Cargando…
Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
OBJECTIVES: India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign engaged frontline workers (FLWs) to encourage vaccination among vulnerable segments of society. The FLWs report encountering a variety of barriers to vaccination and are often unsuccessful despite multiple visits to the same person. This cross-sectio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177634 |
_version_ | 1785125977429377024 |
---|---|
author | Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy Mulvey, Michael S. Gowda, Kallana Singh, Meghna Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar Syam, Syama B. Shah, Prerak Kumar, Shiv Chaudhuri, Angela Narayanan, Raghunathan Perne, Abdul Latheef Pangaria, Aditya |
author_facet | Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy Mulvey, Michael S. Gowda, Kallana Singh, Meghna Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar Syam, Syama B. Shah, Prerak Kumar, Shiv Chaudhuri, Angela Narayanan, Raghunathan Perne, Abdul Latheef Pangaria, Aditya |
author_sort | Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign engaged frontline workers (FLWs) to encourage vaccination among vulnerable segments of society. The FLWs report encountering a variety of barriers to vaccination and are often unsuccessful despite multiple visits to the same person. This cross-sectional study aims to pinpoint which of these barriers drive vaccine hesitancy among these segments, to help streamline vaccine communication, including FLW training, to better safeguard the population. METHODS: Trained field enumerators contacted 893 individuals from five states across India and collected self-reported assessments of fifteen vaccination barriers (identified through discussions with FLWs), current vaccination status and future vaccination intentions, and covariates (demographics/comorbidities). Factor analysis of the fifteen barriers yielded two factors, one relating to fear of vaccine adverse effects and a second focused on peripheral concerns regarding the vaccine. The covariates significantly associated with current vaccination status were combined under a latent class regime to yield three cluster types (health access, financial strength, and demographics). The primary analysis examined the effect of the two barrier factors, the covariate clusters, and comorbidity, on current vaccination status and future vaccine intentions. RESULTS: Fear of vaccine adverse effects was the primary driver of vaccine hesitancy; peripheral concerns frequently mentioned by the FLWs had no impact. Although cluster membership and the presence of comorbidities predicted vaccine uptake, neither of them materially altered the effect of fear of vaccine adverse effects with the following exception: fear of adverse effects was not associated with vaccination status among young Muslim men. CONCLUSION: Subject to limitations, these results indicate that interventions to decrease vaccine hesitancy should focus primarily on fear associated with vaccines rather than spend resources trying to address peripheral concerns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10600374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106003742023-10-27 Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy Mulvey, Michael S. Gowda, Kallana Singh, Meghna Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar Syam, Syama B. Shah, Prerak Kumar, Shiv Chaudhuri, Angela Narayanan, Raghunathan Perne, Abdul Latheef Pangaria, Aditya Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVES: India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign engaged frontline workers (FLWs) to encourage vaccination among vulnerable segments of society. The FLWs report encountering a variety of barriers to vaccination and are often unsuccessful despite multiple visits to the same person. This cross-sectional study aims to pinpoint which of these barriers drive vaccine hesitancy among these segments, to help streamline vaccine communication, including FLW training, to better safeguard the population. METHODS: Trained field enumerators contacted 893 individuals from five states across India and collected self-reported assessments of fifteen vaccination barriers (identified through discussions with FLWs), current vaccination status and future vaccination intentions, and covariates (demographics/comorbidities). Factor analysis of the fifteen barriers yielded two factors, one relating to fear of vaccine adverse effects and a second focused on peripheral concerns regarding the vaccine. The covariates significantly associated with current vaccination status were combined under a latent class regime to yield three cluster types (health access, financial strength, and demographics). The primary analysis examined the effect of the two barrier factors, the covariate clusters, and comorbidity, on current vaccination status and future vaccine intentions. RESULTS: Fear of vaccine adverse effects was the primary driver of vaccine hesitancy; peripheral concerns frequently mentioned by the FLWs had no impact. Although cluster membership and the presence of comorbidities predicted vaccine uptake, neither of them materially altered the effect of fear of vaccine adverse effects with the following exception: fear of adverse effects was not associated with vaccination status among young Muslim men. CONCLUSION: Subject to limitations, these results indicate that interventions to decrease vaccine hesitancy should focus primarily on fear associated with vaccines rather than spend resources trying to address peripheral concerns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10600374/ /pubmed/37900017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177634 Text en Copyright © 2023 Krishnamurthy, Mulvey, Gowda, Singh, Venkatesan, Syam, Shah, Kumar, Chaudhuri, Narayanan, Perne and Pangaria. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy Mulvey, Michael S. Gowda, Kallana Singh, Meghna Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar Syam, Syama B. Shah, Prerak Kumar, Shiv Chaudhuri, Angela Narayanan, Raghunathan Perne, Abdul Latheef Pangaria, Aditya Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
title | Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
title_full | Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
title_fullStr | Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
title_full_unstemmed | Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
title_short | Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
title_sort | drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in india: a cross-sectional multi-state study |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177634 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnamurthyparthasarathy driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT mulveymichaels driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT gowdakallana driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT singhmeghna driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT venkatesannitishkumar driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT syamsyamab driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT shahprerak driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT kumarshiv driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT chaudhuriangela driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT narayananraghunathan driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT perneabdullatheef driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy AT pangariaaditya driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy |