Cargando…
Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock
AIMS: Invasive haemodynamic assessment with a pulmonary artery catheter is often used to guide the management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and may provide important prognostic information. We aimed to assess prognostic associations and relationships to end-organ dysfunction of presenting...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuad095 |
_version_ | 1785125809005002752 |
---|---|
author | Berg, David D Kaur, Gurleen Bohula, Erin A Baird-Zars, Vivian M Alviar, Carlos L Barnett, Christopher F Barsness, Gregory W Burke, James A Chaudhry, Sunit-Preet Chonde, Meshe Cooper, Howard A Daniels, Lori B Dodson, Mark W Gerber, Daniel A Ghafghazi, Shahab Gidwani, Umesh K Goldfarb, Michael J Guo, Jianping Hillerson, Dustin Kenigsberg, Benjamin B Kochar, Ajar Kontos, Michael C Kwon, Younghoon Lopes, Mathew S Loriaux, Daniel B Miller, P Elliott O’Brien, Connor G Papolos, Alexander I Patel, Siddharth M Pisani, Barbara A Potter, Brian J Prasad, Rajnish Rowsell, Robert O Shah, Kevin S Sinha, Shashank S Smith, Timothy D Solomon, Michael A Teuteberg, Jeffrey J Thompson, Andrea D Zakaria, Sammy Katz, Jason N van Diepen, Sean Morrow, David A |
author_facet | Berg, David D Kaur, Gurleen Bohula, Erin A Baird-Zars, Vivian M Alviar, Carlos L Barnett, Christopher F Barsness, Gregory W Burke, James A Chaudhry, Sunit-Preet Chonde, Meshe Cooper, Howard A Daniels, Lori B Dodson, Mark W Gerber, Daniel A Ghafghazi, Shahab Gidwani, Umesh K Goldfarb, Michael J Guo, Jianping Hillerson, Dustin Kenigsberg, Benjamin B Kochar, Ajar Kontos, Michael C Kwon, Younghoon Lopes, Mathew S Loriaux, Daniel B Miller, P Elliott O’Brien, Connor G Papolos, Alexander I Patel, Siddharth M Pisani, Barbara A Potter, Brian J Prasad, Rajnish Rowsell, Robert O Shah, Kevin S Sinha, Shashank S Smith, Timothy D Solomon, Michael A Teuteberg, Jeffrey J Thompson, Andrea D Zakaria, Sammy Katz, Jason N van Diepen, Sean Morrow, David A |
author_sort | Berg, David D |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Invasive haemodynamic assessment with a pulmonary artery catheter is often used to guide the management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and may provide important prognostic information. We aimed to assess prognostic associations and relationships to end-organ dysfunction of presenting haemodynamic parameters in CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is an investigator-initiated multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) in North America coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. Patients with CS (2018–2022) who underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment within 24 h of CICU admission were included. Associations of haemodynamic parameters with in-hospital mortality were assessed using logistic regression, and associations with presenting serum lactate were assessed using least squares means regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients on temporary mechanical circulatory support and adjusted for vasoactive-inotropic score. Among the 3603 admissions with CS, 1473 had haemodynamic data collected within 24 h of CICU admission. The median cardiac index was 1.9 (25th–75th percentile, 1.6–2.4) L/min/m(2) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 74 (66–86) mmHg. Parameters associated with mortality included low MAP, low systolic blood pressure, low systemic vascular resistance, elevated right atrial pressure (RAP), elevated RAP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio, and low pulmonary artery pulsatility index. These associations were generally consistent when controlling for the intensity of background pharmacologic and mechanical haemodynamic support. These parameters were also associated with higher presenting serum lactate. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary CS population, presenting haemodynamic parameters reflecting decreased systemic arterial tone and right ventricular dysfunction are associated with adverse outcomes and systemic hypoperfusion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10599641 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105996412023-10-26 Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock Berg, David D Kaur, Gurleen Bohula, Erin A Baird-Zars, Vivian M Alviar, Carlos L Barnett, Christopher F Barsness, Gregory W Burke, James A Chaudhry, Sunit-Preet Chonde, Meshe Cooper, Howard A Daniels, Lori B Dodson, Mark W Gerber, Daniel A Ghafghazi, Shahab Gidwani, Umesh K Goldfarb, Michael J Guo, Jianping Hillerson, Dustin Kenigsberg, Benjamin B Kochar, Ajar Kontos, Michael C Kwon, Younghoon Lopes, Mathew S Loriaux, Daniel B Miller, P Elliott O’Brien, Connor G Papolos, Alexander I Patel, Siddharth M Pisani, Barbara A Potter, Brian J Prasad, Rajnish Rowsell, Robert O Shah, Kevin S Sinha, Shashank S Smith, Timothy D Solomon, Michael A Teuteberg, Jeffrey J Thompson, Andrea D Zakaria, Sammy Katz, Jason N van Diepen, Sean Morrow, David A Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care Original Scientific Paper AIMS: Invasive haemodynamic assessment with a pulmonary artery catheter is often used to guide the management of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) and may provide important prognostic information. We aimed to assess prognostic associations and relationships to end-organ dysfunction of presenting haemodynamic parameters in CS. