Cargando…
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
BACKGROUND: There is a power imbalance between authors and reviewers in single-blind peer review. We explored how switching from single-blind to double-blind peer review affected 1) the willingness of experts to review, 2) their publication recommendations, and 3) the quality of review reports. METH...
Autores principales: | Parmanne, Piitu, Laajava, Joonas, Järvinen, Noora, Harju, Terttu, Marttunen, Mauri, Saloheimo, Pertti |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10598992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37876004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-023-00140-6 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Blinding peer review
por: Taffe, Michael A
Publicado: (2021) -
Are Preprints Eligible for Submission in Medical Journals following Double-Blind Peer Review?
por: Vijayakumar, Vinodhadevi, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review
por: Tomkins, Andrew, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Peer Review in Law Journals
por: Stojanovski, Jadranka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)