Cargando…
A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction
The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated health complications highlight the need to develop predictive models for early diagnosis and intervention. While many artificial intelligence (AI) models for T2DM risk prediction have emerged, a comprehensive review of t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00933-5 |
_version_ | 1785125923188637696 |
---|---|
author | Mohsen, Farida Al-Absi, Hamada R. H. Yousri, Noha A. El Hajj, Nady Shah, Zubair |
author_facet | Mohsen, Farida Al-Absi, Hamada R. H. Yousri, Noha A. El Hajj, Nady Shah, Zubair |
author_sort | Mohsen, Farida |
collection | PubMed |
description | The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated health complications highlight the need to develop predictive models for early diagnosis and intervention. While many artificial intelligence (AI) models for T2DM risk prediction have emerged, a comprehensive review of their advancements and challenges is currently lacking. This scoping review maps out the existing literature on AI-based models for T2DM prediction, adhering to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search of longitudinal studies was conducted across four databases, including PubMed, Scopus, IEEE-Xplore, and Google Scholar. Forty studies that met our inclusion criteria were reviewed. Classical machine learning (ML) models dominated these studies, with electronic health records (EHR) being the predominant data modality, followed by multi-omics, while medical imaging was the least utilized. Most studies employed unimodal AI models, with only ten adopting multimodal approaches. Both unimodal and multimodal models showed promising results, with the latter being superior. Almost all studies performed internal validation, but only five conducted external validation. Most studies utilized the area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination measures. Notably, only five studies provided insights into the calibration of their models. Half of the studies used interpretability methods to identify key risk predictors revealed by their models. Although a minority highlighted novel risk predictors, the majority reported commonly known ones. Our review provides valuable insights into the current state and limitations of AI-based models for T2DM prediction and highlights the challenges associated with their development and clinical integration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10600138 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106001382023-10-27 A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction Mohsen, Farida Al-Absi, Hamada R. H. Yousri, Noha A. El Hajj, Nady Shah, Zubair NPJ Digit Med Review Article The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its associated health complications highlight the need to develop predictive models for early diagnosis and intervention. While many artificial intelligence (AI) models for T2DM risk prediction have emerged, a comprehensive review of their advancements and challenges is currently lacking. This scoping review maps out the existing literature on AI-based models for T2DM prediction, adhering to the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A systematic search of longitudinal studies was conducted across four databases, including PubMed, Scopus, IEEE-Xplore, and Google Scholar. Forty studies that met our inclusion criteria were reviewed. Classical machine learning (ML) models dominated these studies, with electronic health records (EHR) being the predominant data modality, followed by multi-omics, while medical imaging was the least utilized. Most studies employed unimodal AI models, with only ten adopting multimodal approaches. Both unimodal and multimodal models showed promising results, with the latter being superior. Almost all studies performed internal validation, but only five conducted external validation. Most studies utilized the area under the curve (AUC) for discrimination measures. Notably, only five studies provided insights into the calibration of their models. Half of the studies used interpretability methods to identify key risk predictors revealed by their models. Although a minority highlighted novel risk predictors, the majority reported commonly known ones. Our review provides valuable insights into the current state and limitations of AI-based models for T2DM prediction and highlights the challenges associated with their development and clinical integration. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10600138/ /pubmed/37880301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00933-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Mohsen, Farida Al-Absi, Hamada R. H. Yousri, Noha A. El Hajj, Nady Shah, Zubair A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
title | A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
title_full | A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
title_short | A scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
title_sort | scoping review of artificial intelligence-based methods for diabetes risk prediction |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600138/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00933-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohsenfarida ascopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT alabsihamadarh ascopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT yousrinohaa ascopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT elhajjnady ascopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT shahzubair ascopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT mohsenfarida scopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT alabsihamadarh scopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT yousrinohaa scopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT elhajjnady scopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction AT shahzubair scopingreviewofartificialintelligencebasedmethodsfordiabetesriskprediction |