Cargando…

Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current lite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carver, Caden A., Kalesinskas, Mikole, Ahmed, A. Razzaque
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668
_version_ 1785125996346736640
author Carver, Caden A.
Kalesinskas, Mikole
Ahmed, A. Razzaque
author_facet Carver, Caden A.
Kalesinskas, Mikole
Ahmed, A. Razzaque
author_sort Carver, Caden A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg. RESULTS: Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively. DISCUSSION: In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10600482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106004822023-10-27 Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review Carver, Caden A. Kalesinskas, Mikole Ahmed, A. Razzaque Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg. RESULTS: Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively. DISCUSSION: In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10600482/ /pubmed/37901249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668 Text en Copyright © 2023 Carver, Kalesinskas and Ahmed https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Carver, Caden A.
Kalesinskas, Mikole
Ahmed, A. Razzaque
Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
title Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
title_full Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
title_fullStr Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
title_short Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
title_sort current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901249
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668
work_keys_str_mv AT carvercadena currentbiologicsintreatmentofpemphigusfoliaceusasystematicreview
AT kalesinskasmikole currentbiologicsintreatmentofpemphigusfoliaceusasystematicreview
AT ahmedarazzaque currentbiologicsintreatmentofpemphigusfoliaceusasystematicreview