Cargando…
Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance
There is a norm in psychology to use causally ambiguous statistical language, rather than straightforward causal language, when describing methods and results of nonexperimental studies. However, causally ambiguous language may inhibit a critical examination of the study’s causal assumptions and lea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286403 |
_version_ | 1785126381231800320 |
---|---|
author | Alvarez-Vargas, Daniela Braithwaite, David Lortie-Forgues, Hugues Moore, Melody Wan, Sirui Martin, Elizabeth Bailey, Drew Hal |
author_facet | Alvarez-Vargas, Daniela Braithwaite, David Lortie-Forgues, Hugues Moore, Melody Wan, Sirui Martin, Elizabeth Bailey, Drew Hal |
author_sort | Alvarez-Vargas, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | There is a norm in psychology to use causally ambiguous statistical language, rather than straightforward causal language, when describing methods and results of nonexperimental studies. However, causally ambiguous language may inhibit a critical examination of the study’s causal assumptions and lead to a greater acceptance of policy recommendations that rely on causal interpretations of nonexperimental findings. In a preregistered experiment, 142 psychology faculty, postdocs, and doctoral students (54% female), ages 22–67 (M = 33.20, SD = 8.96), rated the design and analysis from hypothetical studies with causally ambiguous statistical language as of higher quality (by .34-.80 SD) and as similarly or more supportive (by .16-.27 SD) of policy recommendations than studies described in straightforward causal language. Thus, using statistical rather than causal language to describe nonexperimental findings did not decrease, and may have increased, perceived support for implicitly causal conclusions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10602341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-106023412023-10-27 Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance Alvarez-Vargas, Daniela Braithwaite, David Lortie-Forgues, Hugues Moore, Melody Wan, Sirui Martin, Elizabeth Bailey, Drew Hal PLoS One Research Article There is a norm in psychology to use causally ambiguous statistical language, rather than straightforward causal language, when describing methods and results of nonexperimental studies. However, causally ambiguous language may inhibit a critical examination of the study’s causal assumptions and lead to a greater acceptance of policy recommendations that rely on causal interpretations of nonexperimental findings. In a preregistered experiment, 142 psychology faculty, postdocs, and doctoral students (54% female), ages 22–67 (M = 33.20, SD = 8.96), rated the design and analysis from hypothetical studies with causally ambiguous statistical language as of higher quality (by .34-.80 SD) and as similarly or more supportive (by .16-.27 SD) of policy recommendations than studies described in straightforward causal language. Thus, using statistical rather than causal language to describe nonexperimental findings did not decrease, and may have increased, perceived support for implicitly causal conclusions. Public Library of Science 2023-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10602341/ /pubmed/37883517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286403 Text en © 2023 Alvarez-Vargas et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Alvarez-Vargas, Daniela Braithwaite, David Lortie-Forgues, Hugues Moore, Melody Wan, Sirui Martin, Elizabeth Bailey, Drew Hal Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
title | Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
title_full | Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
title_fullStr | Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
title_full_unstemmed | Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
title_short | Hedges, mottes, and baileys: Causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
title_sort | hedges, mottes, and baileys: causally ambiguous statistical language can increase perceived study quality and policy relevance |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37883517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvarezvargasdaniela hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance AT braithwaitedavid hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance AT lortieforgueshugues hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance AT mooremelody hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance AT wansirui hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance AT martinelizabeth hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance AT baileydrewhal hedgesmottesandbaileyscausallyambiguousstatisticallanguagecanincreaseperceivedstudyqualityandpolicyrelevance |