Cargando…
Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator
Background Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a potential solution to the barriers surgical trainees are facing. There needs to be validation for its implementation within current training. We aimed to compare VR simulation to traditional methods in acquiring surgical skills for a TFN-ADVANCED™ Prox...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885489 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45943 |
_version_ | 1785125800352153600 |
---|---|
author | Gomindes, Austin R Adeeko, Elizabeth S Khatri, Chetan Ahmed, Imran Sehdev, Simran Carlos, William John Ward, Thomas Leverington, James Debenham, Luke Metcalfe, Andrew Ward, Jayne |
author_facet | Gomindes, Austin R Adeeko, Elizabeth S Khatri, Chetan Ahmed, Imran Sehdev, Simran Carlos, William John Ward, Thomas Leverington, James Debenham, Luke Metcalfe, Andrew Ward, Jayne |
author_sort | Gomindes, Austin R |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a potential solution to the barriers surgical trainees are facing. There needs to be validation for its implementation within current training. We aimed to compare VR simulation to traditional methods in acquiring surgical skills for a TFN-ADVANCED™ Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA; DePuy Synthes, Auckland, New Zealand) femoral nailing system. Methods Thirty-one surgical trainees were randomised to two groups: traditional-training group (control group) and a VR-training group (intervention group) for insertion of a short cephalomedullary TFNA nail. Both groups then inserted the same TFNA system into saw-bone femurs. Surveys evaluated validity of the relevant activities, perception of simulation, confidence, stress and anxiety. The primary outcomes were tip-apex distance (TAD) and user anxiety/confidence levels. Secondary outcomes included number of screw- and nail-guidewire insertion attempts, the time taken to complete and user validity of the VR system. Results There was no statistical difference in TAD between the intervention and control groups (9mm vs 15mm, p=0.0734). The only TAD at risk of cut-out was in the control group (25mm). There was no statistical difference in time taken (2547.5ss vs 2395ss, p=0.668), nail guide-wire attempts (two for both groups, p=0.355) and screw guide-wire attempts (one for both groups, p=0.702). The control group versus intervention had higher anxiety levels (50% vs 33%) and had lower confidence (61% vs 84%). Interpretation There was no objective difference in performance on a saw-bone model between groups. However, this VR simulator resulted in more confidence and lower anxiety levels whilst performing a simulated TFNA. Whilst further studies with larger sample sizes and exploration of transfer validity to the operating theatre are required, this study does indicate potential benefits of VR within surgical training. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10599600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105996002023-10-26 Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator Gomindes, Austin R Adeeko, Elizabeth S Khatri, Chetan Ahmed, Imran Sehdev, Simran Carlos, William John Ward, Thomas Leverington, James Debenham, Luke Metcalfe, Andrew Ward, Jayne Cureus Other Background Virtual reality (VR) simulation is a potential solution to the barriers surgical trainees are facing. There needs to be validation for its implementation within current training. We aimed to compare VR simulation to traditional methods in acquiring surgical skills for a TFN-ADVANCED™ Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA; DePuy Synthes, Auckland, New Zealand) femoral nailing system. Methods Thirty-one surgical trainees were randomised to two groups: traditional-training group (control group) and a VR-training group (intervention group) for insertion of a short cephalomedullary TFNA nail. Both groups then inserted the same TFNA system into saw-bone femurs. Surveys evaluated validity of the relevant activities, perception of simulation, confidence, stress and anxiety. The primary outcomes were tip-apex distance (TAD) and user anxiety/confidence levels. Secondary outcomes included number of screw- and nail-guidewire insertion attempts, the time taken to complete and user validity of the VR system. Results There was no statistical difference in TAD between the intervention and control groups (9mm vs 15mm, p=0.0734). The only TAD at risk of cut-out was in the control group (25mm). There was no statistical difference in time taken (2547.5ss vs 2395ss, p=0.668), nail guide-wire attempts (two for both groups, p=0.355) and screw guide-wire attempts (one for both groups, p=0.702). The control group versus intervention had higher anxiety levels (50% vs 33%) and had lower confidence (61% vs 84%). Interpretation There was no objective difference in performance on a saw-bone model between groups. However, this VR simulator resulted in more confidence and lower anxiety levels whilst performing a simulated TFNA. Whilst further studies with larger sample sizes and exploration of transfer validity to the operating theatre are required, this study does indicate potential benefits of VR within surgical training. Cureus 2023-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10599600/ /pubmed/37885489 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45943 Text en Copyright © 2023, Gomindes et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Other Gomindes, Austin R Adeeko, Elizabeth S Khatri, Chetan Ahmed, Imran Sehdev, Simran Carlos, William John Ward, Thomas Leverington, James Debenham, Luke Metcalfe, Andrew Ward, Jayne Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator |
title | Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator |
title_full | Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator |
title_fullStr | Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator |
title_short | Use of Virtual Reality in the Education of Orthopaedic Procedures: A Randomised Control Study in Early Validation of a Novel Virtual Reality Simulator |
title_sort | use of virtual reality in the education of orthopaedic procedures: a randomised control study in early validation of a novel virtual reality simulator |
topic | Other |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885489 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.45943 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomindesaustinr useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT adeekoelizabeths useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT khatrichetan useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT ahmedimran useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT sehdevsimran useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT carloswilliamjohn useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT wardthomas useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT leveringtonjames useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT debenhamluke useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT metcalfeandrew useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator AT wardjayne useofvirtualrealityintheeducationoforthopaedicproceduresarandomisedcontrolstudyinearlyvalidationofanovelvirtualrealitysimulator |