Cargando…

Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of oesophageal (OC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), and gastric cancer (GC) includes either neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) for OC or GOJ or perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahnam, Adel, Nindra, Udit, McNamee, Nicholas, Yoon, Robert, Asghari, Ray, Ng, Weng, Karikios, Deme, Wong, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: S. Karger AG 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531536
_version_ 1785126280823308288
author Shahnam, Adel
Nindra, Udit
McNamee, Nicholas
Yoon, Robert
Asghari, Ray
Ng, Weng
Karikios, Deme
Wong, Mark
author_facet Shahnam, Adel
Nindra, Udit
McNamee, Nicholas
Yoon, Robert
Asghari, Ray
Ng, Weng
Karikios, Deme
Wong, Mark
author_sort Shahnam, Adel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Treatment of oesophageal (OC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), and gastric cancer (GC) includes either neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) for OC or GOJ or perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for OC, GOJ, and GC adenocarcinomas. This study aims to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with GC, GOJ, and OC treated with FLOT or CROSS and identify variables associated with efficacy through exploratory analysis. We also aimed to evaluate the comparison of FLOT and CROSS for the treatment of OC and GOJ adenocarcinomas. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of patients with locally advanced OC, GOJ, or GC treated with FLOT or CROSS between January 2015 and June 2021 in 5 cancer centres across Sydney, Australia. Long-rank test was used to compare survival estimated between subgroups. Hazard ratios for univariate and multivariate analyses were estimated with Cox proportional regression. RESULTS: The study included 168 patients. The 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for FLOT were 59% and 69%, respectively. The median RFS was 29.6 months and median OS was not reached. For CROSS, the 24-month RFS and OS were 55% and 63% with a median RFS and OS of 28.5 and 40.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in OS and RFS between the treatments. FLOT was less tolerable than CROSS with more dose reductions, treatment discontinuation, and clinically relevant grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio was associated with survival for both treatments. CONCLUSION: Similar efficacy outcomes were seen in this real-world population compared to the clinical trials for FLOT and CROSS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10601866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher S. Karger AG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106018662023-10-27 Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers Shahnam, Adel Nindra, Udit McNamee, Nicholas Yoon, Robert Asghari, Ray Ng, Weng Karikios, Deme Wong, Mark Gastrointest Tumors Research Article INTRODUCTION: Treatment of oesophageal (OC), gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), and gastric cancer (GC) includes either neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) for OC or GOJ or perioperative 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for OC, GOJ, and GC adenocarcinomas. This study aims to describe the real-world outcomes of patients with GC, GOJ, and OC treated with FLOT or CROSS and identify variables associated with efficacy through exploratory analysis. We also aimed to evaluate the comparison of FLOT and CROSS for the treatment of OC and GOJ adenocarcinomas. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study of patients with locally advanced OC, GOJ, or GC treated with FLOT or CROSS between January 2015 and June 2021 in 5 cancer centres across Sydney, Australia. Long-rank test was used to compare survival estimated between subgroups. Hazard ratios for univariate and multivariate analyses were estimated with Cox proportional regression. RESULTS: The study included 168 patients. The 24-month relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for FLOT were 59% and 69%, respectively. The median RFS was 29.6 months and median OS was not reached. For CROSS, the 24-month RFS and OS were 55% and 63% with a median RFS and OS of 28.5 and 40.2 months, respectively. There was no difference in OS and RFS between the treatments. FLOT was less tolerable than CROSS with more dose reductions, treatment discontinuation, and clinically relevant grade 3 and 4 toxicity. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio was associated with survival for both treatments. CONCLUSION: Similar efficacy outcomes were seen in this real-world population compared to the clinical trials for FLOT and CROSS. S. Karger AG 2023-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10601866/ /pubmed/37901653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531536 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC) (http://www.karger.com/Services/OpenAccessLicense). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shahnam, Adel
Nindra, Udit
McNamee, Nicholas
Yoon, Robert
Asghari, Ray
Ng, Weng
Karikios, Deme
Wong, Mark
Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers
title Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers
title_full Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers
title_fullStr Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers
title_short Real-World Outcomes of FLOT versus CROSS Regimens for Patients with Oesophagogastric Cancers
title_sort real-world outcomes of flot versus cross regimens for patients with oesophagogastric cancers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10601866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37901653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000531536
work_keys_str_mv AT shahnamadel realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT nindraudit realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT mcnameenicholas realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT yoonrobert realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT asghariray realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT ngweng realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT karikiosdeme realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers
AT wongmark realworldoutcomesofflotversuscrossregimensforpatientswithoesophagogastriccancers