Cargando…

Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey

INTRODUCTION: Medical errors still plague healthcare. Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) and ORBB-simulation (ORBBSIM) are innovative emerging technologies which continuously capture as well as categorize intraoperative data, team information, and audio-visual files, in effort to improve objective qual...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Krystle, Gardner, Aimee, Scott, Daniel J., Johnson, Jada, Harvey, Jillian, Kazley, Abby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2
_version_ 1785125657786712064
author Campbell, Krystle
Gardner, Aimee
Scott, Daniel J.
Johnson, Jada
Harvey, Jillian
Kazley, Abby
author_facet Campbell, Krystle
Gardner, Aimee
Scott, Daniel J.
Johnson, Jada
Harvey, Jillian
Kazley, Abby
author_sort Campbell, Krystle
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Medical errors still plague healthcare. Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) and ORBB-simulation (ORBBSIM) are innovative emerging technologies which continuously capture as well as categorize intraoperative data, team information, and audio-visual files, in effort to improve objective quality measures. ORBB and ORBBSIM have an opportunity to improve patient safety, yet a paucity of implementation literature exists. Overcoming implementation barriers is critical. This study sought to obtain rich insights while identifying facilitators and barriers to adoption of ORBB and ORBBSIM in alignment with Donabedian’s model of health services and healthcare quality. Enrichment themes included translational performance improvement and real-world examples to develop sessions. METHODS: Interprofessional OR staff were invited to complete two surveys assessing staff’s perceptions using TeamSTEPPS’s validated Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables, and inductive phenomenological content analysis was used for qualitative. RESULTS: Survey 1 captured 71 responses from 334 invited (RR 21%) while survey 2 captured 47 responses from 157 (RR 29.9%). The T-TPQ score was 65.2, with Communication (70.4) the highest construct and Leadership (58.0) the lowest. Quality Improvement (QI), Patient Safety, and Objective Case Review were the most common perceived ORBB benefits. Trends suggested a reciprocal benefit of dual ORBB and ORBBSIM adoption. Trends also suggested that dual implementation can promote Psychological Safety, culture, trust, and technology comfort. The need for an implementation plan built on change management principles and a constructive culture were key findings. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported ORBB implementation themes from previous literature and deepened our understanding through the exploration of team culture. This blueprint provides a model to help organizations adopt ORBB and ORBBSIM. Outcomes can establish an empirical paradigm for future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10598903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105989032023-10-26 Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey Campbell, Krystle Gardner, Aimee Scott, Daniel J. Johnson, Jada Harvey, Jillian Kazley, Abby Adv Simul (Lond) Research INTRODUCTION: Medical errors still plague healthcare. Operating Room Black Box (ORBB) and ORBB-simulation (ORBBSIM) are innovative emerging technologies which continuously capture as well as categorize intraoperative data, team information, and audio-visual files, in effort to improve objective quality measures. ORBB and ORBBSIM have an opportunity to improve patient safety, yet a paucity of implementation literature exists. Overcoming implementation barriers is critical. This study sought to obtain rich insights while identifying facilitators and barriers to adoption of ORBB and ORBBSIM in alignment with Donabedian’s model of health services and healthcare quality. Enrichment themes included translational performance improvement and real-world examples to develop sessions. METHODS: Interprofessional OR staff were invited to complete two surveys assessing staff’s perceptions using TeamSTEPPS’s validated Teamwork Perceptions Questionnaire (T-TPQ) and open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables, and inductive phenomenological content analysis was used for qualitative. RESULTS: Survey 1 captured 71 responses from 334 invited (RR 21%) while survey 2 captured 47 responses from 157 (RR 29.9%). The T-TPQ score was 65.2, with Communication (70.4) the highest construct and Leadership (58.0) the lowest. Quality Improvement (QI), Patient Safety, and Objective Case Review were the most common perceived ORBB benefits. Trends suggested a reciprocal benefit of dual ORBB and ORBBSIM adoption. Trends also suggested that dual implementation can promote Psychological Safety, culture, trust, and technology comfort. The need for an implementation plan built on change management principles and a constructive culture were key findings. CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported ORBB implementation themes from previous literature and deepened our understanding through the exploration of team culture. This blueprint provides a model to help organizations adopt ORBB and ORBBSIM. Outcomes can establish an empirical paradigm for future studies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2. BioMed Central 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10598903/ /pubmed/37880765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Campbell, Krystle
Gardner, Aimee
Scott, Daniel J.
Johnson, Jada
Harvey, Jillian
Kazley, Abby
Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
title Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
title_full Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
title_fullStr Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
title_full_unstemmed Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
title_short Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
title_sort interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellkrystle interprofessionalstaffperspectivesontheadoptionoforblackboxtechnologyandsimulationstoimprovepatientsafetyamultimethodssurvey
AT gardneraimee interprofessionalstaffperspectivesontheadoptionoforblackboxtechnologyandsimulationstoimprovepatientsafetyamultimethodssurvey
AT scottdanielj interprofessionalstaffperspectivesontheadoptionoforblackboxtechnologyandsimulationstoimprovepatientsafetyamultimethodssurvey
AT johnsonjada interprofessionalstaffperspectivesontheadoptionoforblackboxtechnologyandsimulationstoimprovepatientsafetyamultimethodssurvey
AT harveyjillian interprofessionalstaffperspectivesontheadoptionoforblackboxtechnologyandsimulationstoimprovepatientsafetyamultimethodssurvey
AT kazleyabby interprofessionalstaffperspectivesontheadoptionoforblackboxtechnologyandsimulationstoimprovepatientsafetyamultimethodssurvey