Cargando…

Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an important treatment option for severely obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remains inadequate data regarding the effects of different bariatric procedures on various NAFLD parameters, especially for histological ou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Wen Hui, Lin, Snow Yunni, Ng, Cheng Han, Tan, Darren Jun Hao, Xiao, Jieling, Yong, Jie Ning, Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin, Syn, Nicholas, Chin, Yip Han, Chan, Kai En, Khoo, Chin Meng, Chew, Nicholas, Foo, Roger S. Y., Shabbir, Asim, Tan, Eunice X., Huang, Daniel Q., Noureddin, Mazen, Sanyal, Arun J., Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab, Muthiah, Mark D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886204
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-520
_version_ 1785125526931767296
author Lim, Wen Hui
Lin, Snow Yunni
Ng, Cheng Han
Tan, Darren Jun Hao
Xiao, Jieling
Yong, Jie Ning
Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin
Syn, Nicholas
Chin, Yip Han
Chan, Kai En
Khoo, Chin Meng
Chew, Nicholas
Foo, Roger S. Y.
Shabbir, Asim
Tan, Eunice X.
Huang, Daniel Q.
Noureddin, Mazen
Sanyal, Arun J.
Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab
Muthiah, Mark D.
author_facet Lim, Wen Hui
Lin, Snow Yunni
Ng, Cheng Han
Tan, Darren Jun Hao
Xiao, Jieling
Yong, Jie Ning
Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin
Syn, Nicholas
Chin, Yip Han
Chan, Kai En
Khoo, Chin Meng
Chew, Nicholas
Foo, Roger S. Y.
Shabbir, Asim
Tan, Eunice X.
Huang, Daniel Q.
Noureddin, Mazen
Sanyal, Arun J.
Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab
Muthiah, Mark D.
author_sort Lim, Wen Hui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an important treatment option for severely obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remains inadequate data regarding the effects of different bariatric procedures on various NAFLD parameters, especially for histological outcomes. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of restrictive bariatric procedures and foregut bypass on the metabolic, biochemical, and histological parameters for patients with NAFLD. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for articles relating to bariatric procedures and NAFLD. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of bariatric procedures pre- vs. post-procedure with subgroup analysis to further compare restrictive against foregut bypass procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles involving 3,355 patients who underwent restrictive bariatric procedures (n=1,460) and foregut bypass (n=1,895) were included. Both foregut bypass (P<0.01) and restrictive procedures (P=0.03) significantly increased odds of fibrosis resolution. Compared to restrictive procedures, foregut bypass resulted in a borderline non-significant decrease in fibrosis score (P=0.06) and significantly lower steatosis score (P<0.001). For metabolic parameters, foregut bypass significantly lowered body mass index (P=0.003) and low-density lipoprotein (P=0.008) compared to restrictive procedures. No significant differences were observed between both procedures for aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.17) and alkaline phosphatase (P=0.61). However, foregut bypass resulted in significantly lower gamma-glutamyl transferase than restrictive procedures (P=0.01) while restrictive procedures resulted in significantly lower alanine transaminase than foregut bypass (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The significant histological and metabolic advantages and comparable improvements in biochemical outcomes support the choice of foregut bypass over restrictive bariatric procedures in NAFLD management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10598314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105983142023-10-26 Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals Lim, Wen Hui Lin, Snow Yunni Ng, Cheng Han Tan, Darren Jun Hao Xiao, Jieling Yong, Jie Ning Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin Syn, Nicholas Chin, Yip Han Chan, Kai En Khoo, Chin Meng Chew, Nicholas Foo, Roger S. Y. Shabbir, Asim Tan, Eunice X. Huang, Daniel Q. Noureddin, Mazen Sanyal, Arun J. Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab Muthiah, Mark D. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Original Article BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery represents an important treatment option for severely obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, there remains inadequate data regarding the effects of different bariatric procedures on various NAFLD parameters, especially for histological outcomes. Thus, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of restrictive bariatric procedures and foregut bypass on the metabolic, biochemical, and histological parameters for patients with NAFLD. METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched for articles relating to bariatric procedures and NAFLD. Pairwise meta-analysis was conducted to compare efficacy of bariatric procedures pre- vs. post-procedure with subgroup analysis to further compare restrictive against foregut bypass procedures. RESULTS: Thirty-one articles involving 3,355 patients who underwent restrictive bariatric procedures (n=1,460) and foregut bypass (n=1,895) were included. Both foregut bypass (P<0.01) and restrictive procedures (P=0.03) significantly increased odds of fibrosis resolution. Compared to restrictive procedures, foregut bypass resulted in a borderline non-significant decrease in fibrosis score (P=0.06) and significantly lower steatosis score (P<0.001). For metabolic parameters, foregut bypass significantly lowered body mass index (P=0.003) and low-density lipoprotein (P=0.008) compared to restrictive procedures. No significant differences were observed between both procedures for aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.17) and alkaline phosphatase (P=0.61). However, foregut bypass resulted in significantly lower gamma-glutamyl transferase than restrictive procedures (P=0.01) while restrictive procedures resulted in significantly lower alanine transaminase than foregut bypass (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The significant histological and metabolic advantages and comparable improvements in biochemical outcomes support the choice of foregut bypass over restrictive bariatric procedures in NAFLD management. AME Publishing Company 2022-06-20 2023-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10598314/ /pubmed/37886204 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-520 Text en 2023 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Lim, Wen Hui
Lin, Snow Yunni
Ng, Cheng Han
Tan, Darren Jun Hao
Xiao, Jieling
Yong, Jie Ning
Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin
Syn, Nicholas
Chin, Yip Han
Chan, Kai En
Khoo, Chin Meng
Chew, Nicholas
Foo, Roger S. Y.
Shabbir, Asim
Tan, Eunice X.
Huang, Daniel Q.
Noureddin, Mazen
Sanyal, Arun J.
Siddiqui, Mohammad Shadab
Muthiah, Mark D.
Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
title Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
title_full Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
title_fullStr Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
title_full_unstemmed Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
title_short Foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
title_sort foregut bypass vs. restrictive bariatric procedures for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis of 3,355 individuals
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886204
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-21-520
work_keys_str_mv AT limwenhui foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT linsnowyunni foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT ngchenghan foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT tandarrenjunhao foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT xiaojieling foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT yongjiening foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT tayphoebewenlin foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT synnicholas foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT chinyiphan foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT chankaien foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT khoochinmeng foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT chewnicholas foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT foorogersy foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT shabbirasim foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT taneunicex foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT huangdanielq foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT noureddinmazen foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT sanyalarunj foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT siddiquimohammadshadab foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals
AT muthiahmarkd foregutbypassvsrestrictivebariatricproceduresfornonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseametaanalysisof3355individuals