Cargando…
Circularizing PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis
[Image: see text] The recycling of multimaterials such as payment or access cards poses significant challenges. Building on previous experimental work demonstrating the feasibility of chemically recyclable payment cards made from glycol-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET-G), we use life cycl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c04047 |
_version_ | 1785125651343212544 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Peng Ahamed, Ashiq Sun, Ruitao De Hoe, Guilhem X. Pitcher, Joe Mushing, Alan Lourenço, Fernando Shaver, Michael P. |
author_facet | Huang, Peng Ahamed, Ashiq Sun, Ruitao De Hoe, Guilhem X. Pitcher, Joe Mushing, Alan Lourenço, Fernando Shaver, Michael P. |
author_sort | Huang, Peng |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The recycling of multimaterials such as payment or access cards poses significant challenges. Building on previous experimental work demonstrating the feasibility of chemically recyclable payment cards made from glycol-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET-G), we use life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis to investigate two chemical recycling scenarios and evaluate their potential environmental and economic benefits. Recovering all components from the depolymerized products (Scenario 1) achieves substantial environmental benefits across most categories, reducing global warming by up to 67% compared to only recovering major components (Scenario 2). However, the environmental benefits in Scenario 1 incur 69% higher total annualized costs, causing its profitability to be dependent on a minimum selling price of £13.4/kg for cyclohexanedimethanol and less than a 10% discount rate. In contrast, Scenario 2 is less sensitive to discount rate variation and thus a lower risk and more economically feasible option, albeit less environmentally sustainable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10598876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105988762023-10-26 Circularizing PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis Huang, Peng Ahamed, Ashiq Sun, Ruitao De Hoe, Guilhem X. Pitcher, Joe Mushing, Alan Lourenço, Fernando Shaver, Michael P. ACS Sustain Chem Eng [Image: see text] The recycling of multimaterials such as payment or access cards poses significant challenges. Building on previous experimental work demonstrating the feasibility of chemically recyclable payment cards made from glycol-modified poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET-G), we use life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis to investigate two chemical recycling scenarios and evaluate their potential environmental and economic benefits. Recovering all components from the depolymerized products (Scenario 1) achieves substantial environmental benefits across most categories, reducing global warming by up to 67% compared to only recovering major components (Scenario 2). However, the environmental benefits in Scenario 1 incur 69% higher total annualized costs, causing its profitability to be dependent on a minimum selling price of £13.4/kg for cyclohexanedimethanol and less than a 10% discount rate. In contrast, Scenario 2 is less sensitive to discount rate variation and thus a lower risk and more economically feasible option, albeit less environmentally sustainable. American Chemical Society 2023-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10598876/ /pubmed/37886038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c04047 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Huang, Peng Ahamed, Ashiq Sun, Ruitao De Hoe, Guilhem X. Pitcher, Joe Mushing, Alan Lourenço, Fernando Shaver, Michael P. Circularizing PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis |
title | Circularizing
PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle
Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis |
title_full | Circularizing
PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle
Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis |
title_fullStr | Circularizing
PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle
Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Circularizing
PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle
Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis |
title_short | Circularizing
PET-G Multimaterials: Life Cycle
Assessment and Techno-Economic Analysis |
title_sort | circularizing
pet-g multimaterials: life cycle
assessment and techno-economic analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37886038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c04047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangpeng circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT ahamedashiq circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT sunruitao circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT dehoeguilhemx circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT pitcherjoe circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT mushingalan circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT lourencofernando circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis AT shavermichaelp circularizingpetgmultimaterialslifecycleassessmentandtechnoeconomicanalysis |