Cargando…

Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review

Acute exposure to hypoxia can lead to cognitive impairment. Therefore, hypoxia may become a safety concern for occupational or recreational settings at altitude. Cognitive tests are used as a tool to assess the degree to which hypoxia affects cognitive performance. However, so many different cogniti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Post, Titiaan E., Heijn, Laurens G., Jordan, Jens, van Gerven, Joop M. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885803
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1244279
_version_ 1785125617212063744
author Post, Titiaan E.
Heijn, Laurens G.
Jordan, Jens
van Gerven, Joop M. A.
author_facet Post, Titiaan E.
Heijn, Laurens G.
Jordan, Jens
van Gerven, Joop M. A.
author_sort Post, Titiaan E.
collection PubMed
description Acute exposure to hypoxia can lead to cognitive impairment. Therefore, hypoxia may become a safety concern for occupational or recreational settings at altitude. Cognitive tests are used as a tool to assess the degree to which hypoxia affects cognitive performance. However, so many different cognitive tests are used that comparing studies is challenging. This structured literature evaluation provides an overview of the different cognitive tests used to assess the effects of acute hypoxia on cognitive performance in healthy volunteers. Less frequently used similar cognitive tests were clustered and classified into domains. Subsequently, the different cognitive test clusters were compared for sensitivity to different levels of oxygen saturation. A total of 38 articles complied with the selection criteria, covering 86 different cognitive tests. The tests and clusters showed that the most consistent effects of acute hypoxia were found with the Stroop test (where 42% of studies demonstrated significant abnormalities). The most sensitive clusters were auditory/verbal memory: delayed recognition (83%); evoked potentials (60%); visual/spatial delayed recognition (50%); and sustained attention (47%). Attention tasks were not particularly sensitive to acute hypoxia (impairments in 0%–47% of studies). A significant hypoxia level-response relationship was found for the Stroop test (p = 0.001), as well as three clusters in the executive domain: inhibition (p = 0.034), reasoning/association (p = 0.019), and working memory (p = 0.024). This relationship shows a higher test sensitivity at more severe levels of hypoxia, predominantly below 80% saturation. No significant influence of barometric pressure could be identified in the limited number of studies where this was varied. This review suggests that complex and executive functions are particularly sensitive to hypoxia. Moreover, this literature evaluation provides the first step towards standardization of cognitive testing, which is crucial for a better understanding of the effects of acute hypoxia on cognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10598721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105987212023-10-26 Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review Post, Titiaan E. Heijn, Laurens G. Jordan, Jens van Gerven, Joop M. A. Front Physiol Physiology Acute exposure to hypoxia can lead to cognitive impairment. Therefore, hypoxia may become a safety concern for occupational or recreational settings at altitude. Cognitive tests are used as a tool to assess the degree to which hypoxia affects cognitive performance. However, so many different cognitive tests are used that comparing studies is challenging. This structured literature evaluation provides an overview of the different cognitive tests used to assess the effects of acute hypoxia on cognitive performance in healthy volunteers. Less frequently used similar cognitive tests were clustered and classified into domains. Subsequently, the different cognitive test clusters were compared for sensitivity to different levels of oxygen saturation. A total of 38 articles complied with the selection criteria, covering 86 different cognitive tests. The tests and clusters showed that the most consistent effects of acute hypoxia were found with the Stroop test (where 42% of studies demonstrated significant abnormalities). The most sensitive clusters were auditory/verbal memory: delayed recognition (83%); evoked potentials (60%); visual/spatial delayed recognition (50%); and sustained attention (47%). Attention tasks were not particularly sensitive to acute hypoxia (impairments in 0%–47% of studies). A significant hypoxia level-response relationship was found for the Stroop test (p = 0.001), as well as three clusters in the executive domain: inhibition (p = 0.034), reasoning/association (p = 0.019), and working memory (p = 0.024). This relationship shows a higher test sensitivity at more severe levels of hypoxia, predominantly below 80% saturation. No significant influence of barometric pressure could be identified in the limited number of studies where this was varied. This review suggests that complex and executive functions are particularly sensitive to hypoxia. Moreover, this literature evaluation provides the first step towards standardization of cognitive testing, which is crucial for a better understanding of the effects of acute hypoxia on cognition. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10598721/ /pubmed/37885803 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1244279 Text en Copyright © 2023 Post, Heijn, Jordan and van Gerven. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Post, Titiaan E.
Heijn, Laurens G.
Jordan, Jens
van Gerven, Joop M. A.
Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
title Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
title_full Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
title_short Sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
title_sort sensitivity of cognitive function tests to acute hypoxia in healthy subjects: a systematic literature review
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885803
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2023.1244279
work_keys_str_mv AT posttitiaane sensitivityofcognitivefunctionteststoacutehypoxiainhealthysubjectsasystematicliteraturereview
AT heijnlaurensg sensitivityofcognitivefunctionteststoacutehypoxiainhealthysubjectsasystematicliteraturereview
AT jordanjens sensitivityofcognitivefunctionteststoacutehypoxiainhealthysubjectsasystematicliteraturereview
AT vangervenjoopma sensitivityofcognitivefunctionteststoacutehypoxiainhealthysubjectsasystematicliteraturereview