Cargando…
Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study
BACKGROUND: In Australia, prescription melatonin became a ‘Pharmacist Only Medicine’ for people over 55 with insomnia from June 2021. However, little is known about pharmacists’ views on melatonin down-scheduling and perceived impacts on practice. AIM: To explore Australian community pharmacists’ vi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37354280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01605-w |
_version_ | 1785125960093270016 |
---|---|
author | Yeung, Kingston W. C. M. Lee, Samantha K. M. Bin, Yu Sun Cheung, Janet M. Y. |
author_facet | Yeung, Kingston W. C. M. Lee, Samantha K. M. Bin, Yu Sun Cheung, Janet M. Y. |
author_sort | Yeung, Kingston W. C. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In Australia, prescription melatonin became a ‘Pharmacist Only Medicine’ for people over 55 with insomnia from June 2021. However, little is known about pharmacists’ views on melatonin down-scheduling and perceived impacts on practice. AIM: To explore Australian community pharmacists’ views on and attitudes towards the down-scheduling of melatonin. METHOD: A convenience sample of community pharmacists and pharmacy interns were recruited. Participants completed a survey capturing demographic and professional practice details, and rated their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards melatonin. This was followed by an online semi-structured interview. Interviews were guided by a schedule of questions developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and explored the perceived role of melatonin, preparation/response to down-scheduling, practice changes and patient interactions. Interviews continued until data saturation and were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: Twenty-four interviews were conducted with community pharmacists (n = 19) and intern pharmacists (n = 5), all practicing in metropolitan areas. Pharmacists/intern pharmacists welcomed the increased accessibility of melatonin for patients. However, pharmacists perceived a disconnect between the guidelines, supply protocols and pack sizes with practice, making it difficult to monitor patient use of melatonin. The miscommunication of eligibility also contributed to patient-pharmacist tension when supply was denied. Importantly, most participants indicated their interest in upskilling their knowledge in melatonin use in sleep, specifically formulation differences and dosage titration. CONCLUSION: While pharmacists welcomed the down-scheduling of melatonin, several challenges were noted, contributing to pharmacist-patient tensions in practice. Findings highlight the need to refine and unify melatonin supply protocols and amend pack sizes to reflect guideline recommendations as well as better educating the public about the risk-benefits of melatonin. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01605-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10600292 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106002922023-10-27 Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study Yeung, Kingston W. C. M. Lee, Samantha K. M. Bin, Yu Sun Cheung, Janet M. Y. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: In Australia, prescription melatonin became a ‘Pharmacist Only Medicine’ for people over 55 with insomnia from June 2021. However, little is known about pharmacists’ views on melatonin down-scheduling and perceived impacts on practice. AIM: To explore Australian community pharmacists’ views on and attitudes towards the down-scheduling of melatonin. METHOD: A convenience sample of community pharmacists and pharmacy interns were recruited. Participants completed a survey capturing demographic and professional practice details, and rated their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards melatonin. This was followed by an online semi-structured interview. Interviews were guided by a schedule of questions developed using the Theoretical Domains Framework and explored the perceived role of melatonin, preparation/response to down-scheduling, practice changes and patient interactions. Interviews continued until data saturation and were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework Approach. RESULTS: Twenty-four interviews were conducted with community pharmacists (n = 19) and intern pharmacists (n = 5), all practicing in metropolitan areas. Pharmacists/intern pharmacists welcomed the increased accessibility of melatonin for patients. However, pharmacists perceived a disconnect between the guidelines, supply protocols and pack sizes with practice, making it difficult to monitor patient use of melatonin. The miscommunication of eligibility also contributed to patient-pharmacist tension when supply was denied. Importantly, most participants indicated their interest in upskilling their knowledge in melatonin use in sleep, specifically formulation differences and dosage titration. CONCLUSION: While pharmacists welcomed the down-scheduling of melatonin, several challenges were noted, contributing to pharmacist-patient tensions in practice. Findings highlight the need to refine and unify melatonin supply protocols and amend pack sizes to reflect guideline recommendations as well as better educating the public about the risk-benefits of melatonin. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-023-01605-w. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-24 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10600292/ /pubmed/37354280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01605-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yeung, Kingston W. C. M. Lee, Samantha K. M. Bin, Yu Sun Cheung, Janet M. Y. Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study |
title | Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study |
title_full | Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study |
title_fullStr | Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study |
title_short | Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study |
title_sort | pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in australia using the theoretical domains framework: a mixed-methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600292/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37354280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-023-01605-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeungkingstonwcm pharmacistsperspectivesandattitudestowardsthe2021downschedulingofmelatonininaustraliausingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkamixedmethodsstudy AT leesamanthakm pharmacistsperspectivesandattitudestowardsthe2021downschedulingofmelatonininaustraliausingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkamixedmethodsstudy AT binyusun pharmacistsperspectivesandattitudestowardsthe2021downschedulingofmelatonininaustraliausingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkamixedmethodsstudy AT cheungjanetmy pharmacistsperspectivesandattitudestowardsthe2021downschedulingofmelatonininaustraliausingthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkamixedmethodsstudy |