Cargando…

The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND: The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavakoli, Amin, Panchal, Viraj R., Mazza, Genevieve R., Mandelbaum, Rachel S., Ouzounian, Joseph G., Matsuo, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100272
_version_ 1785125621032026112
author Tavakoli, Amin
Panchal, Viraj R.
Mazza, Genevieve R.
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Ouzounian, Joseph G.
Matsuo, Koji
author_facet Tavakoli, Amin
Panchal, Viraj R.
Mazza, Genevieve R.
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Ouzounian, Joseph G.
Matsuo, Koji
author_sort Tavakoli, Amin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 7,385,341 vaginal deliveries from January 2017 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was obesity status. The main outcomes were third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis examining the exposure-outcome association included (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting with log-Poisson regression generalized linear model to account for prepregnant and pregnant confounders for the exposure and (2) multinomial regression model to account for delivery factors in the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort. The secondary outcomes included (1) the temporal trends of fourth-degree laceration and its associated factors at cohort level and (2) risk factor patterns for fourth-degree laceration by constructing a classification tree model. RESULTS: In the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort, patients with obesity were less likely to have fourth-degree lacerations and third-degree lacerations than patients without obesity (fourth-degree laceration: 2.3 vs 3.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.69; third-degree laceration: 15.6 vs 20.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.82). In contrast, in patients with obesity vs those without obesity, forceps delivery (54.7 vs 3.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 17.73; 95% confidence interval, 16.17–19.44), vacuum-assisted delivery (19.8 vs 2.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.85–5.53), episiotomy (19.2 vs 2.8 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.71–4.20), and shoulder dystocia (17.8 vs 3.4 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.29–2.94) were associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of fourth-degree perineal laceration. Among the group with obesity, patients who had forceps delivery and shoulder dystocia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (105.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). Among the group without obesity, patients who had forceps delivery, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (294.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). The incidence of fourth-degree perineal laceration decreased by 11.9% over time (P trend=.004); moreover, forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, and episiotomy decreased by 3.8%, 7.6%, and 29.5%, respectively (all, P trend<.05). CONCLUSION: This national-level analysis suggests that patients with obesity are less likely to have obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, this analysis confirms other known risk factors for fourth-degree laceration, such as forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, episiotomy, and shoulder dystocia. However, we noted a decreasing trend in fourth-degree lacerations, which may be due to evolving obstetrical practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10598737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105987372023-10-26 The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery Tavakoli, Amin Panchal, Viraj R. Mazza, Genevieve R. Mandelbaum, Rachel S. Ouzounian, Joseph G. Matsuo, Koji AJOG Glob Rep Original Research BACKGROUND: The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 7,385,341 vaginal deliveries from January 2017 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was obesity status. The main outcomes were third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis examining the exposure-outcome association included (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting with log-Poisson regression generalized linear model to account for prepregnant and pregnant confounders for the exposure and (2) multinomial regression model to account for delivery factors in the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort. The secondary outcomes included (1) the temporal trends of fourth-degree laceration and its associated factors at cohort level and (2) risk factor patterns for fourth-degree laceration by constructing a classification tree model. RESULTS: In the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort, patients with obesity were less likely to have fourth-degree lacerations and third-degree lacerations than patients without obesity (fourth-degree laceration: 2.3 vs 3.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.69; third-degree laceration: 15.6 vs 20.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–0.82). In contrast, in patients with obesity vs those without obesity, forceps delivery (54.7 vs 3.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 17.73; 95% confidence interval, 16.17–19.44), vacuum-assisted delivery (19.8 vs 2.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.85–5.53), episiotomy (19.2 vs 2.8 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.71–4.20), and shoulder dystocia (17.8 vs 3.4 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.29–2.94) were associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of fourth-degree perineal laceration. Among the group with obesity, patients who had forceps delivery and shoulder dystocia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (105.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). Among the group without obesity, patients who had forceps delivery, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (294.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). The incidence of fourth-degree perineal laceration decreased by 11.9% over time (P trend=.004); moreover, forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, and episiotomy decreased by 3.8%, 7.6%, and 29.5%, respectively (all, P trend<.05). CONCLUSION: This national-level analysis suggests that patients with obesity are less likely to have obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, this analysis confirms other known risk factors for fourth-degree laceration, such as forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, episiotomy, and shoulder dystocia. However, we noted a decreasing trend in fourth-degree lacerations, which may be due to evolving obstetrical practices. Elsevier 2023-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10598737/ /pubmed/37885968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100272 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tavakoli, Amin
Panchal, Viraj R.
Mazza, Genevieve R.
Mandelbaum, Rachel S.
Ouzounian, Joseph G.
Matsuo, Koji
The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
title The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
title_full The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
title_fullStr The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
title_full_unstemmed The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
title_short The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
title_sort association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xagr.2023.100272
work_keys_str_mv AT tavakoliamin theassociationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT panchalvirajr theassociationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT mazzageneviever theassociationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT mandelbaumrachels theassociationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT ouzounianjosephg theassociationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT matsuokoji theassociationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT tavakoliamin associationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT panchalvirajr associationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT mazzageneviever associationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT mandelbaumrachels associationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT ouzounianjosephg associationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery
AT matsuokoji associationofmaternalobesityandobstetricanalsphincterinjuriesattimeofvaginaldelivery