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network is an investigator-initiated multicenter registry of cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) in North America coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. Patients with CS (2018–2022) who underwent invasive haemodynamic assessment within 24 h of CICU admission were included. Associations of haemodynamic parameters with in-hospital mortality were assessed using logistic regression, and associations with presenting serum lactate were assessed using least squares means regression. Sensitivity analyses were performed excluding patients on temporary mechanical circulatory support and adjusted for vasoactive-inotropic score. Among the 3603 admissions with CS, 1473 had haemodynamic data collected within 24 h of CICU admission. The median cardiac index was 1.9 (25th–75th percentile, 1.6–2.4) L/min/m(2) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 74 (66–86) mmHg. Parameters associated with mortality included low MAP, low systolic blood pressure, low systemic vascular resistance, elevated right atrial pressure (RAP), elevated RAP/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio, and low pulmonary artery pulsatility index. These associations were generally consistent when controlling for the intensity of background pharmacologic and mechanical haemodynamic support. These parameters were also associated with higher presenting serum lactate. CONCLUSION: In a contemporary CS population, presenting haemodynamic parameters reflecting decreased systemic arterial tone and right ventricular dysfunction are associated with adverse outcomes and systemic hypoperfusion. Oxford University Press 2023-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10599641/ /pubmed/37640029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuad095 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Scientific Paper Berg, David D Kaur, Gurleen Bohula, Erin A Baird-Zars, Vivian M Alviar, Carlos L Barnett, Christopher F Barsness, Gregory W Burke, James A Chaudhry, Sunit-Preet Chonde, Meshe Cooper, Howard A Daniels, Lori B Dodson, Mark W Gerber, Daniel A Ghafghazi, Shahab Gidwani, Umesh K Goldfarb, Michael J Guo, Jianping Hillerson, Dustin Kenigsberg, Benjamin B Kochar, Ajar Kontos, Michael C Kwon, Younghoon Lopes, Mathew S Loriaux, Daniel B Miller, P Elliott O’Brien, Connor G Papolos, Alexander I Patel, Siddharth M Pisani, Barbara A Potter, Brian J Prasad, Rajnish Rowsell, Robert O Shah, Kevin S Sinha, Shashank S Smith, Timothy D Solomon, Michael A Teuteberg, Jeffrey J Thompson, Andrea D Zakaria, Sammy Katz, Jason N van Diepen, Sean Morrow, David A Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
title | Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
title_full | Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
title_fullStr | Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
title_short | Prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
title_sort | prognostic significance of haemodynamic parameters in patients with cardiogenic shock |
topic | Original Scientific Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599641/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37640029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuad095 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bergdavidd prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT kaurgurleen prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT bohulaerina prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT bairdzarsvivianm prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT alviarcarlosl prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT barnettchristopherf prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT barsnessgregoryw prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT burkejamesa prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT chaudhrysunitpreet prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT chondemeshe prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT cooperhowarda prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT danielslorib prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT dodsonmarkw prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT gerberdaniela prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT ghafghazishahab prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT gidwaniumeshk prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT goldfarbmichaelj prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT guojianping prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT hillersondustin prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT kenigsbergbenjaminb prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT kocharajar prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT kontosmichaelc prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT kwonyounghoon prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT lopesmathews prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT loriauxdanielb prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT millerpelliott prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT obrienconnorg prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT papolosalexanderi prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT patelsiddharthm prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT pisanibarbaraa prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT potterbrianj prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT prasadrajnish prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT rowsellroberto prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT shahkevins prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT sinhashashanks prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT smithtimothyd prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT solomonmichaela prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT teutebergjeffreyj prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT thompsonandread prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT zakariasammy prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT katzjasonn prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT vandiepensean prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock AT morrowdavida prognosticsignificanceofhaemodynamicparametersinpatientswithcardiogenicshock |