Cargando…

Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial

OBJECTIVE: To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies. METHODS: A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rueda Díaz, Leidy Johanna, de Souza Guedes, Erika, de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, Diná
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599694/
http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04
_version_ 1785125820131442688
author Rueda Díaz, Leidy Johanna
de Souza Guedes, Erika
de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, Diná
author_facet Rueda Díaz, Leidy Johanna
de Souza Guedes, Erika
de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, Diná
author_sort Rueda Díaz, Leidy Johanna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies. METHODS: A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical development in Colombia and Brazil. Recruitment was measured by the number of participants eligible and consented. Retention was assessed by the percentage of participants with outcomes data at two follow-ups. The intervention adherence was measured by the percentage of the caregiver who received the intervention. RESULTS: Of the family caregivers assessed, 63% were eligible, and 32.9% declined to be in the study for time restriction or no interest. In Colombia, the total retention rate of caregivers was 63.4% at the first follow-up and 48% at the second follow-up, while in Brazil was de 52.8% and 46.2%, respectively. At the end of the study, the sample comprised 28 and 70 caregivers in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for a retention rate of 47%. Of 104 family caregivers allocated to the intervention group, 42 (40.3%) received five sessions. Most reported not completing the Caregiver's Activity Diary. CONCLUSION: The recruitment of family caregivers, participant retention, and adherence to the telephone intervention was unsuccessful. Future studies should apply an assessment tool during the recruitment of family caregivers and replace the term "caregiver" with "care provider" in the material involved in the research; define a retention protocol before starting the study and involve family caregivers in the design of the interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10599694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-105996942023-10-26 Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial Rueda Díaz, Leidy Johanna de Souza Guedes, Erika de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, Diná Invest Educ Enferm Original Article OBJECTIVE: To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies. METHODS: A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical development in Colombia and Brazil. Recruitment was measured by the number of participants eligible and consented. Retention was assessed by the percentage of participants with outcomes data at two follow-ups. The intervention adherence was measured by the percentage of the caregiver who received the intervention. RESULTS: Of the family caregivers assessed, 63% were eligible, and 32.9% declined to be in the study for time restriction or no interest. In Colombia, the total retention rate of caregivers was 63.4% at the first follow-up and 48% at the second follow-up, while in Brazil was de 52.8% and 46.2%, respectively. At the end of the study, the sample comprised 28 and 70 caregivers in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for a retention rate of 47%. Of 104 family caregivers allocated to the intervention group, 42 (40.3%) received five sessions. Most reported not completing the Caregiver's Activity Diary. CONCLUSION: The recruitment of family caregivers, participant retention, and adherence to the telephone intervention was unsuccessful. Future studies should apply an assessment tool during the recruitment of family caregivers and replace the term "caregiver" with "care provider" in the material involved in the research; define a retention protocol before starting the study and involve family caregivers in the design of the interventions. Imprenta Universidad de Antioquia 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10599694/ http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Original Article
Rueda Díaz, Leidy Johanna
de Souza Guedes, Erika
de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz, Diná
Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
title Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
title_full Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
title_fullStr Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
title_full_unstemmed Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
title_short Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial
title_sort recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: lessons from a multisite trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10599694/
http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04
work_keys_str_mv AT ruedadiazleidyjohanna recruitmentretentionandadherenceoffamilycaregiverslessonsfromamultisitetrial
AT desouzaguedeserika recruitmentretentionandadherenceoffamilycaregiverslessonsfromamultisitetrial
AT dealmeidalopesmonteirodacruzdina recruitmentretentionandadherenceoffamilycaregiverslessonsfromamultisitetrial