Cargando…

Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study

Background and objective Diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost all organ systems. The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and bone mineral density (BMD) has been a matter of controversy, and data from developing countries in this regard is highly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khandelwal, Nitish, Rajauria, Surbhi, Kanjalkar, Siddhesh Pandurang, Chavanke, Omkar Shivaji, Rai, Sanjay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885541
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45908
_version_ 1785125703667154944
author Khandelwal, Nitish
Rajauria, Surbhi
Kanjalkar, Siddhesh Pandurang
Chavanke, Omkar Shivaji
Rai, Sanjay
author_facet Khandelwal, Nitish
Rajauria, Surbhi
Kanjalkar, Siddhesh Pandurang
Chavanke, Omkar Shivaji
Rai, Sanjay
author_sort Khandelwal, Nitish
collection PubMed
description Background and objective Diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost all organ systems. The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and bone mineral density (BMD) has been a matter of controversy, and data from developing countries in this regard is highly scarce. Early detection of low BMD in diabetic patients will help prevent further bone loss and risk of fragility fracture. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of T2DM on BMD among the rural population of Haryana, India. Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional study involving 850 patients between 25 and 60 years of age, including 425 diabetic and 425 non-diabetic subjects (as controls). Calcaneus BMD was measured by using quantitative ultrasound (QUS), and the data were compared against matched parameters in both groups. Results The mean age of diabetics was 42.21 ± 10.5 years and that of non-diabetics was 42.18 ± 10.4 years. The mean BMI was 27.8 ± 4.17 kg/m(2) in diabetics and 21.6 ± 3.32 kg/m(2) in the non-diabetic control group. BMD values significantly differed between the groups: -4.3 ± 1.23 vs. -2.6 ± 0.34 in diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively (p=0.002). Conclusion A significant difference in BMD was observed between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Based on our findings, We recommend that all type 2 diabetics be screened for osteoporosis so that this silent bone loss can be detected in the early phase itself and appropriate preventive measures can be promptly initiated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10599097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105990972023-10-26 Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study Khandelwal, Nitish Rajauria, Surbhi Kanjalkar, Siddhesh Pandurang Chavanke, Omkar Shivaji Rai, Sanjay Cureus Family/General Practice Background and objective Diabetes is one of the most prevalent diseases globally, affecting almost all organ systems. The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and bone mineral density (BMD) has been a matter of controversy, and data from developing countries in this regard is highly scarce. Early detection of low BMD in diabetic patients will help prevent further bone loss and risk of fragility fracture. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of T2DM on BMD among the rural population of Haryana, India. Materials and methods This was a cross-sectional study involving 850 patients between 25 and 60 years of age, including 425 diabetic and 425 non-diabetic subjects (as controls). Calcaneus BMD was measured by using quantitative ultrasound (QUS), and the data were compared against matched parameters in both groups. Results The mean age of diabetics was 42.21 ± 10.5 years and that of non-diabetics was 42.18 ± 10.4 years. The mean BMI was 27.8 ± 4.17 kg/m(2) in diabetics and 21.6 ± 3.32 kg/m(2) in the non-diabetic control group. BMD values significantly differed between the groups: -4.3 ± 1.23 vs. -2.6 ± 0.34 in diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively (p=0.002). Conclusion A significant difference in BMD was observed between the diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Based on our findings, We recommend that all type 2 diabetics be screened for osteoporosis so that this silent bone loss can be detected in the early phase itself and appropriate preventive measures can be promptly initiated. Cureus 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10599097/ /pubmed/37885541 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45908 Text en Copyright © 2023, Khandelwal et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Family/General Practice
Khandelwal, Nitish
Rajauria, Surbhi
Kanjalkar, Siddhesh Pandurang
Chavanke, Omkar Shivaji
Rai, Sanjay
Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study
title Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Bone Mineral Density Evaluation Among Type 2 Diabetic Patients in Rural Haryana, India: An Analytical Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort bone mineral density evaluation among type 2 diabetic patients in rural haryana, india: an analytical cross-sectional study
topic Family/General Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885541
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45908
work_keys_str_mv AT khandelwalnitish bonemineraldensityevaluationamongtype2diabeticpatientsinruralharyanaindiaananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy
AT rajauriasurbhi bonemineraldensityevaluationamongtype2diabeticpatientsinruralharyanaindiaananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy
AT kanjalkarsiddheshpandurang bonemineraldensityevaluationamongtype2diabeticpatientsinruralharyanaindiaananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy
AT chavankeomkarshivaji bonemineraldensityevaluationamongtype2diabeticpatientsinruralharyanaindiaananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy
AT raisanjay bonemineraldensityevaluationamongtype2diabeticpatientsinruralharyanaindiaananalyticalcrosssectionalstudy