Cargando…

Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England

BACKGROUND: Evidence from the UK from the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic showed that people with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) had higher rates of covid-19 mortality than people without ID. However, estimates of the magnitude of risk vary widely; different studies used different time periods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sosenko, Filip, Mackay, Daniel, Pell, Jill P., Hatton, Chris, Jani, Bhautesh D., Cairns, Deborah, Ward, Laura, Henderson, Angela, Fleming, Michael, Nijhof, Dewy, Melville, Craig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16993-x
_version_ 1785126140948512768
author Sosenko, Filip
Mackay, Daniel
Pell, Jill P.
Hatton, Chris
Jani, Bhautesh D.
Cairns, Deborah
Ward, Laura
Henderson, Angela
Fleming, Michael
Nijhof, Dewy
Melville, Craig
author_facet Sosenko, Filip
Mackay, Daniel
Pell, Jill P.
Hatton, Chris
Jani, Bhautesh D.
Cairns, Deborah
Ward, Laura
Henderson, Angela
Fleming, Michael
Nijhof, Dewy
Melville, Craig
author_sort Sosenko, Filip
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence from the UK from the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic showed that people with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) had higher rates of covid-19 mortality than people without ID. However, estimates of the magnitude of risk vary widely; different studies used different time periods; and only early stages of the pandemic have been analysed. Existing analyses of risk factors have also been limited. The objective of this study was to investigate covid-19 mortality rates, hospitalisation rates, and risk factors in people with ID in England up to the end of 2021. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all people with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or death involving covid-19. Datasets covering primary care, secondary care, covid-19 tests and vaccinations, prescriptions, and deaths were linked at individual level. RESULTS: Covid-19 carries a disproportionately higher risk of death for people with ID, above their already higher risk of dying from other causes, in comparison to those without ID. Around 2,000 people with ID had a death involving covid-19 in England up to the end of 2021; approximately 1 in 180. The covid-19 standardized mortality ratio was 5.6 [95% CI 5.4, 5.9]. People with ID were also more likely to be hospitalised for covid-19 than people without ID. The main determinants of severe covid-19 outcomes (deaths and/or hospitalisations) in both populations were age, multimorbidity and vaccination status. The key factor responsible for the higher risk of severe covid-19 in the ID population was a much higher prevalence of multimorbidity in this population. AstraZeneca vaccine was slightly less effective in preventing severe covid-19 outcomes among people with ID than among people without ID. CONCLUSIONS: People with ID should be considered a priority group in future pandemics, such as shielding and vaccinations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16993-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10601171
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106011712023-10-27 Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England Sosenko, Filip Mackay, Daniel Pell, Jill P. Hatton, Chris Jani, Bhautesh D. Cairns, Deborah Ward, Laura Henderson, Angela Fleming, Michael Nijhof, Dewy Melville, Craig BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Evidence from the UK from the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic showed that people with Intellectual Disabilities (ID) had higher rates of covid-19 mortality than people without ID. However, estimates of the magnitude of risk vary widely; different studies used different time periods; and only early stages of the pandemic have been analysed. Existing analyses of risk factors have also been limited. The objective of this study was to investigate covid-19 mortality rates, hospitalisation rates, and risk factors in people with ID in England up to the end of 2021. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all people with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or death involving covid-19. Datasets covering primary care, secondary care, covid-19 tests and vaccinations, prescriptions, and deaths were linked at individual level. RESULTS: Covid-19 carries a disproportionately higher risk of death for people with ID, above their already higher risk of dying from other causes, in comparison to those without ID. Around 2,000 people with ID had a death involving covid-19 in England up to the end of 2021; approximately 1 in 180. The covid-19 standardized mortality ratio was 5.6 [95% CI 5.4, 5.9]. People with ID were also more likely to be hospitalised for covid-19 than people without ID. The main determinants of severe covid-19 outcomes (deaths and/or hospitalisations) in both populations were age, multimorbidity and vaccination status. The key factor responsible for the higher risk of severe covid-19 in the ID population was a much higher prevalence of multimorbidity in this population. AstraZeneca vaccine was slightly less effective in preventing severe covid-19 outcomes among people with ID than among people without ID. CONCLUSIONS: People with ID should be considered a priority group in future pandemics, such as shielding and vaccinations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-023-16993-x. BioMed Central 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10601171/ /pubmed/37880687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16993-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sosenko, Filip
Mackay, Daniel
Pell, Jill P.
Hatton, Chris
Jani, Bhautesh D.
Cairns, Deborah
Ward, Laura
Henderson, Angela
Fleming, Michael
Nijhof, Dewy
Melville, Craig
Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England
title Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England
title_full Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England
title_fullStr Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England
title_full_unstemmed Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England
title_short Understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in England
title_sort understanding covid-19 outcomes among people with intellectual disabilities in england
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601171/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16993-x
work_keys_str_mv AT sosenkofilip understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT mackaydaniel understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT pelljillp understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT hattonchris understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT janibhauteshd understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT cairnsdeborah understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT wardlaura understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT hendersonangela understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT flemingmichael understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT nijhofdewy understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT melvillecraig understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland
AT understandingcovid19outcomesamongpeoplewithintellectualdisabilitiesinengland