Cargando…
Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects
OBJECTIVES: Anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) is widely used in Swedish routine clinical practice to decide if septoplasty is necessary. The scientific basis for the method needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the aims were to evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR), paradoxical reactions to pharm...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1157 |
_version_ | 1785126223816425472 |
---|---|
author | Sunnergren, Ola Ahonen, Hanna Holmström, Mats Broström, Anders |
author_facet | Sunnergren, Ola Ahonen, Hanna Holmström, Mats Broström, Anders |
author_sort | Sunnergren, Ola |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) is widely used in Swedish routine clinical practice to decide if septoplasty is necessary. The scientific basis for the method needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the aims were to evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR), paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion, and test–retest characteristics of the Rhino‐Comp® AAR in healthy subjects. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal design was used. AAR was performed before and after decongestion at baseline and after ≥6 months on 60 healthy volunteers. The relationships between NAR, height, weight, BMI, sex, and allergic rhinitis were evaluated by regression analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate paradoxical reactions. Test–retest and repeatability characteristics were evaluated with intra‐class coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's α, and standard error of measurement RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between genders or nasal cavity sides. NAR was statistically significantly related to height. Short‐ and long‐term test–retest characteristics were good with ICC and Cronbach's α > .75. The minimal significant difference in NAR Log10V2 values between the two measurements was 0.11 and 0.09 (long‐ and short‐term). Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion were rare, mostly weak, and not evidently reproducible. CONCLUSION: In this study, we report reference data for healthy subjects, test–retest capabilities, and the minimal relevant difference between two measurements for the Rhino‐Comp® AAR, information that is vital and necessary for the appropriate use of AAR in clinical practice. An effective method for pharmacological decongestion is described and recommended for future studies and clinical practice. Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestants exist but maybe without clinical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10601575 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106015752023-10-27 Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects Sunnergren, Ola Ahonen, Hanna Holmström, Mats Broström, Anders Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology OBJECTIVES: Anterior active rhinomanometry (AAR) is widely used in Swedish routine clinical practice to decide if septoplasty is necessary. The scientific basis for the method needs to be strengthened. Therefore, the aims were to evaluate nasal airway resistance (NAR), paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion, and test–retest characteristics of the Rhino‐Comp® AAR in healthy subjects. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal design was used. AAR was performed before and after decongestion at baseline and after ≥6 months on 60 healthy volunteers. The relationships between NAR, height, weight, BMI, sex, and allergic rhinitis were evaluated by regression analyses. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate paradoxical reactions. Test–retest and repeatability characteristics were evaluated with intra‐class coefficients (ICC), Cronbach's α, and standard error of measurement RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between genders or nasal cavity sides. NAR was statistically significantly related to height. Short‐ and long‐term test–retest characteristics were good with ICC and Cronbach's α > .75. The minimal significant difference in NAR Log10V2 values between the two measurements was 0.11 and 0.09 (long‐ and short‐term). Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestion were rare, mostly weak, and not evidently reproducible. CONCLUSION: In this study, we report reference data for healthy subjects, test–retest capabilities, and the minimal relevant difference between two measurements for the Rhino‐Comp® AAR, information that is vital and necessary for the appropriate use of AAR in clinical practice. An effective method for pharmacological decongestion is described and recommended for future studies and clinical practice. Paradoxical reactions to pharmacological decongestants exist but maybe without clinical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10601575/ /pubmed/37899860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1157 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology Sunnergren, Ola Ahonen, Hanna Holmström, Mats Broström, Anders Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
title | Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
title_full | Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
title_fullStr | Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
title_full_unstemmed | Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
title_short | Active anterior rhinomanometry: A study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
title_sort | active anterior rhinomanometry: a study on nasal airway resistance, paradoxical reactions to decongestion, and repeatability in healthy subjects |
topic | Allergy, Rhinology, and Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601575/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37899860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunnergrenola activeanteriorrhinomanometryastudyonnasalairwayresistanceparadoxicalreactionstodecongestionandrepeatabilityinhealthysubjects AT ahonenhanna activeanteriorrhinomanometryastudyonnasalairwayresistanceparadoxicalreactionstodecongestionandrepeatabilityinhealthysubjects AT holmstrommats activeanteriorrhinomanometryastudyonnasalairwayresistanceparadoxicalreactionstodecongestionandrepeatabilityinhealthysubjects AT brostromanders activeanteriorrhinomanometryastudyonnasalairwayresistanceparadoxicalreactionstodecongestionandrepeatabilityinhealthysubjects |