Cargando…

Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome

BACKGROUND: Autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs), a novel treatment derived from blood serum, have emerged as a groundbreaking solution for managing dry eye syndrome (DES). These drops have shown significant promise in relieving the distressing symptoms of DES. This study aimed to evaluate the safety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Na, Zhu, Si-Quan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901024
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6774
_version_ 1785126080627081216
author Zheng, Na
Zhu, Si-Quan
author_facet Zheng, Na
Zhu, Si-Quan
author_sort Zheng, Na
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs), a novel treatment derived from blood serum, have emerged as a groundbreaking solution for managing dry eye syndrome (DES). These drops have shown significant promise in relieving the distressing symptoms of DES. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ASEDs compared to traditional treatments, which often prove inadequate or result in unwanted side effects, particularly in individuals with moderate-to-severe DES. AIM: To evaluate whether ASEDs are safer and more effective than conventional artificial tears in the treatment of moderate-to-severe DES. METHODS: This multi-centered randomized controlled trial included 240 patients with moderate-to-severe DES from three ophthalmology clinics in China. They were randomly assigned to receive either ASEDs or artificial tears for 12 wk. The primary outcome was the change in the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, with secondary outcomes including tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC). Statistics analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance with adjustments made for baseline values. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that both ASEDs and artificial tears significantly improved the OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer I test, CFS, and CIC from baseline to week 12. The ASEDs group showed significantly greater improvement in all these measures than the artificial tears group (all P values < 0.05). The average difference in the OSDI score between the two cohorts was -10.3 (95% confidence interval: -13.6 to -7.0), indicating a substantial improvement in the ASEDs group. The occurrence of adverse events was comparable between cohorts, with no reports of severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: ASEDs are more effective and safer than artificial tears for mitigating symptoms of moderate-to-severe DES. ASEDs could be an alternative/supplementary therapy for patients with DES less responsive to traditional treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10600870
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106008702023-10-27 Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome Zheng, Na Zhu, Si-Quan World J Clin Cases Randomized Controlled Trial BACKGROUND: Autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs), a novel treatment derived from blood serum, have emerged as a groundbreaking solution for managing dry eye syndrome (DES). These drops have shown significant promise in relieving the distressing symptoms of DES. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ASEDs compared to traditional treatments, which often prove inadequate or result in unwanted side effects, particularly in individuals with moderate-to-severe DES. AIM: To evaluate whether ASEDs are safer and more effective than conventional artificial tears in the treatment of moderate-to-severe DES. METHODS: This multi-centered randomized controlled trial included 240 patients with moderate-to-severe DES from three ophthalmology clinics in China. They were randomly assigned to receive either ASEDs or artificial tears for 12 wk. The primary outcome was the change in the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, with secondary outcomes including tear break-up time (TBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC). Statistics analysis was performed using an analysis of covariance with adjustments made for baseline values. RESULTS: Our findings revealed that both ASEDs and artificial tears significantly improved the OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer I test, CFS, and CIC from baseline to week 12. The ASEDs group showed significantly greater improvement in all these measures than the artificial tears group (all P values < 0.05). The average difference in the OSDI score between the two cohorts was -10.3 (95% confidence interval: -13.6 to -7.0), indicating a substantial improvement in the ASEDs group. The occurrence of adverse events was comparable between cohorts, with no reports of severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: ASEDs are more effective and safer than artificial tears for mitigating symptoms of moderate-to-severe DES. ASEDs could be an alternative/supplementary therapy for patients with DES less responsive to traditional treatments. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2023-10-06 2023-10-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10600870/ /pubmed/37901024 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6774 Text en ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Randomized Controlled Trial
Zheng, Na
Zhu, Si-Quan
Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
title Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
title_full Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
title_fullStr Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
title_short Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
title_sort randomized controlled trial on the efficacy and safety of autologous serum eye drops in dry eye syndrome
topic Randomized Controlled Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10600870/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901024
http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i28.6774
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengna randomizedcontrolledtrialontheefficacyandsafetyofautologousserumeyedropsindryeyesyndrome
AT zhusiquan randomizedcontrolledtrialontheefficacyandsafetyofautologousserumeyedropsindryeyesyndrome