Cargando…

Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool

BACKGROUND: During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ursić, Luka, Žuljević, Marija F, Vuković, Miro, Bralić, Nensi, Roje, Rea, Matas, Jakov, Mijatović, Antonija, Sapunar, Damir, Marušić, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Society of Global Health 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883198
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.06050
_version_ 1785126347992989696
author Ursić, Luka
Žuljević, Marija F
Vuković, Miro
Bralić, Nensi
Roje, Rea
Matas, Jakov
Mijatović, Antonija
Sapunar, Damir
Marušić, Ana
author_facet Ursić, Luka
Žuljević, Marija F
Vuković, Miro
Bralić, Nensi
Roje, Rea
Matas, Jakov
Mijatović, Antonija
Sapunar, Damir
Marušić, Ana
author_sort Ursić, Luka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few have focused on public health guidelines and recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed health systems guidance (HSG) produced by the WHO, the ECDC, and the CDC for the 2009 H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics. METHODS: We extracted HSG for the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics from the organisations’ dedicated repositories and websites. After screening the retrieved documents for eligibility, five assessors evaluated them using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation – Health Systems (AGREE-HS) tool to assess the completeness and transparency of reporting according to the five AGREE-HS domains: “Topic”, “Participants”, “Methods”, “Recommendations”, and “Implementability”. RESULTS: Following the screening process, we included 108 HSG in the analysis. We observed statistically significant differences between the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, with HSG issued during COVID-19 receiving higher AGREE-HS scores. The HSG produced by the CDC had significantly lower overall scores and single-domain scores compared to the WHO and ECDC. However, all HSG scored relatively low, under the median of 40 total points (range = 10-70), indicating incomplete reporting. The HSG produced by all three organisations received a median score <4 (range = 1-7) for the “Participants”, “Methods”, and “Implementability” domains. CONCLUSIONS: There is still significant progress to be made in the quality and completeness of reporting in HSG issued during pandemics, especially regarding methodological approaches and the composition of the guidance development team. Due to their significant impact and importance for healthcare systems globally, HSG issued during future healthcare crises should adhere to best reporting practices to increase uptake by stakeholders and ensure public trust in healthcare organisations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher International Society of Global Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106022042023-10-27 Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool Ursić, Luka Žuljević, Marija F Vuković, Miro Bralić, Nensi Roje, Rea Matas, Jakov Mijatović, Antonija Sapunar, Damir Marušić, Ana J Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few have focused on public health guidelines and recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed health systems guidance (HSG) produced by the WHO, the ECDC, and the CDC for the 2009 H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics. METHODS: We extracted HSG for the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics from the organisations’ dedicated repositories and websites. After screening the retrieved documents for eligibility, five assessors evaluated them using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation – Health Systems (AGREE-HS) tool to assess the completeness and transparency of reporting according to the five AGREE-HS domains: “Topic”, “Participants”, “Methods”, “Recommendations”, and “Implementability”. RESULTS: Following the screening process, we included 108 HSG in the analysis. We observed statistically significant differences between the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, with HSG issued during COVID-19 receiving higher AGREE-HS scores. The HSG produced by the CDC had significantly lower overall scores and single-domain scores compared to the WHO and ECDC. However, all HSG scored relatively low, under the median of 40 total points (range = 10-70), indicating incomplete reporting. The HSG produced by all three organisations received a median score <4 (range = 1-7) for the “Participants”, “Methods”, and “Implementability” domains. CONCLUSIONS: There is still significant progress to be made in the quality and completeness of reporting in HSG issued during pandemics, especially regarding methodological approaches and the composition of the guidance development team. Due to their significant impact and importance for healthcare systems globally, HSG issued during future healthcare crises should adhere to best reporting practices to increase uptake by stakeholders and ensure public trust in healthcare organisations. International Society of Global Health 2023-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10602204/ /pubmed/37883198 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.06050 Text en Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Articles
Ursić, Luka
Žuljević, Marija F
Vuković, Miro
Bralić, Nensi
Roje, Rea
Matas, Jakov
Mijatović, Antonija
Sapunar, Damir
Marušić, Ana
Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
title Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
title_full Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
title_fullStr Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
title_short Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool
title_sort assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the agree-hs tool
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883198
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.06050
work_keys_str_mv AT ursicluka assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT zuljevicmarijaf assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT vukovicmiro assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT bralicnensi assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT rojerea assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT matasjakov assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT mijatovicantonija assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT sapunardamir assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool
AT marusicana assessingthequalityandcompletenessofreportinginhealthsystemsguidanceforpandemicsusingtheagreehstool