Cargando…

An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh

Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and evaluate the impact and flexural strength of conventional denture base resin reinforced with glass fiber mesh and polyethylene fiber mesh with Leucitone 199 denture base resin (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, USA). Leucitone is an expensive d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vijaysinh Mori, Hileri, Jadhav, Rajashree, Sabane, Ajay, Patil, Abhijit, Gachake, Arti, Gurunath Kalsekar, Bhagyashree
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885506
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45935
_version_ 1785125769122414592
author Vijaysinh Mori, Hileri
Jadhav, Rajashree
Sabane, Ajay
Patil, Abhijit
Gachake, Arti
Gurunath Kalsekar, Bhagyashree
author_facet Vijaysinh Mori, Hileri
Jadhav, Rajashree
Sabane, Ajay
Patil, Abhijit
Gachake, Arti
Gurunath Kalsekar, Bhagyashree
author_sort Vijaysinh Mori, Hileri
collection PubMed
description Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and evaluate the impact and flexural strength of conventional denture base resin reinforced with glass fiber mesh and polyethylene fiber mesh with Leucitone 199 denture base resin (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, USA). Leucitone is an expensive denture base material. To come up with a cheaper solution for reinforced denture base resin with superior impact and flexural strength was the goal of this study Material and methods The specimens (maxillary denture bases) were fabricated using a standard polyvinylsiloxane mold with conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate resin (ISO 1567:1999). The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 10). Group I specimens, or the control group, were pre-reinforced Leucitone 199. Group II and Group III specimens were reinforced with 3% by weight of glass fibers and polyethylene fibers in weave form, respectively. All the specimens were immersed in water for 1 week before testing. The impact strength was measured with a falling weight impact testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. The flexural strength was measured with the three-point bending test in a universal testing machine. Results The highest impact strength values were exhibited by the Leucitone 199 group, followed by the polyethylene fiber mesh group, followed by the glass fibers mesh group. The highest flexural strength was seen in the Leucitone 199 group, followed by the glass fiber mesh group. The least flexural strength was seen in the polyethylene fiber mesh-reinforced group.  Conclusion Reinforcement of maxillary complete dentures showed a significant increase in impact strength and flexural strength, but not in comparison to pre-reinforced Leucitone 199 dentures. By using pre-impregnated glass and polyethylene fibers in woven form (prepregs), the impact strength of the denture bases can be increased effectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10599458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105994582023-10-26 An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh Vijaysinh Mori, Hileri Jadhav, Rajashree Sabane, Ajay Patil, Abhijit Gachake, Arti Gurunath Kalsekar, Bhagyashree Cureus Dentistry Purpose The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare and evaluate the impact and flexural strength of conventional denture base resin reinforced with glass fiber mesh and polyethylene fiber mesh with Leucitone 199 denture base resin (Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, USA). Leucitone is an expensive denture base material. To come up with a cheaper solution for reinforced denture base resin with superior impact and flexural strength was the goal of this study Material and methods The specimens (maxillary denture bases) were fabricated using a standard polyvinylsiloxane mold with conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate resin (ISO 1567:1999). The specimens were divided into three groups (n = 10). Group I specimens, or the control group, were pre-reinforced Leucitone 199. Group II and Group III specimens were reinforced with 3% by weight of glass fibers and polyethylene fibers in weave form, respectively. All the specimens were immersed in water for 1 week before testing. The impact strength was measured with a falling weight impact testing machine. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test were used for statistical analysis. The flexural strength was measured with the three-point bending test in a universal testing machine. Results The highest impact strength values were exhibited by the Leucitone 199 group, followed by the polyethylene fiber mesh group, followed by the glass fibers mesh group. The highest flexural strength was seen in the Leucitone 199 group, followed by the glass fiber mesh group. The least flexural strength was seen in the polyethylene fiber mesh-reinforced group.  Conclusion Reinforcement of maxillary complete dentures showed a significant increase in impact strength and flexural strength, but not in comparison to pre-reinforced Leucitone 199 dentures. By using pre-impregnated glass and polyethylene fibers in woven form (prepregs), the impact strength of the denture bases can be increased effectively. Cureus 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10599458/ /pubmed/37885506 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45935 Text en Copyright © 2023, Vijaysinh Mori et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Dentistry
Vijaysinh Mori, Hileri
Jadhav, Rajashree
Sabane, Ajay
Patil, Abhijit
Gachake, Arti
Gurunath Kalsekar, Bhagyashree
An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh
title An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh
title_full An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh
title_fullStr An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh
title_full_unstemmed An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh
title_short An In Vitro Study Comparing the Impact and Flexural Strength of Leucitone 199 Denture Base Resin and Conventional Denture Base Resin Enhanced With Glass Fibre Mesh and Polyethylene Fibre Mesh
title_sort in vitro study comparing the impact and flexural strength of leucitone 199 denture base resin and conventional denture base resin enhanced with glass fibre mesh and polyethylene fibre mesh
topic Dentistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885506
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45935
work_keys_str_mv AT vijaysinhmorihileri aninvitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT jadhavrajashree aninvitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT sabaneajay aninvitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT patilabhijit aninvitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT gachakearti aninvitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT gurunathkalsekarbhagyashree aninvitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT vijaysinhmorihileri invitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT jadhavrajashree invitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT sabaneajay invitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT patilabhijit invitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT gachakearti invitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh
AT gurunathkalsekarbhagyashree invitrostudycomparingtheimpactandflexuralstrengthofleucitone199denturebaseresinandconventionaldenturebaseresinenhancedwithglassfibremeshandpolyethylenefibremesh