Cargando…

Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis

Pass/fail (P/F) grading has emerged as an alternative to tiered clerkship grading. Systematically evaluating existing literature and surveying program directors (PD) perspectives on these consequential changes can guide educators in addressing inequalities in academia and students aiming to improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Andrew, Karunungan, Krystal L., Story, Jacob D., Shlobin, Nathan A., Woo, Jiyun, Ha, Edward L., Hauer, Karen E., Braddock, Clarence H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8
_version_ 1785125667870867456
author Wang, Andrew
Karunungan, Krystal L.
Story, Jacob D.
Shlobin, Nathan A.
Woo, Jiyun
Ha, Edward L.
Hauer, Karen E.
Braddock, Clarence H.
author_facet Wang, Andrew
Karunungan, Krystal L.
Story, Jacob D.
Shlobin, Nathan A.
Woo, Jiyun
Ha, Edward L.
Hauer, Karen E.
Braddock, Clarence H.
author_sort Wang, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Pass/fail (P/F) grading has emerged as an alternative to tiered clerkship grading. Systematically evaluating existing literature and surveying program directors (PD) perspectives on these consequential changes can guide educators in addressing inequalities in academia and students aiming to improve their residency applications. In our survey, a total of 1578 unique PD responses (63.1%) were obtained across 29 medical specialties. With the changes to United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE), responses showed increased importance of core clerkships with the implementation of Step 2CK cutoffs. PDs believed core clerkship performance was a reliable representation of an applicant’s preparedness for residency, particularly in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s (ACGME)Medical Knowledge and Patient Care and Procedural Skills. PDs disagreed with P/F core clerkships because it more difficult to objectively compare applicants. No statistically significant differences in responses were found in PD preferential selection when comparing applicants from tiered and P/F core clerkship grading systems. If core clerkships adopted P/F scoring, PDs would further increase emphasis on narrative assessment, sub-internship evaluation, reference letters, academic awards, professional development and medical school prestige. In the meta-analysis, of 6 studies from 2,118 participants, adjusted scaled scores with mean difference from an equal variance model from PDs showed residents from tiered clerkship grading systems overall performance, learning ability, work habits, personal evaluations, residency selection and educational evaluation were not statistically significantly different than from residents from P/F systems. Overall, our dual study suggests that while PDs do not favor P/F core clerkships, PDs do not have a selection preference and do not report a difference in performance between applicants from P/F vs. tiered grading core clerkship systems, thus providing fertile grounds for institutions to examine the feasibility of adopting P/F grading for core clerkships. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10598945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105989452023-10-26 Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis Wang, Andrew Karunungan, Krystal L. Story, Jacob D. Shlobin, Nathan A. Woo, Jiyun Ha, Edward L. Hauer, Karen E. Braddock, Clarence H. BMC Med Educ Research Pass/fail (P/F) grading has emerged as an alternative to tiered clerkship grading. Systematically evaluating existing literature and surveying program directors (PD) perspectives on these consequential changes can guide educators in addressing inequalities in academia and students aiming to improve their residency applications. In our survey, a total of 1578 unique PD responses (63.1%) were obtained across 29 medical specialties. With the changes to United States Medical Licensure Examination (USMLE), responses showed increased importance of core clerkships with the implementation of Step 2CK cutoffs. PDs believed core clerkship performance was a reliable representation of an applicant’s preparedness for residency, particularly in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s (ACGME)Medical Knowledge and Patient Care and Procedural Skills. PDs disagreed with P/F core clerkships because it more difficult to objectively compare applicants. No statistically significant differences in responses were found in PD preferential selection when comparing applicants from tiered and P/F core clerkship grading systems. If core clerkships adopted P/F scoring, PDs would further increase emphasis on narrative assessment, sub-internship evaluation, reference letters, academic awards, professional development and medical school prestige. In the meta-analysis, of 6 studies from 2,118 participants, adjusted scaled scores with mean difference from an equal variance model from PDs showed residents from tiered clerkship grading systems overall performance, learning ability, work habits, personal evaluations, residency selection and educational evaluation were not statistically significantly different than from residents from P/F systems. Overall, our dual study suggests that while PDs do not favor P/F core clerkships, PDs do not have a selection preference and do not report a difference in performance between applicants from P/F vs. tiered grading core clerkship systems, thus providing fertile grounds for institutions to examine the feasibility of adopting P/F grading for core clerkships. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8. BioMed Central 2023-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10598945/ /pubmed/37875929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Andrew
Karunungan, Krystal L.
Story, Jacob D.
Shlobin, Nathan A.
Woo, Jiyun
Ha, Edward L.
Hauer, Karen E.
Braddock, Clarence H.
Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis
title Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis
title_full Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis
title_short Reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a US residency program director survey and meta-analysis
title_sort reimagining a pass/fail clinical core clerkship: a us residency program director survey and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37875929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04770-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wangandrew reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT karunungankrystall reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT storyjacobd reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT shlobinnathana reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT woojiyun reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT haedwardl reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT hauerkarene reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis
AT braddockclarenceh reimaginingapassfailclinicalcoreclerkshipausresidencyprogramdirectorsurveyandmetaanalysis