Cargando…

Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis

RESEARCH DESIGN. Finite element analysis based on computed tomography images from the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE. Determined the pullout strength of unsatisfactorily placed screws and repositioned screws after unsatisfactory place in lumbar spine surgery. BACKGROUND. Pedicle screws are widely used to s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Yu-Xing, Huang, Da-Geng, Hao, Ding-Jun, Liu, Jia-Yuan, Ji, Jia-Jia, Guo, Jin-Niu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004553
_version_ 1785126351801417728
author Ye, Yu-Xing
Huang, Da-Geng
Hao, Ding-Jun
Liu, Jia-Yuan
Ji, Jia-Jia
Guo, Jin-Niu
author_facet Ye, Yu-Xing
Huang, Da-Geng
Hao, Ding-Jun
Liu, Jia-Yuan
Ji, Jia-Jia
Guo, Jin-Niu
author_sort Ye, Yu-Xing
collection PubMed
description RESEARCH DESIGN. Finite element analysis based on computed tomography images from the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE. Determined the pullout strength of unsatisfactorily placed screws and repositioned screws after unsatisfactory place in lumbar spine surgery. BACKGROUND. Pedicle screws are widely used to stabilize the spinal vertebral body. Unsatisfactory screws could lead to surgical complications, and may need to be repositioned. Screw removal and reposition, however, may decrease pullout strength. METHODS. We conducted a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on high-resolution computed tomography images from a 39-year-old healthy woman. Pullout strength was determined with the screw placed in different orientations at the same entry point (as selected by the Magerl method), as well as after removal and reposition. The material properties of the vertebral body and the screw were simulated by using grayscale values and verified data, respectively. A load along the screw axis was applied to the end of the screw to simulate the pullout. RESULTS. The pullout strength was 1840.0 N with the Magerl method. For unsatisfactorily placed screws, the pullout strength was 1500.8 N at 20% overlap, 1609.6 N at 40% overlap, 1628.9 N at 60% overlap, and 1734.7 N at 80% overlap with the hypothetical screw path of the Magerl method. For repositioned screws, the pullout strength was 1763.6 N, with 20% overlap, 1728.3 N at 40% overlap, 1544.0 N at 60% overlap, and 1491.1 N at 80% overlap, with the original path. Comparison of repositioned screw with unsatisfactorily placed screw showed 14.04% decrease in pullout strength at 80% overlap, 5.21% decrease at 60% overlap, 7.37% increase at 40% overlap, and 17.51% increase at 20% overlap, with the screw path of the Magerl method. CONCLUSIONS. Removal and reposition increased the pullout strength at 20% and 40% overlap, but decreased the pullout strength at 60% and 80% overlap. For clinical translation, we recommend removal and reposition of the screw when the overlap is in the range of 20% to 40% or less. In vitro specimen studies are needed to verify these preliminary findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10602223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-106022232023-10-27 Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis Ye, Yu-Xing Huang, Da-Geng Hao, Ding-Jun Liu, Jia-Yuan Ji, Jia-Jia Guo, Jin-Niu Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Biomechanics RESEARCH DESIGN. Finite element analysis based on computed tomography images from the lumbar spine. OBJECTIVE. Determined the pullout strength of unsatisfactorily placed screws and repositioned screws after unsatisfactory place in lumbar spine surgery. BACKGROUND. Pedicle screws are widely used to stabilize the spinal vertebral body. Unsatisfactory screws could lead to surgical complications, and may need to be repositioned. Screw removal and reposition, however, may decrease pullout strength. METHODS. We conducted a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on high-resolution computed tomography images from a 39-year-old healthy woman. Pullout strength was determined with the screw placed in different orientations at the same entry point (as selected by the Magerl method), as well as after removal and reposition. The material properties of the vertebral body and the screw were simulated by using grayscale values and verified data, respectively. A load along the screw axis was applied to the end of the screw to simulate the pullout. RESULTS. The pullout strength was 1840.0 N with the Magerl method. For unsatisfactorily placed screws, the pullout strength was 1500.8 N at 20% overlap, 1609.6 N at 40% overlap, 1628.9 N at 60% overlap, and 1734.7 N at 80% overlap with the hypothetical screw path of the Magerl method. For repositioned screws, the pullout strength was 1763.6 N, with 20% overlap, 1728.3 N at 40% overlap, 1544.0 N at 60% overlap, and 1491.1 N at 80% overlap, with the original path. Comparison of repositioned screw with unsatisfactorily placed screw showed 14.04% decrease in pullout strength at 80% overlap, 5.21% decrease at 60% overlap, 7.37% increase at 40% overlap, and 17.51% increase at 20% overlap, with the screw path of the Magerl method. CONCLUSIONS. Removal and reposition increased the pullout strength at 20% and 40% overlap, but decreased the pullout strength at 60% and 80% overlap. For clinical translation, we recommend removal and reposition of the screw when the overlap is in the range of 20% to 40% or less. In vitro specimen studies are needed to verify these preliminary findings. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-11-15 2022-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10602223/ /pubmed/36541576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004553 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
spellingShingle Biomechanics
Ye, Yu-Xing
Huang, Da-Geng
Hao, Ding-Jun
Liu, Jia-Yuan
Ji, Jia-Jia
Guo, Jin-Niu
Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
title Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
title_fullStr Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
title_short Screw Pullout Strength After Pedicle Screw Reposition: A Finite Element Analysis
title_sort screw pullout strength after pedicle screw reposition: a finite element analysis
topic Biomechanics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36541576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004553
work_keys_str_mv AT yeyuxing screwpulloutstrengthafterpediclescrewrepositionafiniteelementanalysis
AT huangdageng screwpulloutstrengthafterpediclescrewrepositionafiniteelementanalysis
AT haodingjun screwpulloutstrengthafterpediclescrewrepositionafiniteelementanalysis
AT liujiayuan screwpulloutstrengthafterpediclescrewrepositionafiniteelementanalysis
AT jijiajia screwpulloutstrengthafterpediclescrewrepositionafiniteelementanalysis
AT guojinniu screwpulloutstrengthafterpediclescrewrepositionafiniteelementanalysis