Cargando…

Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study

OBJECTIVES: India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign engaged frontline workers (FLWs) to encourage vaccination among vulnerable segments of society. The FLWs report encountering a variety of barriers to vaccination and are often unsuccessful despite multiple visits to the same person. This cross-sectio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy, Mulvey, Michael S., Gowda, Kallana, Singh, Meghna, Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar, Syam, Syama B., Shah, Prerak, Kumar, Shiv, Chaudhuri, Angela, Narayanan, Raghunathan, Perne, Abdul Latheef, Pangaria, Aditya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177634
_version_ 1785125977429377024
author Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy
Mulvey, Michael S.
Gowda, Kallana
Singh, Meghna
Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar
Syam, Syama B.
Shah, Prerak
Kumar, Shiv
Chaudhuri, Angela
Narayanan, Raghunathan
Perne, Abdul Latheef
Pangaria, Aditya
author_facet Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy
Mulvey, Michael S.
Gowda, Kallana
Singh, Meghna
Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar
Syam, Syama B.
Shah, Prerak
Kumar, Shiv
Chaudhuri, Angela
Narayanan, Raghunathan
Perne, Abdul Latheef
Pangaria, Aditya
author_sort Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign engaged frontline workers (FLWs) to encourage vaccination among vulnerable segments of society. The FLWs report encountering a variety of barriers to vaccination and are often unsuccessful despite multiple visits to the same person. This cross-sectional study aims to pinpoint which of these barriers drive vaccine hesitancy among these segments, to help streamline vaccine communication, including FLW training, to better safeguard the population. METHODS: Trained field enumerators contacted 893 individuals from five states across India and collected self-reported assessments of fifteen vaccination barriers (identified through discussions with FLWs), current vaccination status and future vaccination intentions, and covariates (demographics/comorbidities). Factor analysis of the fifteen barriers yielded two factors, one relating to fear of vaccine adverse effects and a second focused on peripheral concerns regarding the vaccine. The covariates significantly associated with current vaccination status were combined under a latent class regime to yield three cluster types (health access, financial strength, and demographics). The primary analysis examined the effect of the two barrier factors, the covariate clusters, and comorbidity, on current vaccination status and future vaccine intentions. RESULTS: Fear of vaccine adverse effects was the primary driver of vaccine hesitancy; peripheral concerns frequently mentioned by the FLWs had no impact. Although cluster membership and the presence of comorbidities predicted vaccine uptake, neither of them materially altered the effect of fear of vaccine adverse effects with the following exception: fear of adverse effects was not associated with vaccination status among young Muslim men. CONCLUSION: Subject to limitations, these results indicate that interventions to decrease vaccine hesitancy should focus primarily on fear associated with vaccines rather than spend resources trying to address peripheral concerns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10600374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106003742023-10-27 Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy Mulvey, Michael S. Gowda, Kallana Singh, Meghna Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar Syam, Syama B. Shah, Prerak Kumar, Shiv Chaudhuri, Angela Narayanan, Raghunathan Perne, Abdul Latheef Pangaria, Aditya Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVES: India’s Covid-19 vaccination campaign engaged frontline workers (FLWs) to encourage vaccination among vulnerable segments of society. The FLWs report encountering a variety of barriers to vaccination and are often unsuccessful despite multiple visits to the same person. This cross-sectional study aims to pinpoint which of these barriers drive vaccine hesitancy among these segments, to help streamline vaccine communication, including FLW training, to better safeguard the population. METHODS: Trained field enumerators contacted 893 individuals from five states across India and collected self-reported assessments of fifteen vaccination barriers (identified through discussions with FLWs), current vaccination status and future vaccination intentions, and covariates (demographics/comorbidities). Factor analysis of the fifteen barriers yielded two factors, one relating to fear of vaccine adverse effects and a second focused on peripheral concerns regarding the vaccine. The covariates significantly associated with current vaccination status were combined under a latent class regime to yield three cluster types (health access, financial strength, and demographics). The primary analysis examined the effect of the two barrier factors, the covariate clusters, and comorbidity, on current vaccination status and future vaccine intentions. RESULTS: Fear of vaccine adverse effects was the primary driver of vaccine hesitancy; peripheral concerns frequently mentioned by the FLWs had no impact. Although cluster membership and the presence of comorbidities predicted vaccine uptake, neither of them materially altered the effect of fear of vaccine adverse effects with the following exception: fear of adverse effects was not associated with vaccination status among young Muslim men. CONCLUSION: Subject to limitations, these results indicate that interventions to decrease vaccine hesitancy should focus primarily on fear associated with vaccines rather than spend resources trying to address peripheral concerns. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10600374/ /pubmed/37900017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177634 Text en Copyright © 2023 Krishnamurthy, Mulvey, Gowda, Singh, Venkatesan, Syam, Shah, Kumar, Chaudhuri, Narayanan, Perne and Pangaria. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Krishnamurthy, Parthasarathy
Mulvey, Michael S.
Gowda, Kallana
Singh, Meghna
Venkatesan, Nitish Kumar
Syam, Syama B.
Shah, Prerak
Kumar, Shiv
Chaudhuri, Angela
Narayanan, Raghunathan
Perne, Abdul Latheef
Pangaria, Aditya
Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
title Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
title_full Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
title_fullStr Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
title_short Drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in India: a cross-sectional multi-state study
title_sort drivers of vaccine hesitancy among vulnerable populations in india: a cross-sectional multi-state study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1177634
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnamurthyparthasarathy driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT mulveymichaels driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT gowdakallana driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT singhmeghna driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT venkatesannitishkumar driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT syamsyamab driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT shahprerak driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT kumarshiv driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT chaudhuriangela driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT narayananraghunathan driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT perneabdullatheef driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy
AT pangariaaditya driversofvaccinehesitancyamongvulnerablepopulationsinindiaacrosssectionalmultistatestudy