Cargando…
Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current lite...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668 |
_version_ | 1785125996346736640 |
---|---|
author | Carver, Caden A. Kalesinskas, Mikole Ahmed, A. Razzaque |
author_facet | Carver, Caden A. Kalesinskas, Mikole Ahmed, A. Razzaque |
author_sort | Carver, Caden A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg. RESULTS: Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively. DISCUSSION: In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10600482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106004822023-10-27 Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review Carver, Caden A. Kalesinskas, Mikole Ahmed, A. Razzaque Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Pemphigus foliaceus (PF) differs from pemphigus vulgaris (PV) in that it affects only the skin and mucous membranes are not involved. Pemphigus is commonly treated with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (ISAs). More recently, biologics have been used. The current literature on biologic therapy often combines treatment of PF with PV, hence it is often difficult for clinicians to isolate the treatment of PF from PV. The purpose of this review was to provide information regarding the use of current biological therapy, specifically in PF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of PubMed, Embase, and other databases was conducted using keywords pemphigus foliaceus (PF), rituximab (RTX), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), and biologics. Forty-one studies were included in this review, which produced 105 patients with PF, treated with RTX, IVIg, or a combination of both. Eighty-five patients were treated with RTX, eight patients with IVIg, and 12 received both RTX and IVIg. RESULTS: Most patients in this review had PF that was nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapies (CIST), and had significant side effects from their use. RTX treatment resulted in complete remission (CR) in 63.2%, a relapse rate of 39.5%, an infection rate of 19.7%, and a mortality rate of 3.9%. Relapse was greater in the lymphoma (LP) protocol than the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) protocol (p<0.0001). IVIg led to CR in 62.5% of patients, with no relapses or infections. Patients receiving both biologics experienced better outcomes when RTX was first administered, then followed by IVIg. Follow-up durations for patients receiving RTX, IVIg, and both were 22.1, 24.8, and 35.7 months, respectively. DISCUSSION: In pemphigus foliaceus patients nonresponsive to conventional immunosuppressive therapy or in those with significant side effects from CIST, RTX and IVIg appear to be useful agents. Profile of clinical response, as well as relapse, infection, and mortality rates in PF patients treated with RTX were similar to those observed in PV patients. The data suggests that protocols specific for PF may produce better outcomes, less adverse effects, and improved quality of life. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10600482/ /pubmed/37901249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668 Text en Copyright © 2023 Carver, Kalesinskas and Ahmed https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Carver, Caden A. Kalesinskas, Mikole Ahmed, A. Razzaque Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
title | Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
title_full | Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
title_short | Current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
title_sort | current biologics in treatment of pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901249 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1267668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carvercadena currentbiologicsintreatmentofpemphigusfoliaceusasystematicreview AT kalesinskasmikole currentbiologicsintreatmentofpemphigusfoliaceusasystematicreview AT ahmedarazzaque currentbiologicsintreatmentofpemphigusfoliaceusasystematicreview |