20 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10598314/ /pubmed/37886204 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-520 Text en 2023 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lim, Wen Hui Lin, Snow Yunni Ng, Cheng Han Tan, Darren Jun Hao Xiao, Jieling Yong, Jie Ning Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin Syn, Nicholas Chin, Yip Han Chan, Kai En Khoo, Chin Meng Chew, Nicholas Foo, Roger S. Y. Shabbir, Asim Tan, Eunice X. Huang, Daniel Q. Noureddin, Mazen Sanyal, Arun J. Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab Muthiah, Mark D. Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
title | Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
title_full | Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
title_fullStr | Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
title_full_unstemmed | Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
title_short | Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
title_sort | foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598314/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886204 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limwenhui foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT linsnowyunni foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT ngchenghan foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT tandarrenjunhao foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT xiaojieling foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT yongjiening foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT tayphoebewenlin foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT synnicholas foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT chinyiphan foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT chankaien foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT khoochinmeng foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT chewnicholas foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT foorogersy foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT shabbirasim foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT taneunicex foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT huangdanielq foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT noureddinmazen foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT sanyalarunj foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT siddiquimohammadshadab foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals AT muthiahmarkd foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals |