Cargando…
The best practice for microbiome analysis using R
With the gradual maturity of sequencing technology, many microbiome studies have published, driving the emergence and advance of related analysis tools. R language is the widely used platform for microbiome data analysis for powerful functions. However, tens of thousands of R packages and numerous s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/procel/pwad024 |
_version_ | 1785125809251418112 |
---|---|
author | Wen, Tao Niu, Guoqing Chen, Tong Shen, Qirong Yuan, Jun Liu, Yong-Xin |
author_facet | Wen, Tao Niu, Guoqing Chen, Tong Shen, Qirong Yuan, Jun Liu, Yong-Xin |
author_sort | Wen, Tao |
collection | PubMed |
description | With the gradual maturity of sequencing technology, many microbiome studies have published, driving the emergence and advance of related analysis tools. R language is the widely used platform for microbiome data analysis for powerful functions. However, tens of thousands of R packages and numerous similar analysis tools have brought major challenges for many researchers to explore microbiome data. How to choose suitable, efficient, convenient, and easy-to-learn tools from the numerous R packages has become a problem for many microbiome researchers. We have organized 324 common R packages for microbiome analysis and classified them according to application categories (diversity, difference, biomarker, correlation and network, functional prediction, and others), which could help researchers quickly find relevant R packages for microbiome analysis. Furthermore, we systematically sorted the integrated R packages (phyloseq, microbiome, MicrobiomeAnalystR, Animalcules, microeco, and amplicon) for microbiome analysis, and summarized the advantages and limitations, which will help researchers choose the appropriate tools. Finally, we thoroughly reviewed the R packages for microbiome analysis, summarized most of the common analysis content in the microbiome, and formed the most suitable pipeline for microbiome analysis. This paper is accompanied by hundreds of examples with 10,000 lines codes in GitHub, which can help beginners to learn, also help analysts compare and test different tools. This paper systematically sorts the application of R in microbiome, providing an important theoretical basis and practical reference for the development of better microbiome tools in the future. All the code is available at GitHub github.com/taowenmicro/EasyMicrobiomeR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10599642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-105996422023-10-26 The best practice for microbiome analysis using R Wen, Tao Niu, Guoqing Chen, Tong Shen, Qirong Yuan, Jun Liu, Yong-Xin Protein Cell Reviews With the gradual maturity of sequencing technology, many microbiome studies have published, driving the emergence and advance of related analysis tools. R language is the widely used platform for microbiome data analysis for powerful functions. However, tens of thousands of R packages and numerous similar analysis tools have brought major challenges for many researchers to explore microbiome data. How to choose suitable, efficient, convenient, and easy-to-learn tools from the numerous R packages has become a problem for many microbiome researchers. We have organized 324 common R packages for microbiome analysis and classified them according to application categories (diversity, difference, biomarker, correlation and network, functional prediction, and others), which could help researchers quickly find relevant R packages for microbiome analysis. Furthermore, we systematically sorted the integrated R packages (phyloseq, microbiome, MicrobiomeAnalystR, Animalcules, microeco, and amplicon) for microbiome analysis, and summarized the advantages and limitations, which will help researchers choose the appropriate tools. Finally, we thoroughly reviewed the R packages for microbiome analysis, summarized most of the common analysis content in the microbiome, and formed the most suitable pipeline for microbiome analysis. This paper is accompanied by hundreds of examples with 10,000 lines codes in GitHub, which can help beginners to learn, also help analysts compare and test different tools. This paper systematically sorts the application of R in microbiome, providing an important theoretical basis and practical reference for the development of better microbiome tools in the future. All the code is available at GitHub github.com/taowenmicro/EasyMicrobiomeR. Oxford University Press 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10599642/ /pubmed/37128855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/procel/pwad024 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Higher Education Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Wen, Tao Niu, Guoqing Chen, Tong Shen, Qirong Yuan, Jun Liu, Yong-Xin The best practice for microbiome analysis using R |
title | The best practice for microbiome analysis using R |
title_full | The best practice for microbiome analysis using R |
title_fullStr | The best practice for microbiome analysis using R |
title_full_unstemmed | The best practice for microbiome analysis using R |
title_short | The best practice for microbiome analysis using R |
title_sort | best practice for microbiome analysis using r |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128855 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/procel/pwad024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wentao thebestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT niuguoqing thebestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT chentong thebestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT shenqirong thebestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT yuanjun thebestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT liuyongxin thebestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT wentao bestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT niuguoqing bestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT chentong bestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT shenqirong bestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT yuanjun bestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr AT liuyongxin bestpracticeformicrobiomeanalysisusingr |