Cargando…

Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool

BACKGROUND: Assessing the quality of health services gives insights to managers about the status of services delivered by them, especially from the client’s perspective. Although various tools have been developed to measure the quality of primary health care (PHC), no specific tool was found in this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farrokhi, Pouria, Zarei, Ehsan, Bagherzadeh, Rafat, Irannejad, Behrooz, Hashjin, Asgar Aghaei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10162-x
_version_ 1785126126440415232
author Farrokhi, Pouria
Zarei, Ehsan
Bagherzadeh, Rafat
Irannejad, Behrooz
Hashjin, Asgar Aghaei
author_facet Farrokhi, Pouria
Zarei, Ehsan
Bagherzadeh, Rafat
Irannejad, Behrooz
Hashjin, Asgar Aghaei
author_sort Farrokhi, Pouria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessing the quality of health services gives insights to managers about the status of services delivered by them, especially from the client’s perspective. Although various tools have been developed to measure the quality of primary health care (PHC), no specific tool was found in this field in Iran. Therefore, the present study was conducted to develop and validate the quality assessment tool of PHC in Iran. METHODS: This methodological study was conducted in 2021. In the first step, based on a literature review, an initial questionnaire was designed, and its face validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability were evaluated. Descriptive tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, exploratory factor analysis, Kaiser-Myer-Olkin (KMO), and Cronbach’s alpha were performed by using SPSS 22. RESULTS: The initial questionnaire included 33 items, of which three items were removed due to inconsistency with factorization. The final questionnaire consisted of 30 items and nine dimensions: interaction, efficiency, timeliness, accuracy, consultation, tangibility, safety, accessibility, and environment. The KMO and Cronbach’s alpha index values were 0.734 and 0.82, respectively, indicating acceptable reliability and validity. The developed dimensions represented about 73% of the total variance. CONCLUSION: The designed questionnaire has relatively good validity and reliability and can be used to measure the quality of PHC and to identify weaknesses in service delivery. However, researchers should carefully examine it to enhance its applicability as a standard tool for measuring PHC quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10162-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10601108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106011082023-10-27 Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool Farrokhi, Pouria Zarei, Ehsan Bagherzadeh, Rafat Irannejad, Behrooz Hashjin, Asgar Aghaei BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Assessing the quality of health services gives insights to managers about the status of services delivered by them, especially from the client’s perspective. Although various tools have been developed to measure the quality of primary health care (PHC), no specific tool was found in this field in Iran. Therefore, the present study was conducted to develop and validate the quality assessment tool of PHC in Iran. METHODS: This methodological study was conducted in 2021. In the first step, based on a literature review, an initial questionnaire was designed, and its face validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability were evaluated. Descriptive tests, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, exploratory factor analysis, Kaiser-Myer-Olkin (KMO), and Cronbach’s alpha were performed by using SPSS 22. RESULTS: The initial questionnaire included 33 items, of which three items were removed due to inconsistency with factorization. The final questionnaire consisted of 30 items and nine dimensions: interaction, efficiency, timeliness, accuracy, consultation, tangibility, safety, accessibility, and environment. The KMO and Cronbach’s alpha index values were 0.734 and 0.82, respectively, indicating acceptable reliability and validity. The developed dimensions represented about 73% of the total variance. CONCLUSION: The designed questionnaire has relatively good validity and reliability and can be used to measure the quality of PHC and to identify weaknesses in service delivery. However, researchers should carefully examine it to enhance its applicability as a standard tool for measuring PHC quality. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-10162-x. BioMed Central 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10601108/ /pubmed/37885033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10162-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Farrokhi, Pouria
Zarei, Ehsan
Bagherzadeh, Rafat
Irannejad, Behrooz
Hashjin, Asgar Aghaei
Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
title Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
title_full Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
title_fullStr Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
title_short Development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
title_sort development and validation of primary health care quality assessment tool
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37885033
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10162-x
work_keys_str_mv AT farrokhipouria developmentandvalidationofprimaryhealthcarequalityassessmenttool
AT zareiehsan developmentandvalidationofprimaryhealthcarequalityassessmenttool
AT bagherzadehrafat developmentandvalidationofprimaryhealthcarequalityassessmenttool
AT irannejadbehrooz developmentandvalidationofprimaryhealthcarequalityassessmenttool
AT hashjinasgaraghaei developmentandvalidationofprimaryhealthcarequalityassessmenttool