Cargando…
Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has been the traditional surgical treatment for achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes with shorter procedure times. Studies comparing the direct cost-effectiveness of POEM vs LHM are limited. AI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900115 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i10.593 |
_version_ | 1785126041867517952 |
---|---|
author | Haider, Syedreza Ali Bills, Gregory S Gyawali, C Prakash Laoveeravat, Passisd Miller, Jordan Softic, Samir Wagh, Mihir S Gabr, Moamen |
author_facet | Haider, Syedreza Ali Bills, Gregory S Gyawali, C Prakash Laoveeravat, Passisd Miller, Jordan Softic, Samir Wagh, Mihir S Gabr, Moamen |
author_sort | Haider, Syedreza Ali |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has been the traditional surgical treatment for achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes with shorter procedure times. Studies comparing the direct cost-effectiveness of POEM vs LHM are limited. AIM: To compare costs of POEM vs LHM. METHODS: This retrospective chart review aimed to compare the outcomes and cost of clinical care between patients who underwent POEM and LHM procedures for achalasia. The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center from January 2019 to December 2020. Clinical outcomes, including post-operative Eckardt scores and adverse events, were assessed and compared between the two groups. Direct cost variance analysis was utilized to evaluate the cost of clinical care incurred by patients undergoing POEM in the year preceding the procedure, during the index admission, and one year post-procedure, in comparison to patients undergoing LHM. RESULTS: Of 30 patients were included (15 POEM and 15 LHM) in the study. Patients in the POEM group had a mean Eckardt score of 0.5 ± 0.5 post-procedure, which was no different from patients in the LHM group (0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.17) indicating comparative efficacy. However, the total costs of the admission for the procedure in the LHM group were on average $1827 more expensive than in the POEM group (P < 0.01). Total healthcare costs one year prior to index procedure were $7777 higher in the LHM group, but not statistically different (P = 0.34). The patients in the LHM group one year after the index procedure had accrued $19730.24 larger total cost, although this was not statistically different from POEM group (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Despite similar clinical outcomes, the cost of the index procedure admission for POEM was significantly lower than for LHM. The difference was primarily related to shorter time increments utilized in the operating room during the index procedure, and shorter length of hospital stay following POEM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10600690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106006902023-10-27 Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience Haider, Syedreza Ali Bills, Gregory S Gyawali, C Prakash Laoveeravat, Passisd Miller, Jordan Softic, Samir Wagh, Mihir S Gabr, Moamen World J Gastrointest Endosc Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has been the traditional surgical treatment for achalasia. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated similar clinical outcomes with shorter procedure times. Studies comparing the direct cost-effectiveness of POEM vs LHM are limited. AIM: To compare costs of POEM vs LHM. METHODS: This retrospective chart review aimed to compare the outcomes and cost of clinical care between patients who underwent POEM and LHM procedures for achalasia. The study was conducted at a tertiary academic center from January 2019 to December 2020. Clinical outcomes, including post-operative Eckardt scores and adverse events, were assessed and compared between the two groups. Direct cost variance analysis was utilized to evaluate the cost of clinical care incurred by patients undergoing POEM in the year preceding the procedure, during the index admission, and one year post-procedure, in comparison to patients undergoing LHM. RESULTS: Of 30 patients were included (15 POEM and 15 LHM) in the study. Patients in the POEM group had a mean Eckardt score of 0.5 ± 0.5 post-procedure, which was no different from patients in the LHM group (0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.17) indicating comparative efficacy. However, the total costs of the admission for the procedure in the LHM group were on average $1827 more expensive than in the POEM group (P < 0.01). Total healthcare costs one year prior to index procedure were $7777 higher in the LHM group, but not statistically different (P = 0.34). The patients in the LHM group one year after the index procedure had accrued $19730.24 larger total cost, although this was not statistically different from POEM group (P = 0.68). CONCLUSION: Despite similar clinical outcomes, the cost of the index procedure admission for POEM was significantly lower than for LHM. The difference was primarily related to shorter time increments utilized in the operating room during the index procedure, and shorter length of hospital stay following POEM. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-10-16 2023-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10600690/ /pubmed/37900115 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i10.593 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Retrospective Cohort Study Haider, Syedreza Ali Bills, Gregory S Gyawali, C Prakash Laoveeravat, Passisd Miller, Jordan Softic, Samir Wagh, Mihir S Gabr, Moamen Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience |
title | Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience |
title_full | Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience |
title_fullStr | Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience |
title_short | Direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: A tertiary referral center experience |
title_sort | direct cost variance analysis of peroral endoscopic myotomy vs heller myotomy for management of achalasia: a tertiary referral center experience |
topic | Retrospective Cohort Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37900115 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v15.i10.593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haidersyedrezaali directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT billsgregorys directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT gyawalicprakash directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT laoveeravatpassisd directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT millerjordan directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT softicsamir directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT waghmihirs directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience AT gabrmoamen directcostvarianceanalysisofperoralendoscopicmyotomyvshellermyotomyformanagementofachalasiaatertiaryreferralcenterexperience |