Cargando…
Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
BACKGROUND: During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society of Global Health
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.06050 |
_version_ | 1785126347992989696 |
---|---|
author | Ursić, Luka Žuljević, Marija F Vuković, Miro Bralić, Nensi Roje, Rea Matas, Jakov Mijatović, Antonija Sapunar, Damir Marušić, Ana |
author_facet | Ursić, Luka Žuljević, Marija F Vuković, Miro Bralić, Nensi Roje, Rea Matas, Jakov Mijatović, Antonija Sapunar, Damir Marušić, Ana |
author_sort | Ursić, Luka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few have focused on public health guidelines and recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed health systems guidance (HSG) produced by the WHO, the ECDC, and the CDC for the 2009 H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics. METHODS: We extracted HSG for the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics from the organisations’ dedicated repositories and websites. After screening the retrieved documents for eligibility, five assessors evaluated them using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation – Health Systems (AGREE-HS) tool to assess the completeness and transparency of reporting according to the five AGREE-HS domains: “Topic”, “Participants”, “Methods”, “Recommendations”, and “Implementability”. RESULTS: Following the screening process, we included 108 HSG in the analysis. We observed statistically significant differences between the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, with HSG issued during COVID-19 receiving higher AGREE-HS scores. The HSG produced by the CDC had significantly lower overall scores and single-domain scores compared to the WHO and ECDC. However, all HSG scored relatively low, under the median of 40 total points (range = 10-70), indicating incomplete reporting. The HSG produced by all three organisations received a median score <4 (range = 1-7) for the “Participants”, “Methods”, and “Implementability” domains. CONCLUSIONS: There is still significant progress to be made in the quality and completeness of reporting in HSG issued during pandemics, especially regarding methodological approaches and the composition of the guidance development team. Due to their significant impact and importance for healthcare systems globally, HSG issued during future healthcare crises should adhere to best reporting practices to increase uptake by stakeholders and ensure public trust in healthcare organisations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10602204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | International Society of Global Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106022042023-10-27 Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool Ursić, Luka Žuljević, Marija F Vuković, Miro Bralić, Nensi Roje, Rea Matas, Jakov Mijatović, Antonija Sapunar, Damir Marušić, Ana J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few have focused on public health guidelines and recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed health systems guidance (HSG) produced by the WHO, the ECDC, and the CDC for the 2009 H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics. METHODS: We extracted HSG for the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics from the organisations’ dedicated repositories and websites. After screening the retrieved documents for eligibility, five assessors evaluated them using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation – Health Systems (AGREE-HS) tool to assess the completeness and transparency of reporting according to the five AGREE-HS domains: “Topic”, “Participants”, “Methods”, “Recommendations”, and “Implementability”. RESULTS: Following the screening process, we included 108 HSG in the analysis. We observed statistically significant differences between the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, with HSG issued during COVID-19 receiving higher AGREE-HS scores. The HSG produced by the CDC had significantly lower overall scores and single-domain scores compared to the WHO and ECDC. However, all HSG scored relatively low, under the median of 40 total points (range = 10-70), indicating incomplete reporting. The HSG produced by all three organisations received a median score <4 (range = 1-7) for the “Participants”, “Methods”, and “Implementability” domains. CONCLUSIONS: There is still significant progress to be made in the quality and completeness of reporting in HSG issued during pandemics, especially regarding methodological approaches and the composition of the guidance development team. Due to their significant impact and importance for healthcare systems globally, HSG issued during future healthcare crises should adhere to best reporting practices to increase uptake by stakeholders and ensure public trust in healthcare organisations. International Society of Global Health 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10602204/ /pubmed/37883198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.06050 Text en Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Ursić, Luka Žuljević, Marija F Vuković, Miro Bralić, Nensi Roje, Rea Matas, Jakov Mijatović, Antonija Sapunar, Damir Marušić, Ana Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool |
title | Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool |
title_full | Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool |
title_fullStr | Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool |
title_short | Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool |
title_sort | assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the agree-hs tool |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.06050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ursicluka assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT zuljevicmarijaf assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT vukovicmiro assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT bralicnensi assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT rojerea assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT matasjakov assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT mijatovicantonija assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT sapunardamir assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool AT marusicana assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool |