Cargando…

Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022

INTRODUCTION: This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the validity and reliability of Persian short version of the Literacy of Suicide Scale (LOSS) among the general population. METHODS: This methodological study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of Persian short...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jafari, Alireza, Nejatian, Mahbobeh, Mokhtari, Ali Mohammad, Naddafi, Fatemehzahra, Moshki, Mahdi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05281-y
_version_ 1785126172994043904
author Jafari, Alireza
Nejatian, Mahbobeh
Mokhtari, Ali Mohammad
Naddafi, Fatemehzahra
Moshki, Mahdi
author_facet Jafari, Alireza
Nejatian, Mahbobeh
Mokhtari, Ali Mohammad
Naddafi, Fatemehzahra
Moshki, Mahdi
author_sort Jafari, Alireza
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the validity and reliability of Persian short version of the Literacy of Suicide Scale (LOSS) among the general population. METHODS: This methodological study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of Persian short form of LOSS among the general population, using a sample of 1175 participants in Iran, 2022. Participants were entered to study using method of proportional stratified sampling. The validity of Persian short form of LOSS was checked by four measures of validity: qualitative face validity, qualitative content validity, EFA (exploratory of factor analysis), and CFA (confirmatory factor analysis). The measure of reliability of Persian short form of LOSS was checked by three reliability of McDonald omega coefficient, ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient), and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. RESULTS: Based on the findings of EFA, 4 components with eigenvalues > 1 were extracted and these 4 factors were able to explain 57.96% of variance. In EFA section, only 1 question was deleted due to entry into the non -relevant sub –scale. Based on the results of CFA, all items had the factor loading greater than 0.4 and none of the items were removed at this stage. In CFA, based the results of goodness-of-fit indexes for example: χ2/df = 2.077, NFI: 0.957, IFI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.030, GFI: 0.988, and PGFI = 0.569, the final mode was approved with 11 items and 4 factors. In this study for all items, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.739, McDonald omega coefficient was 0.753, and ICC was 0.860. Finally, the Persian short form of LOSS was approved with 11 items and four dimensions of signs/ symptoms with 3 questions, the risk factors with 2 questions, treatment/ prevention with 2 questions, and causes/ triggers with 4 questions. CONCLUSION: The Persian short form of LOSS with 11 items and four subscales is a valid and reliable scale to survey the suicide literacy status in the general population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05281-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10601306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106013062023-10-27 Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022 Jafari, Alireza Nejatian, Mahbobeh Mokhtari, Ali Mohammad Naddafi, Fatemehzahra Moshki, Mahdi BMC Psychiatry Research INTRODUCTION: This research was conducted with the aim of evaluating the validity and reliability of Persian short version of the Literacy of Suicide Scale (LOSS) among the general population. METHODS: This methodological study was conducted to evaluate the validity and reliability of Persian short form of LOSS among the general population, using a sample of 1175 participants in Iran, 2022. Participants were entered to study using method of proportional stratified sampling. The validity of Persian short form of LOSS was checked by four measures of validity: qualitative face validity, qualitative content validity, EFA (exploratory of factor analysis), and CFA (confirmatory factor analysis). The measure of reliability of Persian short form of LOSS was checked by three reliability of McDonald omega coefficient, ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient), and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. RESULTS: Based on the findings of EFA, 4 components with eigenvalues > 1 were extracted and these 4 factors were able to explain 57.96% of variance. In EFA section, only 1 question was deleted due to entry into the non -relevant sub –scale. Based on the results of CFA, all items had the factor loading greater than 0.4 and none of the items were removed at this stage. In CFA, based the results of goodness-of-fit indexes for example: χ2/df = 2.077, NFI: 0.957, IFI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.030, GFI: 0.988, and PGFI = 0.569, the final mode was approved with 11 items and 4 factors. In this study for all items, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.739, McDonald omega coefficient was 0.753, and ICC was 0.860. Finally, the Persian short form of LOSS was approved with 11 items and four dimensions of signs/ symptoms with 3 questions, the risk factors with 2 questions, treatment/ prevention with 2 questions, and causes/ triggers with 4 questions. CONCLUSION: The Persian short form of LOSS with 11 items and four subscales is a valid and reliable scale to survey the suicide literacy status in the general population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-023-05281-y. BioMed Central 2023-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10601306/ /pubmed/37880611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05281-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Jafari, Alireza
Nejatian, Mahbobeh
Mokhtari, Ali Mohammad
Naddafi, Fatemehzahra
Moshki, Mahdi
Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022
title Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022
title_full Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022
title_fullStr Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022
title_short Evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (LOSS): a methodological study in 2022
title_sort evaluation the validity and reliability of persian short form of the literacy of suicide scale (loss): a methodological study in 2022
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37880611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-05281-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jafarialireza evaluationthevalidityandreliabilityofpersianshortformoftheliteracyofsuicidescalelossamethodologicalstudyin2022
AT nejatianmahbobeh evaluationthevalidityandreliabilityofpersianshortformoftheliteracyofsuicidescalelossamethodologicalstudyin2022
AT mokhtarialimohammad evaluationthevalidityandreliabilityofpersianshortformoftheliteracyofsuicidescalelossamethodologicalstudyin2022
AT naddafifatemehzahra evaluationthevalidityandreliabilityofpersianshortformoftheliteracyofsuicidescalelossamethodologicalstudyin2022
AT moshkimahdi evaluationthevalidityandreliabilityofpersianshortformoftheliteracyofsuicidescalelossamethodologicalstudyin2022